Structural Modeling in Marketing: Review and Assessment

Marketing Science - Tập 25 Số 6 - Trang 604-616 - 2006
Pradeep K. Chintagunta1, Tülin Erdem2, Peter E. Rossi1, Michel Wedel3
1Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 1101 East 58th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637
2Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, Tish Hall, 40 West 4th Street, Room 913, New York, New York 10012
3Robert H. Smith School of Business, 3303 Van Munching Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-1815

Tóm tắt

The recent marketing literature reflects a growing interest in structural models, stemming from (1) the desire to test a variety of behavioral theories with market data, and (2) recent developments that facilitate estimation of and inference for these models. Whether one should always go through the effort of developing such tightly parameterized models with the associated computational burden of estimating them and whether it pays off to make strict behavioral assumptions in terms of better decisions remain open questions. To shed some light on these issues, we provide examples of structural approaches to consumer choice and demand as well as examples where the goal is to study the nature of competition in the marketplace. From that review comes our discussion of issues in the development and application of structural models, including their estimation, testing, and validation, their applicability in the practice of marketing, and their usefulness for normative as well as descriptive purposes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/1468-2354.t01-2-00098

10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00055-4

Amman H., 1995, Handbook of Computational Economics, 1

10.2307/2555829

10.2307/2171802

10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1121.16565

Bound J., 1995, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 90, 443

Bowden R. J., 1984, Instrumental Variables

10.1287/mksc.10.4.297

10.1287/mksc.12.2.184

10.1023/A:1023534028314

Chintagunta P. K., 2004, Assessing Marketing Startegy Performance

Deaton A., 1980, Amer. Econom. Rev., 70, 312

10.1287/mksc.1030.0041

10.1023/A:1020266620866

10.1007/s11129-005-1177-6

10.1080/01621459.1995.10476620

10.1177/002224379803500305

10.1287/mksc.15.1.1

Erdem T., 2003, Quant. Marketing Econom., 1, 15

10.1007/s11129-005-0269-7

10.1007/s11002-005-5887-z

10.1111/j.1430-9134.1992.00277.x

10.1287/mksc.1030.0032

10.1287/mksc.15.3.262

10.2307/1911462

10.2307/1905563

10.1111/1468-0262.00272

10.2307/1913464

Heckman J., 1981, Studies in Labor Markets

10.1287/mksc.11.2.133

10.1016/S0167-8116(01)00031-3

10.1086/209701

10.1287/mksc.14.3.G161

10.1287/mksc.21.3.229.143

10.1287/mksc.11.3.266

Lewbel A., 1989, Econometrica, 104, 621

10.1016/S0167-2231(76)80003-6

Lucas R. E., 1987, Models of Business Cycles

10.1509/jmkr.41.4.467.47005

McFadden D., 1974, Frontiers of Econometrics

10.1287/mksc.22.1.58.12849

10.1023/B:QMEC.0000027775.65062.50

10.1287/mksc.21.4.435.136

10.1287/mksc.1040.0101

10.2307/2600994

10.1017/CCOL0521444608.005

Reiss P. C., 2002, Handbook Econometrics

Rotemberg J., 1986, Amer. Econom. Rev., 76, 390

10.1287/mksc.15.3.280

10.1017/CCOL0521444608.004

10.1287/mksc.14.4.395

10.1287/mksc.1040.0060

10.1023/B:QMEC.0000004843.41279.f3

10.2307/2171753

Stoker T., 1993, J. Econom. Literature, 31, 1827

10.1287/mksc.20.1.42.10196

10.1287/mksc.1040.0074

10.1287/mksc.1040.0110

10.1509/jmkr.40.4.389.19392

10.1287/mnsc.45.4.499

10.1007/978-1-4615-4651-1

10.1086/209064

10.1023/B:QMEC.0000003327.55605.26