Strategy disclosure in annual reports across Europe: a study on differences between five countries

Emerald - Tập 17 Số 4 - Trang 352-366 - 2005
SiccoSantema1, MarijkeHoekert1, Jeroenvan de Rijt1, Aswinvan Oijen1
1Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis article aims to focus on strategy disclosure in annual reports across Europe and to try to establish whether national culture and national corporate governance features have an influence on the extent to which companies disclose their strategy. The research was conducted to fulfil three main purposes: to build a model for measuring strategy disclosure; to find reasons for differences in strategy disclosure across countries; and to test whether there are indeed differences in the extent to which strategy is disclosed.Design/methodology/approachThe extent to which companies disclose their strategy is predicted on the basis of comparative management and corporate governance literature. This prediction is subsequently tested on ten criteria (describing corporate strategy). The empirical results were statistically analysed by using Manova and linear regression.FindingsThe main conclusion is drawn that national differences in corporate governance and culture do influence the extent to which companies disclose their corporate strategy.Research limitations/implicationsThe research sample consists of the annual reports of five European countries. Future research could be extended into a broader sample. Furthermore, possible influence of other elements on the extent to which companies disclose their strategy (besides the control variables already taken into account) could be considered.Practical implicationsPractical implications for managers from this conclusion are that, in order to keep the stakeholders satisfied, the company should look at their demands for disclosure when deciding on a strategy for disclosure.Originality/valueThe link between national differences and strategy disclosure has not been specified so clearly in the literature before, and therefore can be seen as the largest contribution of this study.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abrahamson, E. and Amir, E. (1996), “The information content of the President's letter to shareholders”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 1157‐82.

Ansoff, I. (1965), Corporate Strategy, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Elliott, R. and Jacobson, P. (1994), “Costs and benefits of business information disclosure”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 80‐96.

Hofstede, G. (1983), “The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 75‐89.

Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture's Consequences, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Hussein, M. (1996), “A comparative study of cultural influences on reporting in the USA and The Netherlands”, The International Journal of Accounting., Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 95‐120.

Kohut, G. and Segars, A. (1992), “The President's letter to stockholders: an examination of corporate communication strategy”, The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 7‐21.

LaPorte, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (1999), “Corporate ownership around the world”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 471‐518.

Levitt, T. (1960), “Marketing myopia”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 45‐56.

Porter, M. (1980), Competitive Strategy, The Free Press, New York, NY.

Santema, S. and Van de Rijt, J. (2001), “Strategy disclosure in Dutch annual reports”, European Management Journal, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 101‐8.

Stanton, P. and Stanton, J. (2002), “Corporate annual reports: research perspectives used”, Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 478‐500.

Yuthas, K., Rogers, R. and Dillard, J. (2002), “Communicative action and corporate annual reports”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 141‐57.

Abell, D.F. (1980), Defining the Business: The Starting‐Point of Strategic Planning, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Andrews, K. (1971), The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Dow Jones Irwin, Homewood, IL.

Daft, R. (1998), Organization Theory and Design, 6th ed., South Western College Publications, Cincinnati, OH.

Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. (2002), Exploring Corporate Strategy, 6th ed., Prentice‐Hall Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.

Kearnan, M., Heimann, B. and Hanges, P. (1991), “Effects of goal choice, strategy choice and feedback sources on goal acceptance, performance and subsequent goals”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 21 No. 9, pp. 713‐33.

Lee, S. (1981), Management by Multiple Objectives, Petrocelli Books, New York, NY.

Santema, S. (2002), Visie op Beleid, Scenter, Baarn.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 17 Số 4

352-366

Thông tin tác giả