Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non‐Family Businesses*

Journal of Management Studies - Tập 45 Số 1 - Trang 51-78 - 2008
Danny Miller1,2, Isabelle Le Breton‐Miller2, Barry Scholnick2
1HEC Montreal and
2University of Alberta

Tóm tắt

abstract Two major perspectives can be construed in the literature concerning the nature of family owned businesses (FOBs). The first implies that these enterprises have unique characteristics of stewardship. FOB owners are said to care deeply about the long‐term prospects of the business, in large part because their family's fortune, reputation and future are at stake. Their stewardship is said to be manifested by unusual devotion to the continuity of the company, by more assiduous nurturing of a community of employees, and by seeking out closer connections with customers to sustain the business. The second perspective is less flattering. It proposes that FOBs are unusually subject to stagnation: they are said to face unique resource restrictions, embrace conservative strategies, eschew growth, and be doomed to short lives. This paper develops and examines the merits of the two perspectives, neither of which has been systematically articulated or researched. It does so in an empirical study of only small firms that are owned and managed by their founder. Within this sample, it compares firms that are FOBs, that is, family owned and managed, with non‐FOBs, that is, owned and managed by a founder with no other relative involved in the business. The findings show significant support for all three aspects of the stewardship perspective of FOBs, and no support for any elements of the stagnation perspective.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1108/10878570410576704

Allouche J., 1997, Le retour triomphant du capitalisme familial’, L’expansion: Management Review, 85, 92

10.1111/1540-6261.00567

10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x

10.2307/258189

10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00045.x

10.1177/014920639101700108

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199705)18:3<297::AID-JOB805>3.0.CO;2-D

10.1016/0883-9026(87)90020-6

10.1086/261646

10.1257/jep.20.2.73

10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1

10.1080/03585522.1999.10419802

10.1080/00076799300000133

10.4159/9780674029385

10.1080/00076799300000127

10.1016/S1047-8310(98)90005-0

Covin J. G., 2001, Strategic Entrepreneurship

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00117.x

Danco L., 1975, Beyond Survival: A Business Owner's Guide for Success

10.2307/259291

10.1080/00076798800000051

10.2307/259223

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00311.x

Demsetz H., 1988, The Organization of Economic Activity Series, Vol. 1: Ownership, Control, and the Firm

10.2307/258013

10.1177/031289629101600103

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00149.x

Eddleston K. A., 2008, Resource configuration in family firms: linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance, Journal of Management Studies, 45, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00717.x

Fear J., 1997, Creating Modern Capitalism, 185

Fombrun C., 1996, Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00387.x

10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00459.x

Gersick K. E., 1997, Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business

10.1111/j.1467-6486.1985.tb00242.x

10.2307/3069338

Gomez‐Mejia L. R., 2007, Family owned firms: risk loving or risk averse, Administrative Science Quarterly

Grassby R., 2000, Kinship and Capitalism

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1990.00023.x

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3

10.1177/104225879001500105

James H., 2006, Family Capitalism, 10.4159/9780674039094

Kang D., 2000, Family Ownership and Performance in Public Corporations: A Study of the U.S. Fortune 500, 1982–1994

10.1177/104225870002500202

10.4159/harvard.9780674498150

Kirzner I. M., 1979, Perception, Opportunity, and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship

10.1177/104225879301800101

10.1017/S002205070009032X

Lansberg I., 1999, Succeeding Generations: Realizing the Dream of Families in Business

10.1111/0022-1082.00115

Lazonick W., 1986, The Decline of the British Economy, 18

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00147.x

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00071.x

10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00673.x

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1991.00303.x

10.1080/713999227

10.1002/smj.313

10.2307/256492

10.2307/258792

10.1111/0447-2778.00004

10.1002/smj.316

10.1177/1476127003001001222

Miller D., 2005, Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses

10.1016/j.lrp.2005.09.001

10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1389

Miller D., 2007, Journal of Corporate Finance

10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00015

10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00010-4

Moscetello L., 1990, The Pitcairns want you, Family Business Magazine, 3

10.2307/2667126

Pavan R., 1973, Strategy and Structure of the Italian Enterprise

Pollard S., 1965, The Genesis of Modern Management

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1997.00135.x

Pruitt B., 1999, Timken: From Missouri to Mars – A Century of Leadership in Manufacturing

10.1108/00400910210449286

10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00054-5

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00107.x

10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x

10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00083-6

10.1177/002224299505900306

10.1177/0092070300281011

Spector R., 1995, The Nordstrom Way: The Inside Story of America's #1 Customer Service Company

Stevenson H., 1999, New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur

10.1111/j.1741-6248.1992.00043.x

10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00450.x

10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005

10.1057/9780230505995

Weber J., 2003, Family Inc, Business Week, 100

10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00369.x

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1087::AID-SMJ71>3.0.CO;2-Z

10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00057-0