Students’ understanding of algebraic notation: A semiotic systems perspective
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alibali, 2007, A longitudinal examination of middle school students’ understandings of the equal sign and performance solving equivalent equations, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9, 221, 10.1080/10986060701360902
Arzarello, 2009, Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 97, 10.1007/s10649-008-9163-z
Bardini, 2004, Teaching linear functions in context with graphics calculators: students’ responses and the impact of the approach on their use of algebraic symbols, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 353, 10.1007/s10763-004-8075-3
Bartolini Bussi, 2008, Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: artefacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective, 720
Behr, 1980, How children view the equals sign, Mathematics Teaching, 92, 13
Berger, 2004, The functional use of a mathematical sign, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 81, 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017672.49486.f2
Blanton, 2003, Developing elementary teachers’ algebra eyes and ears, Teaching Children Mathematics, 10, 70, 10.5951/TCM.10.2.0070
Blanton, 2015, The development of children’s algebraic thinking: the impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46, 39, 10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
Boaler, J. (2003). Studying and capturing the complexity of practice—the case of the dance of agency. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Honolulu, Hawaii, Vol. IV, 3–16.
Brizuela, 2008, Multiple notational systems and algebraic understandings: the case of the best deal problem, 273
Brizuela, 2004, Fourth graders solving linear equations, For the Learning of Mathematics, 24, 33
Brizuela, 2004, Ten-year-old students solving linear equations, For the Learning of Mathematics, 24, 33
Brizuela, 2015, Children’s use of variables and variable notation to represent their algebraic ideas, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17, 34, 10.1080/10986065.2015.981939
Carraher, 2007, Early algebra and algebraic reasoning, 669
Carraher, 2006, Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 87
Carraher, 2008, Early algebra is not the same as algebra early, 235
Chalouh, 1988, Teaching algebraic expressions in a meaningful way
Christou, 2007, Students’ interpretations of literal symbols in algebra, 283
Clement, 1981, Translation difficulties in learning mathematics, American Mathematical Monthly, 88, 286, 10.1080/00029890.1981.11995253
Clement, 1982, Algebra word problem solutions: thought processes underlying a common misconception, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 16, 10.2307/748434
Dufour-Janvier, 1987, Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation, 109
Duval, 1995, Semiosis et pensée humaine
Duval, 1999, Representation, vision and visualization: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. Basic issues for learning, Vol. 1, 3
Duval, 2006, A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103, 10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
Ernest, 2006, A semiotic perspective of mathematical activity: the case of number, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 67, 10.1007/s10649-006-6423-7
Fairclough, 1995
Filloy, 1989, Solving equations: the transition from arithmetic to algebra, For the Learning of Mathematics, 9, 19
Fisher, 1988, The students-and-professors problem revisited, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 260, 10.2307/749069
Godfrey, 2008, Student perspectives on equation: the transition from school to university, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20, 71, 10.1007/BF03217478
Godino, 2010, Why is the learning of elementary arithmetic concepts difficult? Semiotic tools for understanding the nature of mathematical objects, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 247, 10.1007/s10649-010-9278-x
Goetz, 1984
Graham, 2000, Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 265, 10.1023/A:1004094013054
Gutierrez, 1995, Unpackaging academic discourse, Discourse Processes, 19, 21, 10.1080/01638539109544903
Herscovics, 1994, A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 59, 10.1007/BF01284528
Hoffman, 2006, What is a semiotic perspective, and what could it be? Some comments on the contributions to this special issue, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 279, 10.1007/s10649-006-1456-5
Küchemann, 1978, Children's understanding of numerical variables, Mathematics in School, 7, 23
Kaput, 1983, Errors in translations to algebraic equations: roots and implications, Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 5, 63
Kieran, 1990, Cognitive processes involved in learning school algebra, 96
Knuth, 2005, Middle school students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: equality & variable, Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37, 68, 10.1007/BF02655899
Knuth, 2006, Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 297
Lacampagne, 1995
Leont’ev, 1981, The problem of activity in psychology, 37
MacGregor, 1997, Students' understanding of algebraic notation: 11–15, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 1, 10.1023/A:1002970913563
MacGregor, 2001, Does learning algebra benefit most people?, Vol. 1, 296
Maschietto, 2009, Working with artefacts: gestures, drawings and speech in the construction of the mathematical meaning of the visual pyramid, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 143, 10.1007/s10649-008-9162-0
Matthews, 2012, Measure for measure: what combining diverse measures reveals about children's understanding of the equal sign as an indicator of mathematical equality, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43, 316, 10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0316
McNeil, 2006, Middle-school students’ understanding of the equal sign: the books they read can’t help, Cognition and Instruction, 24, 367, 10.1207/s1532690xci2403_3
McNeil, 2010, A is for apple: mnemonic symbols hinder students’ interpretation of algebraic expressions, Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 625, 10.1037/a0019105
Mehan, 1979
Mestre, 1988, The role of language comprehension in mathematics and problem solving, 201
Morgan, 2006, What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research?, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 219, 10.1007/s10649-006-5477-x
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000
National Research Council, 1998
Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volumes I–VI. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (Eds.) 1931–1935; volumes VII–VIII, A. W. Burks (Ed.) 1958. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Philipp, 1992, The many uses of algebraic variables, The Mathematics Teacher, 85, 557, 10.5951/MT.85.7.0557
Prediger, 2010, How to develop mathematics-for-teaching and understanding: the case of meanings of the equal sign, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 73, 10.1007/s10857-009-9119-y
RAND Mathematics Study Panel, 2003
Radford, 2007, Syntax and meaning as sensuous, visual: historical forms of algebraic thinking, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 145, 10.1007/s10649-006-9024-6
Radford, 2000, Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: a semiotic analysis, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 237, 10.1023/A:1017530828058
Radford, 2003, Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5, 37, 10.1207/S15327833MTL0501_02
Radford, 2006, The anthropology of meaning, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 39, 10.1007/s10649-006-7136-7
Radford, 2008, The ethics of being and knowing: towards a cultural theory of learning, 215
Radford, 2010, Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective, Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 1, 10.1080/14794800903569741
Rosnick, 1980, Learning without understanding: the effect of tutoring strategies on algebra misconceptions, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3, 3
Rotman, 2006, Toward a semiotics of mathematics, 97
Sáenz-Ludlow, 2006, Classroom interpreting games with an illustration, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 183, 10.1007/s10649-006-5760-x
Santi, G., & Sbaragli, S. (2008). Misconceptions and semiotics: a comparison. In A. Gagatsis (2008). Research in Mathematics Education. Conference of five cities: Nicosia, Rhodes, Bologna, Palermo, Locarno. Nicosia, Cyprus, 2008.
Santi, 2011, Objectification and semiotic function, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 285, 10.1007/s10649-010-9296-8
Schliemann, 2007
Schoenfeld, 1988, On the meaning of variable, Mathematics Teacher, 81, 420, 10.5951/MT.81.6.0420
Sfard, 2005, Why cannot children see as the same what grown-ups cannot see as different?: early numerical thinking revisited, Cognition and Instruction, 23, 237, 10.1207/s1532690xci2302_3
Sfard, 1998, On two metaphors for learning and on the dangers of choosing just one, Educational Researcher, 27, 4, 10.3102/0013189X027002004
Sfard, 2007, When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 567, 10.1080/10508400701525253
Sfard, 2012, Introduction: developing mathematical discourse—some insights from communicational research, International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 1, 10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.013
Steinberg, 1991, Algebra students’ knowledge of equivalence of equations, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 112, 10.2307/749588
Thompson, P. (1999). Representation and evolution: A discussion of Duval’s and Kaput’s papers. In F. Hitt, & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21 st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, 49–54.
Trigueros, M., & Ursini, S. (1999). Does the understanding of variable evolve through schooling? In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, Haifa, Israel, 273–280.
Trigueros, 2001, Approaching the study of algebra through the concept of variable
Trigueros, 2003, Starting college students’ difficulties in working with different uses of variable, Vol. 5, 1
Usiskin, 1988, Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables, 8
Vygotsky, 1978, Mind in society
van Oers, 2000, The appropriation of mathematical symbols. A psycho-semiotic approach to mathematics learning, 133
Weinberg, A. (2009). Students’ mental models for comparison word problems. In S. L. Sward, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31 st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 5, 709–717.
Weinberg, 2010, Undergraduate students’ interpretations of the equals sign
Wertsch, 1985
White, 1996, Conceptual knowledge in introductory calculus, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 79, 10.2307/749199