Strategic concerns and capability impeders

Emerald - Tập 15 Số 10 - Trang 4-29 - 1995
VicGilgeous1
1University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Tóm tắt

Evidence points to the need for a coherent, well‐communicated manufacturing strategy which establishes the best possible link between the competitive needs of the business and what needs to be done at the operational level in order to provide the business with a sustainable advantage over the competition. Presents a process of manufacturing strategy development which links the strategic needs of the business to the operational level in order to determine the operational areas of strategic concern in the company. Examines the effectiveness of a company′s capabilities, using a methodology for identifying the main impeders to improvements being made with respect to these particular areas of strategic concern.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Hill, T.J., Manufacturing Strategy, Macmillan, London, 1993.

2. Platts, K.W. and Gregory, M.J., “Manufacturing audit in the process of strategy formulation”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 10No. 9, 1990, p. 5.

3. Hayes, R.H. and Wheelwright, S.C., Restoring Our Competitive Edge, Competing through Manufacturing, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1984.

4. Slack, N., The Manufacturing Advantage, Mercury, London, 1991.

5. Gunn, T.G., Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage: Becoming a World Class Manufacturer, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

6. New, C.C., Competitive Edge Manufacturing Workshop Participant Documentation, School of Management, Cranfield/Department of Trade & Industry, London, 1987.

7. Hayes, R.H., Wheelwright, S.C. and Clark K.B., Dynamic Manufacturing in Creating the Learning Organisation, The Free Press, New York, NY, 1988.

8. Bolton, E., “A learning approach towards the process of manufacturing strategy development”, BSc dissertation, Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Operations Management, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, 1993.

9. Granville, V.A., “An investigation of planning impedance; including the formulation of a means of identifying blockages to effective planning”, MSc Dissertation, Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Operations Management, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, 1993.

10. Basil, D.C. and Cook, C.W., The Management of Change, McGraw‐Hill, London, 1974.

11. Mullins, L.J., Management of Organizational Behaviour, 2nd ed., Pitman, London, 1992.

12. Handy, C., Understanding Organisations, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1985.

13. Francis, D. and Woodcock, M., Unblocking Your Organization, Gower, Aldershot, 1990.

14. Peters, T. and Waterman, P., In Search of Excellence, Harper & Row, New York, NY, 1990.

15. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY, 1980.

16. Fitton, P.A., “The effective organisation and an investigation with respect to company X”, BSc dissertation, Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Operations Management, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, 1993.

17. Pearson, A.E., “Muscle‐build the organization”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 65 No. 4, 1987, pp. 49‐55.

18. Storey, J., “Management development: a literature review and implications for future research – part 1: conceptualisations and practices”, Personnel Review, Vol. 18 No. 6, 1989, pp. 3‐19.

19. Grinyer, P.H., Mayes, D.G. and McKiermon, P., Sharpbenders: The Secrets of Unleashing Corporate Potential, Blackwell, Oxford, 1988.

20. Burnes, B. and Weekes, B., AMT: A Strategy for Success?, National Economic Development Office, London, 1989.

21. Burnes, B., “Managerial competence and new technology: don′t shoot the piano player – he′s doing his best”, Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 10 No. 2, 1991, pp. 91‐109.