Student reflections on learning with challenging tasks: ‘I think the worksheets were just for practice, and the challenges were for maths’
Tóm tắt
The current study considered young students’ (7 and 8 years old) experiences and perceptions of mathematics lessons involving challenging (i.e. cognitively demanding) tasks. We used the Constant Comparative Method to analyse the interview responses (n = 73) regarding what work artefacts students were most proud of creating and why. Five themes emerged that characterised student reflections: enjoyment, effort, learning, productivity and meaningful mathematics. Overall, there was evidence that students embraced struggle and persisted when engaged in mathematics lessons involving challenging tasks and, moreover, that many students enjoyed the process of being challenged. In the second section of the paper, the lesson structure preferences of a subset of participants (n = 23) when learning with challenging tasks are considered. Overall, more students preferred the teach-first lesson structure to the task-first lesson structure, primarily because it activated their cognition to prepare them for work on the challenging task. However, a substantial minority of students (42 %) instead endorsed the task-first lesson structure, with several students explaining they preferred this structure precisely because it was so cognitively demanding. Other reasons for preferring the task-first structure included that it allowed the focus of the lesson to be on the challenging task and the subsequent discussion of student work. A key implication of these combined findings is that, for many students, work on challenging tasks appeared to remain cognitively demanding irrespective of the structure of the lesson.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baxter, J. A., & Williams, S. (2010). Social and analytic scaffolding in middle school mathematics: managing the dilemma of telling. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 7–26.
Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2011). A ‘task-centric approach’ to professional development: enhancing and sustaining mathematics teachers’ ability to implement cognitively challenging mathematical tasks. ZDM, 43(6–7), 965–977.
Cheeseman, J., Clarke, D.M., Roche, A., & Wilson, K. (2013). Teachers’ views of the challenging elements of a task. In V. Steinle, L. Ball & C. Bardini (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 154–161). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.
Clarke, D. M., & Clarke, B. A. (2003). Encouraging perseverance in elementary mathematics: a tale of two problems. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(4), 204–209.
Clarke, D. M., Cheeseman, J., Roche, A., & van der Schans, S. (2014). Teaching strategies for building student persistence on challenging tasks: insights emerging from two approaches to teacher professional learning. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(2), 46–70.
Darragh, L. (2013). Sticking with it or doing it quickly: what performances do we encourage in our mathematics learners? In V. Steinle, L. Ball & C. Bardini (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 218–225). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.
Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.
Glaser, B. G. (1969). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. In G. McCall & J. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation: a text and reader. Reading: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co..
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.
Hollingsworth, H., McCrae, B., & Lokan, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in Australia: results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring relationships between setting up complex tasks and opportunities to learn in concluding whole-class discussions in middle-grades mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646–682.
Ke, F. (2014). An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: a case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers and Education, 73, 26–39.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 381–395.
Lambert, R., & Stylianou, D. A. (2013). Posing cognitively demanding tasks to all students. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(8), 500–506.
Leikin, R., Levav-Waynberg, A., Gurevich, I., & Mednikov, L. (2006). Implementation of multiple solution connecting tasks: do students’ attitudes support teachers’ reluctance? Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 28(1), 1–22.
McClain, K. (2002). Teacher’s and students’ understanding: the role of tools and inscriptions in supporting effective communication. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2–3), 217–249.
Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (2002). Beyond motivation: middle school students’ perceptions of press for understanding in math. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(3), 373–391.
Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Lajoie, S. P., Di Leo, I., & Chevrier, M. (2015). The role of epistemic emotions in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 172–185.
NRC (National Research Council Staff). (1989). Everybody counts: a report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington: National Academies Press.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
Ridlon, C. L. (2009). Learning mathematics via a problem-centered approach: a two-year study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 188–225.
Russo, J. (2015). Teaching with challenging tasks: Two 'how many' problems. Prime Number, 30(4), 9–11.
Russo, J. (2016a). Teaching mathematics in primary schools with challenging tasks: the big (not so) friendly giant. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 21(3), 8–15.
Russo, J. (2016b). Teaching with challenging tasks: baskets and boundaries. Prime Number, 31(3), 7–9.
Russo, J. (2016c). Teaching with challenging tasks: hopping with fiona the frog. Prime Number, 31(2), 10–11.
Russo, J., & Hopkins, S. (2017a). Task-First vs Teach-First: Does lesson structure matter for student mathematical performance when teaching with challenging tasks? Manuscript submitted for publication.
Russo, J., & Hopkins, S. (2017b). Class challenging tasks: Using cognitive Load theory to inform the design of challenging mathematical tasks. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 22(1).
Russo, J., & Hopkins, S. (in press). How does lesson structure impact teachers’ willingness to teach with Challenging Tasks? Mathematics Teacher Education and Development.
Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 119–150.
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: an analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. A. (2009). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sullivan, P., & Mornane, A. (2013). Exploring teachers’ use of, and students’ reactions to, challenging mathematics tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25, 1–21.
Sullivan, P., Tobias, S., & McDonough, A. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 81–99.
Sullivan, P., Clarke, D. M., & Clarke, B. (2009). Converting mathematics tasks to learning opportunities: an important aspect of knowledge for mathematics teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(1), 85–105.
Sullivan, P., Cheeseman, J., Michels, D., Mornane, A., Clarke, D.M., Roche, A., & Middleton, J. (2011). Challenging mathematics tasks: what they are and how to use them. Paper presented at the Maths is multidimensional (Mathematical Association of Victoria), Melbourne, Australia: MAV.
Sullivan, P., Aulert, A., Lehmann, A., Hislop, B., Shepherd, O., & Stubbs, A. (2013). Classroom culture, challenging mathematical tasks and student persistence. In V. Steinle, L. Ball & C. Bardini (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 618–625). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.
Sullivan, P., Askew, M., Cheeseman, J., Clarke, D. M., Mornane, A., Roche, A., & Walker, N. (2014). Supporting teachers in structuring mathematics lessons involving challenging tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(2), 1–18.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5.
Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: a reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115–121.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tzur, R. (2008). A researcher perplexity: why do mathematical tasks undergo metamorphosis in teacher hands? In O. Figuras, J. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano & A. Sepulveda (Eds.), Proceedings of 32nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 139–147). Morelia, Mexico: PME.
Valås, H., & Søvik, N. (1993). Variables affecting students’ intrinsic motivation for school mathematics: two empirical studies based on Deci and Ryan’s theory on motivation. Learning and Instruction, 3(4), 281–298.
Westwood, P. (2011). The problem with problems: potential difficulties in implementing problem-based learning as the core method in primary school mathematics. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16(1), 5–18.
Wilhelm, A. G. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ enactment of cognitively demanding tasks: investigating links to teachers’ knowledge and conceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(5), 636–674.
Woolley, M. E., Strutchens, M. E., Gilbert, M. C., & Martin, W. G. (2010). Mathematics success of black middle school students: direct and indirect effects of teacher expectations and reform practices. Negro Educational Review, 61, 41–59.