Stereochemistry of nucleic acids and their constituents. IV. Allowed and preferred conformations of nucleosides, nucleoside mono‐, di‐, tri‐, tetraphosphates, nucleic acids and polynucleotides

Biopolymers - Tập 7 Số 6 - Trang 821-860 - 1969
M. Sundaralingam1
1Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Tóm tắt

AbstractA uniform notation and convention is suggested to describe the torsional angles in nucleic acids and their derivatives. The torsional angle χ, relating the stereochemistry of the base with respect to the sugar, shows more variation for the β‐purine glycosides than for the β‐pyrimidine glycosides. This variation is attributed to the fact that the β‐purine derivatives may form intramolecular O(5′)‐H…N(3) hydrogen bonding. The χ values for the α‐purine and α‐pyrimidine glycosides show preference for the –syn‐clinal (or anti) conformation. The mode of puckering of the sugar also influences the χ value. The various possible conformations for the furanose ring are described by the torsional angles τ0 τ1, τ2, τ3, τ4, about the five ring bonds. From an analysis of the torsional angles (ω, ϕ, ψ, ψ′, ϕ′, ω′) about the sugar phosphate bonds in the x‐ray structures of the known nucleosides, nucleotides, phosphodiesters, nucleic acids, and related compounds, and from a consideration of molecular models, it is found that the possible conformations for the backbone of helical nucleic acids is strikingly limited. Most importantly, the preferred conformation of the nucleotide unit in poly nucleotides and nucleic acids turns out to be the same as that found for the nucleotide in the crystal structure. It is observed that base “stacking” is a consequence of the restricted backbone conformation. The torsional angles are illustrated in the form of conformational “wheels”. Interrelation between the torsion angles about successive pairs of sugar‐phosphate bonds are presented in the form of conformational maps: ω,ϕ; ϕ,ψ; ψ.ψ′; ψ′,ϕ′; ϕ′,ω′; ω′,ω. The ω′,ω map shows the perferred conformations about the inter‐nucleotide bonds of right‐ and left‐handed helices and the possible conformations of phosphodiesters. The preferred conformation of the pyrophosphate and triphosphate is that in which the phosphate oxygens display a staggered arrangement when viewed along the P–P axis. A plausible structure and conformation for the ATPM2− backbound complex is presented. This structure differs from that proposed by SzentGyorgi in that the metal (only transition metals are considered here) is not bound to the NH2 nitrogen of adenine, but rather is simultaneously bound to N(7) of the ring and three phosphates (α, β, γ), or N(7) of the ring and two phosphates (β, γ). The remaining metal coordination may be satisfied by solvent–metal or enzyme–metal bonds.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1107/S0365110X66003372

10.1039/df9582500193

10.1016/S0022-2836(66)80240-1

Watson J. D., 1965, Molecular Biology of the dene, 313

10.1007/BF02158433

10.1016/S0006-3495(64)86778-3

10.1107/S0365110X65000476

ball J. I., 1966, Proc. Roy. Soc, (London), 295, 320

10.1107/S0365110X65001123

10.1107/S0365110X65000749

10.1107/S0365110X65002852

10.1107/S0365110X65002864

10.1002/jps.2600561016

E.Shefter J. Pharm. Sci. in press; also private communication.

Iball J., 1965, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), 302, 225

C. E.Bugg U. T.Thewalt andR. E.Marsh paper presented at American Crystallography Association Meeting Buffalo New York Aug. 12‐16 1968 Abstracts; also private communications.

J.HuntandE.Subramanian paper presented at American Crystallography Association Meeting Tuscon Arizona Feb. 4‐7 1968 Abstracts; also private communications.

J.Konnert I. L.Karle andJ.Karle paper presented at American Crystallography Association Meeting Buffalo New York Aug. 12‐16 1968.Abstracts

10.1038/2171148a0

10.1016/S0040-4039(01)99671-6

G. W.Frank paper presented at American Crystallography Association Meeting Buffalo New York Aug. 12‐16 1968;Abstracts.

10.1016/S0022-2836(65)80154-1

10.1016/0022-2836(67)90279-3

10.1107/S0365110X61002801

10.1107/S0365110X65002530

10.1021/ja01033a031

10.1107/S0365110X63000207

10.1107/S0567740868003869

10.1021/ja00970a002

10.3891/acta.chem.scand.16-1627

10.1107/S0365110X61003363

10.1107/S0365110X66000215

10.1126/science.150.3699.1035

10.1107/S0365110X66002366

10.1107/S0365110X66002329

10.1107/S0365110X56001017

Schefter E., 1964, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 63, 37

10.1098/rspa.1962.0074

Brink‐Shoemaker C., 1964, Proc. Roy. Soc, (London), 278, 1

10.1098/rspa.1968.0039

10.1126/science.159.3817.888

10.1126/science.159.3811.206

10.1098/rspa.1954.0101

10.1016/S0022-2836(60)80005-8

10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80021-1

10.1016/S0022-2836(65)80282-0

10.1016/0022-2836(67)90057-5

10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80009-0

10.1016/S0022-2836(60)80047-2

10.1016/0022-2836(67)90026-5

10.1021/ja01081a037

10.1016/S0022-2836(65)80155-3

10.1021/ja01202a069

10.1021/ja01522a014

10.1021/ja01483a011

10.1021/ja00907a060

10.1107/S0365110X59000159

Edwards J. T., Chem. Ind, (London), 1955, 1102

R. U.LemieuxandN. J.Chii paper presented at 133rd Meeting American Chemical Society San Francisco April 1958;Abstracts p. 31 N.

10.1002/bip.1968.360060204

M.Sundaralingam unpublished results.

10.1107/S0365110X64002882

10.1107/S0365110X65004024

10.1126/science.154.3754.1331

10.1107/S0365110X57001383

10.1107/S0365110X60000583

10.1107/S0365110X58000876

10.1107/S0365110X65003468

M.Sundaralingam to be published.

Szent‐Gyorgi A., 1957, Bioenergetics, 64

10.1107/S0365110X63000979

J.CarrabineandM.Sundaralingam Chem. Comm. 746(1968).

E.Sletten Chem. Comm. 1119(1967).

10.1107/S0365110X51000337

10.1021/cr60243a002

10.1063/1.1697286

10.1021/ja00961a060

10.1016/B978-1-4832-2843-3.50018-2

M.Sundaralingam paper presented at American Crystallography Association Meeting Buffalo New York Ag. 12‐16 1968;Abstracts p. L1.

M.Sundaralingam S. T.Rao C. E.Bugg andJ.Thomas paper presented at American Crystallography Association Meeting Seattle Washington Mar. 23‐27 1969;Abstracts p. L5.