Student interaction discourse moves: characterizing and visualizing student discourse patterns

Atkins, A. (2001). Sinclair and Coulthard’s IRF model in a one-to-one classroom: An analysis (p. 24)

Barron, B. (2003). When Smart Groups Fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1

Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications Of Postmodernism For Science, Or, Science As Progressive Discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2901_1

Brown, A. L. (1994). The Advancement of Learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176856 JSTOR.

Brown, P., Sawyer, K., Frey, R., Luesse, S., & Gealy, D. (2010). What are they talking about? Findings from an analysis of the discourse in Peer-Led Team Learning in general chemistry. In Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings—9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 1, p. 777). https://doi.dx.org/https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2010.1.773

Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1439–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6

Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475

Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information. Instructional Science, 29(6), 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012099909179

Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001

Cole, R. S., Becker, N., & Stanford, C. (2014). Discourse Analysis as a Tool To Examine Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. In Tools of Chemistry Education Research (Vol. 1166, pp. 61–81). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2014-1166.ch004

Coulthard, M. (Ed.). (1992). Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis (1st ed.). Routledge.

Criswell, B. A. (2012). Reducing the degrees of freedom in chemistry classroom conversations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP00002D

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3%3c287::AID-SCE1%3e3.0.CO;2-A

Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2

Eren-Sisman, E. N., Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2018). The effect of peer-led team learning on undergraduate engineering students’ conceptual understanding, state anxiety, and social anxiety. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00201G

Foxman, D., & Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. The Western Political Quarterly, 26(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/446833

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Garoutte, M, Mahoney, A. (2015). Introductory Chemistry: A Guided Inquiry. Wiley.

Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Chapter 4: Discourse Analysis, Learning, and Social Practice: A Methodological Study. Review of Research in Education, 23(1), 119–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X023001119

Gee, J. P. (2015). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722511

González-Howard, M. (2019). Exploring the utility of social network analysis for visualizing interactions during argumentation discussions. Science Education, 103(3), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21505

Hamnett, H. J., McKie, A. E., & Morrison, C. (2018). Postgraduate students’ attitudes towards group work: Experiences within a forensic chemistry programme. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1240–1252. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00126J

Harney, O. M., Hogan, M. J., & Quinn, S. (2017). Investigating the effects of peer to peer prompts on collaborative argumentation, consensus and perceived efficacy in collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 307–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9263-9

Kaartinen, S., & Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Collaborative inquiry and the construction of explanations in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00004-4

Keefer, M. W., Zeitz, C. M., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Judging the Quality of Peer-Led Student Dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_03

Kulatunga, U., Moog, R. S., & Lewis, J. E. (2014). Use of Toulmin’s Argumentation Scheme for Student Discourse to Gain Insight About Guided Inquiry Activities in College Chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(5), 78–86. JSTOR.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Pub. Corp. Norwood.

Loes, C. N., An, B. P., Saichaie, K., & Pascarella, E. T. (2017). Does Collaborative Learning Influence Persistence to the Second Year of College? The Journal of Higher Education, 88(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1243942

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. PubMed.

Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137

Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853

Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Wiley.

Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1

Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing Talk Moves as Tools: In L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue (pp. 347–362). American Educational Research Association; JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1s474m1.30

Moon, A., Stanford, C., Cole, R., & Towns, M. (2016). The nature of students’ chemical reasoning employed in scientific argumentation in physical chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(2), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00207A

Moon, A., Stanford, C., Cole, R., & Towns, M. (2017). Decentering: A Characteristic of Effective Student-Student Discourse in Inquiry-Oriented Physical Chemistry Classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 829–836. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00856

National Research Council. (2015). Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18687

Nichols, J. D. (1996). The effects of cooperative learning on student achievement and motivation in a high school geometry class. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0031

Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation, and Learning, 33(3), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001

Olson, S., & Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Executive Office of the President: Report to the President.

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative. Critical Discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944

Repice, M. D., Keith Sawyer, R., Hogrebe, M. C., Brown, P. L., Luesse, S. B., Gealy, D. J., & Frey, R. F. (2016). Talking through the problems: A study of discourse in peer-led small groups. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(3), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00154D

Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. (2015). The Influence of Group Dynamics on Collaborative Scientific Argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11, 335–351. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1338a

Ryu, S., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Coding Classroom Interactions for Collective and Individual Engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1001891

Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2011). A Comparison of the Collaborative Scientific Argumentation Practices of Two High and Two Low Performing Groups. Research in Science Education, 41, 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9146-9

Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421

Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.

VERBI Software. (2020). MAXQDA 2020 (Version 2020) [Software]. maxqda.com

Summers, M., & Volet, S. (2010). Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: Evidence from observations and self-reports. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(4), 473–492. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/23421483

Talanquer, V. (2014). DBER and STEM education reform: Are we up to the challenge? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(6), 809–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21162

Talanquer, V., & Pollard, J. (2010). Let’s teach how we think instead of what we know. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005349J

Tannen, D. (2009). Framing and Face: The Relevance of The Presentation of Self to Linguistic Discourse Analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(4), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200404

Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., & Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117

Towns, M. (1998). How Do I Get My Students To Work Together? Getting Cooperative Learning Started in Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p67

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Warfa, A.-R.M., Roehrig, G. H., Schneider, J. L., & Nyachwaya, J. (2014). Collaborative discourse and the modeling of solution chemistry with magnetic 3D physical models – impact and characterization. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00119B

Warfa, A.-R.M., Nyachwaya, J., & Roehrig, G. (2018). The influences of group dialog on individual student understanding of science concepts. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0142-3

Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible sociocultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00013-4

Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the Classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. (pp. xx, 370). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605895

Wilson, S. B., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2016). Small Groups, Significant Impact: A Review of Peer-Led Team Learning Research with Implications for STEM Education Researchers and Faculty. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(10), 1686–1702. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00862

Young, K. K., & Talanquer, V. (2013). Effect of Different Types of Small-Group Activities on Students’ Conversations. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400049a