Studies of argumentation in primary mathematics education

ZDM - Tập 32 - Trang 155-161 - 2000
Götz Krummheuer1
1Institut für Grundschul-und Integrationspädagogik, FB Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie, Frele Universität Berlin, Berlin

Tóm tắt

The participation of students in processes of collective argumentation is seen as a fundamental condition for enabling mathematics learning in classroom settings. Using data from a finished research project on argumentation in primary mathematics classrooms it will be shown, that in elementary education these processes are of a narrative character.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Attewell, P. (1974): Ethnomethodology since Garfinkel.—In: Theory and Society 1, p. 179~210 Bauersfeld, H. (1995). “Language games” in the mathematics classroom: Their function and their effects.—In: Cobb, P.; Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning. Interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbau Bauersfeld, H. et al. (1985): Interactional theory of leaning and teaching mathematics and related microethnographical studies. —In: Steiner, H. G.; Vermandel, H. (Eds.). Foundaiions and methodology of the discipline mathematics education (didactics of mathematics). Antwerp: University of Antwerp Blumer H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism.—Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Bruner, J. (1983), Child’s talk. Learning to use language.—Oxford: Oxford University Press Bruner, J. (1986): Actual minds, possible worlds.—Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press Bruner, J. (1990): Acts of Meaning.—Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press Bruner, J. (1996): The culture of education.—Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Erickson, F. (1982): Classroom discourse as improvisation.—In: Wilkinson, L. C. (Ed.): Communicating in the classroom.— New York: Academic Press Garfinkel, H. (1967): Studies in ethnomethodology.—Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Garfinkel, H. (1972): Remarks on Ethnomethodology.—In: Gumperz, J.J.; Hymes, D. (Eds.): Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt Krummheuer, G. (1995): The ethnography of argumentation.— In: Cobb, P.; Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.): The emergence of mathematical meaning: interaction in classroom cultures.—Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Krummheuer, G. (1997): Narrativität und Lernen. Mikrosoziologische Studien zur sozialen Konstitution schulischen Lernens. —Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag Lehmann, B. E. (1988): Rational ität im Alltag? Zur Konstitution sinnhaften Handelns in der Perspektive interpretative Soziologie. —Münster, New York: Waxmann Leiter, K. (1980): A primer on ethnomethodology.—Oxford: Oxford University Press Mehan, H.; Wood, H. (1975): The reality of Ethnomethodology. —New York: Wiley Perelman, C.; Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969): The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation.—Notre Dame, IN: London: University of Notre Dame Press Toulmin, S. E. (1969): The uses of argument.—Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms.—In: Cobb, P.; Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.): The emergemce of mathematical meaning: in teraction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Vollmer, N.;Krummheuer, G.(1997): Anfangen—Machen— Helfen. Zur Beziehung zwischen Arbeitsteilung und Aufgabenverständnis während einer Partnerarbeit im Mathematikunterricht. —In: Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 18 (2/3); p. 217~244 Yackel, E. (1995): Children’s talk in inquiry mathematics classrooms. —In: Cobb, P.; Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom culutres. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum