Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms

Microbiology (United Kingdom) - Tập 151 Số 3 - Trang 757-762 - 2005
Darla M. Goeres1, Linda R. Loetterle1, Martin A. Hamilton1, Ricardo Murga2, Douglas W. Kirby3, Rodney M. Donlan2
1Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-3980, USA
2Biofilm Laboratory, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
3Scientific Resources Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

Tóm tắt

Microbial biofilms have been grown in laboratories using a variety of different approaches. A laboratory biofilm reactor system, called the CDC biofilm reactor (CBR) system, has been devised for growing biofilms under moderate to high fluid shear stress. The reactor incorporates 24 removable biofilm growth surfaces (coupons) for sampling and analysing the biofilm. Following preliminary experiments to verify the utility of the CBR system for growing biofilms of several clinically relevant organisms, a standard operating procedure for growing a Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm was created. This paper presents the results of a rigorous, intra-laboratory, statistical evaluation of the repeatability and ruggedness of that procedure as well as the results of the experiments with clinically relevant organisms. For the statistical evaluations, the outcome of interest was the density (c.f.u. cm−2) of viable P. aeruginosa. Replicate experiments were conducted to assess the repeatability of the log density outcome. The mean P. aeruginosa log10 density was 7·1, independent of the coupon position within the reactor. The repeatability standard deviation of the log density based on one coupon per experiment was 0·59. Analysis of variance showed that the variability of the log density was 53 % attributable to within-experiment sources and 47 % attributable to between-experiments sources. The ruggedness evaluation applied response-surface design and regression analysis techniques, similar to those often used for sensitivity analyses in other fields of science and engineering. This approach provided a quantitative description of ruggedness; specifically, the amount the log density was altered by small adjustments to four key operational factors – time allowed for initial surface colonization, temperature, nutrient concentration, and fluid shear stress on the biofilm. The small size of the regression coefficient associated with each operational factor showed that the method was rugged; that is, relatively insensitive to minor perturbations of the four factors. These results demonstrate that the CBR system is a reliable experimental tool for growing a standard biofilm in the laboratory and that it can be adapted to study several different micro-organisms.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allison, 1999, Perfused biofilm fermenters, Methods Enzymol, 310, 232, 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)10021-1

1995, Guidelines for collaborative study procedures to validate characteristics of a method of analysis, J AOAC Int, 78, 143A

1998, AOAC Peer-verified Methods Program Manual on Policies and Procedures

2002a, E456-02: Standard terminology relating to quality and statistics, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 14.02

2002b, E1169-02: Standard guide for conducting ruggedness tests, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 14.02

Camper, 1996, Effect of growth conditions and substratum composition on the persistence of coliforms in mixed-population biofilms, Appl Environ Microbiol, 62, 4014, 10.1128/AEM.62.11.4014-4018.1996

Ceri, 1999, The Calgary Biofilm Device: a new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms, J Clin Microbiol, 37, 1771, 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1771-1776.1999

Characklis, 1990, Biofilms

Donlan, 2002, Monochloramine disinfection of biofilm-associated Legionella pneumophila in a potable water model system, Legionella, 406

Donlan, 2004, A model system for growing and quantifying Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilms in situ and in real time, Appl Environ Microbiol, 70, 4980, 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4980-4988.2004

Feldsine, 2002, AOAC International methods committee guidelines for validation of qualitative and quantitative food microbiological official methods of analysis, J AOAC Int, 85, 1187, 10.1093/jaoac/85.5.1187

Herigstad, 2001, How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria, J Microbiol Methods, 44, 121, 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00241-4

1993, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement

Kharazmi, 1999, Robbins Device in biofilm research, Methods Enzymol, 310, 207, 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)10018-1

Mittelman, 1992, Multipurpose laminar-flow adhesion cells for the study of bacterial colonization and biofilm formation, Biofouling, 6, 39, 10.1080/08927019209386208

Murga, 2001, Role of biofilms in the survival of Legionella pneumophila in a model potable-water system, Microbiology, 147, 3121, 10.1099/00221287-147-11-3121

Nickel, 1985, Antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonizing a urinary catheter in vitro, Eur J Clin Microbiol, 4, 213, 10.1007/BF02013600

2003, e-Handbook of Statistical Methods

O'Toole, 1998, Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signaling pathways: a genetic analysis, Mol Microbiol, 28, 449, 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00797.x

Stoodley, 1999, Influence of hydrodynamics and nutrients on biofilm structure, J Appl Microbiol Symp Suppl, 85, 19S, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1998.tb05279.x

Thompson, 2000, Towards a unified model of errors in analytical measurement, Analyst, 125, 2020, 10.1039/b006376m

Thompson, 2002, Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis, Pure Appl Chem, 74, 835, 10.1351/pac200274050835

Youden, 1975, Statistical Manual of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists

Zelver, 1999, Measuring antimicrobial effects on biofilm bacteria: from laboratory to field, Methods Enzymol, 310, 608, 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)10047-8