Student engagement and foreign language learning through online social networks

Abdous, M, Camarena, M, & Facer, BR (2009). MALL Technology: Use of Academic Podcasting in the Foreign Language Classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76–95. doi:10.1017/S0958344009000020. Ajjan, H, & Hartshorne, R (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 71–80. Alm, A (2006). CALL for autonomy, competence and relatedness: Motivating language learning in Web 2.0. JALT CALL Journal, 2(3), 29–38. Anderson, P (2007) What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Retrieved November 4, 2011, from www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf Annetta, LA, Minogue, J, Holmes, SY, & Cheng, MT (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53, 74–85. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.020. Astin, A (1984). Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308. Astin, AW (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Baker, EL, Gearhart, M, & Herman, JL (1990). The Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow: 1989 Evaluation study (Report to Apple Computer, Inc.). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation/Center for TechnologyAssessment. Ball, I, & Perry, C (2011). Differences in student engagement: investigating the role of the dominant cognitive processes preferred by engineering and education students. Education research international, 2011, 1–8. Bandura, A, & Walters, RH (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Baralt, M (2009). The Use of Social Networking Sites for Language Practice and Learning. Ilha Do Desterro, Recent Research in SLA, 59. Brazil: Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Becker, GS (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Benek-Rivera, J, & Matthews, VE (2004). Active learning with jeopardy: Students ask the questions. Journal of Management Education, 28, 104–118. Bertin, J-C, Grave, P, & Narcy-Combes, J-P (2010). Second-language distance learning and teaching: theoretical perspectives and didactic ergonomics. USA: IGI Global. Blattner, G, & Fiori, M (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises andpossibilities. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL), 6(1), 17–28. Boster, FJ, Meyer, GS, Roberto, AJ, & Inge, CC (2002). A report on the effect of the United streaming Application on Educational Performance. Cometrika, Inc., Baseline Research, LLC., & Fannville VA Longwood University Boyd, D (2007). Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning – Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume. Cambridge: MIT Press. Brady, KP, Holcomb, LB, & Smith, BV (2010). The Use of Alternative Social Networking Sites in Higher Educational Settings: A Case Study of the E-Learning Benefits of Ning in Education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 1–20. Brick, B (2011a). How effective are web 2.0 language learning sites in facilitating language learning? Compass: The Journal of Learning and Teaching at the University of Greenwich, 3, 57–63. Brick, B (2011b). Social Networking Sites and Language Learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 2(3), 18–31. Retrieved from www.igi-global.com. Chan, TS, & Ahern, TC (1999). Targeting motivation--Adapting flow theory to instructional design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(2), 151–163. Chen, PSD, Lambert, AD, & Guidry, KR (2010). Engaging online learners: the impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(5), 1222–1232. Clark C, & Gruba P (2010). The use of social networking sites for foreign language learning: Anautoethno graphic study of Livemocha. In: Proceedings of the ASCILITE Conference on Curriculum, & Transformation for an Unknown Future, Sydney, Australia (pp.164–173). Retrieved November 4, 2011, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cameron_Clark2/publication/229001225_The_use_of_social_networking_sites_for_foreign_language_learning_An_autoethnographic_study_of_Livemocha/links/0deec53887ee646ee8000000.pdf. Cohen, J (1960). A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. Cole, M (2009). Using wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers and Education, 52, 141–146. Davies, J (2012). Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers & Education, 59, 19–29. Deci, EL, & Ryan, RM (2011). Self Determination Theory. Accessed on 6 Nov 2011 from www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/questionnaires. Dixon, S, & Black, L (1996). Vocal point: A collaborative, student run online newspaper. In E. J. Valauskas & M. Ertel (Eds.), The Internet for teachers and school library media specialists: Today’s applications tomorrow’s prospects (pp. 147–158). New York: Neal- Schuman Publishers, Inc. Dooly, M (2007). Joining Forces: Promoting metaglinguistic awareness through computer-supported collaborative learning. Language Awareness, 16(1), 57–74. Dunne, E, Wren, J, & Janes, A (2012). Using Video and Wiki Technology to Increase Student Engagement with Learning in Large International Cohorts in UK. Higher Education, 6(Part A), 165–194. Dwyer, DC (1994). Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow: What we’ve learned. Educational Leadership, 51(April), 4–10. Edirisingha, P, Rizzi, C, Nie, M, & Rothwell, L (2007). Podcasting to provide teaching and learning support for an undergraduate module on English language and communication. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 87–107. Educational Testing Service (2011). TOEFL: test of English as a foreign language, test of written English. For comparing TOEFL scores. Accessed on November 6, 2011 from www.ets.org/toefl/institutions/scores/compare/. Espuny. C, Gonzalez, J, Llexixa, M& Gisbert M (2011). University Students Attitudes Towards and Expectations of the Educational Use of Social Networks. In: “The Impact of Social Networks on Teaching and Learning” [online monograph]. Revista de Universidad y SociedaddelConocimiento (RUSC). 8, 186–199. Accessed on November 6, 2011 from http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v8n1-espuny-gonzalez-lleixa-gisbert/v8n1-espuny-gonzalez-lleixa-gisbert-eng. Gardner, RC, & Lambert, WE (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers. Godwin-Jones, R (2006). Emerging technologies: tag clouds in the blogosphere: electronic literacy and social networking. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 8–15. Green, J, Martin, AJ, & Marsh, HW (2007). Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding ofmultidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 269–279. Greenhow, C, Robelia, E, & Hughes, J (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246–259. Grosseck, G (2009). To use or not to use Web 2.0 in higher education? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 478–482. Hamid, S, Chang, S, & Kurnia, S (2009). Identifying the use of online social networking in higher education. Proceedings ascilite Auckland (2009). Accessed on November 6, 2011 from http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/auckland09/procs/hamid-poster.pdf. Harrison, MS, & Thomas, KM (2009). The hidden prejudice in selection: A research investigation on skin color bias. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 727–744. Heiberger, G, & Harper, R (2008). Have you Facebooked Astin lately? Using technology to increase student involvement. New Directions for Student Services, 124, 19–35. Hu S, & Kuh GD (2001). Computing experience and good practices in undergraduate education: Does the degree of campus “wiredness” matter? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(49). Accessed on November 6, 2011 from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/epaa/article/view/378. Junco, R (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58, 162–171. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004. Junco, R, Heiberger, G, & Loken, E (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132. Kabilan, MK, Norlida, A, & MohdJafre, ZA (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in Institutions of Higher Learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187. Kikuchi, K, & Otsuka, T (2008). Investigating the use of social networking services in Japanese EFL classrooms. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(1), 40–52. Kuh, GD (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10–17. 66. Lee, J, Cho, H, Gay, G, Davidson, B, & Ingraffea, T (2003). Technology acceptance and social networks in distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 50–62. Lenhart, A, & Madden, M (2007). Social networking websites and teens: An overview. Pew Internet and American Life Project report. Retrieved January 24, 2008 from http://htlab.psy.unipd.it/uploads/Pdf/lectures/technology_for_young/Social%20Networking%20Websites%20and%20Teens%20text.pdf. Little, AW (2003). Motivating Learning and the Development of Human Capital. Compare, 33(4), 437–452. Lomicka, L, & Lord, G (2009). Introduction to social networking, collaboration, and Web 2.0 tools. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networks and online collaboration in foreign language learning. San Marcos: CALICO. Malhiwsky, DR (2010). Student achievement using Web2.0 technologies: a mixed methods study. Theses and Dissertations from the College of Education and Human Sciences. Paper 58. Accessed on November 6, 2011 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss/58. Martin, AJ (2008). Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 239–269. Mazer, JP, Murphy, RE, & Simonds, CJ (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook”: the effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affectivelearning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17. Mazer, JP, Murphy, RE, & Simonds, CJ (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure viaFacebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 175–183. doi:10.1080/17439880902923655. Mills, NA (2009). Facebook and the use of social networking tools to enhance language learner motivation and engagement. In Paper presented at the Northeast Association for Language Learning Technology (NEALLT) Conference. New Haven: Yale University. 30–31 October. Motteram, G, & Sharma, P (2009). Blending learning in a web 2.0 world. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(2), 83–96. Nelson Laird, TF, & Kuh, GD (2005). Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 211–233. O’Bryan, A, & Hegelheimer, V (2007). Integrating CALL into the Classroom: the Role of Podcasting in an ESL Listening Strategies Course. ReCALL, 19(2), 162–180. Pascarella, ET, & Terenzini, PT (2005). How College Affects Students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Patera, M, Draper, S, & Naef, M (2008). Exploring Magic Cottage: A virtual reality environment for stimulating children’s imaginative writing. Interactive Learning Environments, 16, 245–263. doi:10.1080/10494820802114093. Ramaswami, R (2008). The Prose of Blogging (and a Few Cons, Too). T.H.E Journal, 35(11), 21–25. Redecker C, Ala-Mutka K, & Punie Y (2010). Learning 2.0 - The Impact of Social Media on Learning in Europe, European Commission JRC 56958 – Joint Research Centre –Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, retrieved on November 6, 2011 from: http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC56958.pdf Redston, C, & Cunningham, G (2006). Face2face Intermediate Student’s Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reynol, J (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162–171. Roblyer, MD, McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Vince Witty, J. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 134–140. Rosenshine, B (1982). Teaching functions in instructional programs. Washington: Paper presented at the National Institute of Education’s National Invitational Conference on Research on ‘reaching: Implications for Practice. Ross, CE, Orr, S, Sisic, M, Arseneault, JM, Simmering, MG, & Orr, RR (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578–586. Routman, R (1991). Invitations: Changing as teachers and learners K-12. Toronto: Irwin Publishing. Ryan, RM, & Deci, EL (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020. Sandhouse, J (2012). Using Facebook to Enhance Academic Advising; Retrieved on November 4, 2011 from http://www.gatorjbone.com/assets/Using%20Facebook%20to%20Enhance%20Adademic%20Advising.pdf Sarason, Y, & Banbury, C (2004). Active learning facilitated by using a game-show format or who doesn‘t. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 509–518. Schlechty, PC (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Selwyn, N (2011). ‘Social media in higher education’ in The Europa World of Learning (62nd ed.). London: Routledge. Silius, K, Miilumäki, T, Huhtamäki, J, Tebest, T, Meriläinen, J, & Pohjolainen, S (2010). Students’ Motivations for Social Media Enhanced Studying and Learning. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 2(1), 51–67. Soares, D (2008). Understanding class blogs as a toll for language development. Language Teaching Research, 12(4), 517–533. Swan, K, van’t Hooft, M, Kratcoski, A, & Darlene. (2005). Uses and Effects of Mobile Computing Devices in K-8 Classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 99–112. Thorne, SL, & Reinhardt, J (2008). “Bridging activities,” new media literacies and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25, 558–572. Wang, Q, Woo, HL, Quek, CL, Yang, Y, & Liu, M (2011). Using the Facebook group as learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428–438. Weiner, B (2000). Interpersonal and intrapersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 1–14. Wentzel, KR (1992). Motivation and achievement in adolescence: A multiple goals perspective. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp. 287–306). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Wise LZ, Skues J, Williams B (2011) Facebook in higher education promotes social but not academic engagement. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011, (1332–1342). Accessed on November 4, 2011 from www.ascilite.org/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Wise-full.pdf. Woolfolk, A, & Margetts, K (2007). Educational psychology. NSW, Australia: Pearson Prentice Hall. Zyngier, D (2011). (Re) conceptualising risk: left numb and unengaged and lost in a no-man’s-land or what (seems to) work for at-risk students. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(2), 211–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603110902781427.