Student revision with peer and expert reviewing

Anderson, 1998 Bandura, 1986 Bangert-Drowns, 2004, The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: a meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 74, 29, 10.3102/00346543074001029 Beach, 1979, The effects of between-draft teacher evaluation versus student self-evaluation on high school students' revising of rough drafts, Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 111 Beach, 2006, Response to writing, 222 Beason, 1993, Feedback and revision in writing across the curriculum classes, Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 395 Berg, 1999, The effect of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5 Besnard, 1999, Expert error in trouble-shooting: an exploratory study in electronics, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 50, 391, 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0251 Boscolo, 2004, Effects of collaborative revision on children's ability to write understandable narrative texts, Vol. 13, 157 Camerer, 1989, The curse of knowledge in economic settings: an experimental analysis, The Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1232, 10.1086/261651 Carifio, 2001, Effects of diagnostic and prescriptive comments on the revising behaviors of community college students, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 109, 10.1080/10668920150218498 Chase, 1973, Perception in chess, Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55, 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 Chi, 1981, Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices, Cognitive Science, 5, 121, 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 Chiesi, 1979, Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 257, 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90146-4 Cho, K., Cho, M., & Hacker, D. (in press). Self-monitoring support for learning to write. Interactive Learning Environments. Cho, 2008, Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: an empirical investigation, Communications of the ACM, 51, 83, 10.1145/1325555.1325571 Cho, 2007, Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline, Computers and Education, 48, 409, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004 Cho, 2006, Commenting on writing: typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts, Written Communication, 23, 260, 10.1177/0741088306289261 Cho, 2006, Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives, Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 891, 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891 Clare, 2000 Cohen, 1989, The effect of distant audience on students' writing, American Educational Research Journal, 26, 143, 10.3102/00028312026002143 Cole, 1986, Towards good teaching by correspondence, Open Learning, 1, 16, 10.1080/0268051860010105 Couzijn, 1999, Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: effects on learning and transfer, Learning and Instruction, 9, 109, 10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00040-1 DiPardo, 1988, Peer response groups in the writing classroom: theoretic foundations and new directions, Review of Educational Research, 58, 119, 10.3102/00346543058002119 Faigley, 1981, Analyzing revision, College Composition and Communication, 32, 400, 10.2307/356602 Falchikov, 2000, Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks, Review of Educational Research, 70, 287, 10.3102/00346543070003287 Fitzgerald, 1987, Research on revision in writing, Review of Educational Research, 57, 481, 10.3102/00346543057004481 Fitzgerald, 1987, Teaching children about revision in writing, Cognition and Instruction, 4, 3, 10.1207/s1532690xci0401_1 Freedman, 1987 Graham, 2007, A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 Haswell, 2005, NCTE/CCCC's recent war on scholarship, Written Communication, 22, 198, 10.1177/0741088305275367 Hayes, 1987, Cognitive processes in revision, Vol. 2, 176 Hillocks, 1982, The interaction of instruction, teacher comment, and revision: teaching the composing process, Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 261 Holliway, 2004, Audience perspective in young writers' composing and revising: reading as the reader, 87 Kali, 2008, Assessing the assessors: added value in web-based multi-cycle peer assessment in higher education, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3, 3, 10.1142/S1793206808000434 Karabenick, 1996, Social influences on metacognition: effects of colearner questioning on comprehension monitoring, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 689, 10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.689 Karegianes, 1980, The effects of peer editing on the writing proficiency of low-achieving tenth grade students, Journal of Educational Research, 73, 203, 10.1080/00220671.1980.10885236 Kelley, 1996, Adult egocentrism: subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment, Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 157, 10.1006/jmla.1996.0009 MacArthur, 2007, Best practice in teaching evaluation and revision, 141 MacArthur, 1991, Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among students with learning disabilities, Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 61, 10.2307/1510373 MacArthur, 1991, Effects of a reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 201 McCutchen, 1987, Editing strategies and error correction in basic writing, Written Communication, 4, 139, 10.1177/0741088387004002002 Marsh, 1989, The peer review process used to evaluate manuscripts submitted to academic journals: interjudgmental reliability, Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 151, 10.1080/00220973.1989.10806503 Miyake, 1986, Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding, Cognitive Science, 10, 151, 10.1207/s15516709cog1002_2 Mumford, 1983, Social comparison theory and the evaluation of peer evaluations: a review and some applied implications, Personnel Psychology, 36, 867, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb00516.x National Commission on Writing in American Schools and Colleges Rucker, 2003, Assessing student learning outcomes: an investigation of the relationship among feedback measures, College Student Journal, 37, 400 Schneider, 1977, Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. detection, search, and attention, Psychological Review, 84, 1, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1 Schriver, 1990 Smith, 1997, The genre of the end comment: conventions in teacher responses to student writing, College Composition and Communication, 48, 249, 10.2307/358669 Sommers, 1980, Revision strategies of student writers and experienced writers, College Composition and Communication, 31, 378, 10.2307/356588 SparkNotes Strijbos, 2010, Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?, Learning and Instruction, 20, 291, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 Swaney, 1981 Topping, 1998, Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, 249, 10.3102/00346543068003249 Tversky, 1973, Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207, 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 Van Steendam, 2010, The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL, Learning and Instruction, 20, 316, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.009 Vedder, 1985 Zhu, 1995, Effects of training for peer response on students' comments and interaction, Written Communication, 12, 492, 10.1177/0741088395012004004