Students' dialogic and justifying moves during dialogic argumentation in mathematics and physics

Learning, Culture and Social Interaction - Tập 33 - Trang 100608 - 2022
Markus Hähkiöniemi1, Jenna Hiltunen2, Kaisa Jokiranta1, Jonathan Kilpelä1, Sami Lehesvuori1, Pasi Nieminen1
1University of Jyvaskyla, Department of Teacher Education, Finland
2University of Jyvaskyla, Finnish Institute for Educational Research, Finland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Asterhan, 2016, Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories, Educational Psychologist, 51, 164, 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458 Ayalon, 2016, Factors shaping students’ opportunities to engage in argumentative activity, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 575, 10.1007/s10763-014-9584-3 Bossér, 2021, Teachers’ coordination of dialogic and authoritative discourses promoting specific goals in socioscientific issue-based teaching, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 461, 10.1007/s10763-020-10061-1 Conner, 2014, Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86, 401, 10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8 Erduran, 2004, TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse, Science Education, 88, 915, 10.1002/sce.20012 Hennessy, 2016, Developing a coding scheme for analysing classroom dialogue across educational contexts, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 9, 16, 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001 Hiltunen, 2017, Recognising articulated reasoning in students' argumentative talk in mathematics lessons, FMSERA Journal, 1, 1 Howe, 2019, Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes?, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28, 462, 10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730 Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 Lehesvuori, 2019, Teacher orchestration of classroom interaction in science: Exploring dialogic and authoritative passages in whole-class discussions, International Journal of Science Education, 41, 2557, 10.1080/09500693.2019.1689586 Mercer, 1996, The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom, Learning and Instruction, 6, 359, 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7 Mercer, 2012, Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 12, 10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001 Mortimer, 2003 O’Connor, 2007, When is dialogue ‘dialogic’?, Human Development, 50, 275, 10.1159/000106415 Osborne, 2004, Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994, 10.1002/tea.20035 Reid, 2010 Scott, 2006, The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons, Science Education, 90, 605, 10.1002/sce.20131 Seelandt, 2018, Quality control: Assessing reliability and validity, 227 Toulmin, 1958 Webb, 2014, Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning, International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79, 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001 Wells, 2007, Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge, Human Development, 50, 244, 10.1159/000106414