Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus

BMC Medical Ethics - Tập 19 Số 1 - 2018
Jonathan Ives1, Michael Dunn2, Bert Molewijk3, Jan Schildmann4, Kristine Bærøe5, Lucy Frith6, Richard Huxtable1, Elleke Landeweer7, Marcel Mertz8, Veerle Provoost9, Annette Rid10, Sabine Salloch11, Mark Sheehan2, Daniel Strech12, Martine C. de Vries13, Guy Widdershoven3
1University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2University Of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
4Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
5University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
6Universty of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
7University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
8Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
9Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
10Kings College London, London, UK
11Greifswald University, Greifswald, Germany
12Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
13Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ives J, Dunn M, Cribb A, editors. Empirical bioethics: theoretical and practical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University press; 2017.

Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K. The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. Bioethics. 2005;19(1):49–71.

Hurst S. What empirical turn in bioethics? Bioethics. 2012;24:429–44.

Hedgecoe A. Medical sociology and the redundancy of empirical ethics. In: Ashcroft, et al., editors. Principles of healthcare ethics: Springer; 2007. p. 167–75.

Herrera C. Is it time for bioethics to go empirical? Bioethics. 2008;22:137–46.

van Delden J, van Thiel G. Reflective equilibrium as a normative-empirical model in bioethics. In: ven der Burg W, van Willigenburg T, editors. Reflective equilibrium: Essays in honour of Robert Heeger. Dordrecht: Springer; 1998. p. 251–9.

Widdershoven G, Abma T, Molewijk B. Empirical ethics as a dialogical practice. Bioethics. 2009;23(4):236–48.

De Vries R, Turner L, Orfali K, Bosk C, editors. The view from Here: bioethics and the social sciences. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2007.

De Vries M, van Leeuwen E. Reflective equilibrium and empirical data: third person moral experiences in empirical medical ethics. Bioethics. 2010;24(4):490–8.

Dunn M, Sheehan M, Parker M, Hope T. Toward methodological innovation in empirical ethics research. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2012;21(4):466–80.

Frith L. Symbiotic bioethics: a practical methodology. Bioethics. 2010;26(4):198–206.

Haimes E, Williams R. Sociology, ethics and the priority of the particular: learning from a case study of genetic deliberations. Br J Sociol. 2007;58(3):457–76.

Ives J. A method of reflexive balancing in a pragmatic, interdisciplinary and reflexive bioethics. Bioethics. 2014;28(6):302–12.

Kim S, Wall I, Stanczyk A, De Vries R. Assessing the public’s views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009;4(4):3–16.

Leget C, Borry P, De Vries R. ‘Nobody tosses a dwarf!’ The relation between the empirical and the normative reexamined. Bioethics. 2009;23(4):226–35.

Molewijk B, Stiggelbout A, Otten W, Dupois H, Kievit J. Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics. Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7:55–69.

Molewijk B, Widdershoven G. Don’t solve the issues! A Plea for ambiguity within empirical ethics. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2012;21:448–56.

Reiter-Theil S. Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? “The embedded researcher” as a methodological approach. Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7(1):17–29.

Solomon M. Realising bioethics goals in practice: ten ways an “is” can help an “ought”. Hastings Cent Rep. 2005;35(4):40–7.

Salloch S, Schildmann J, Vollmann J. Empirical research in medical ethics: how conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice. BMC Med Ethics. 2012;13:5.

Davies R, Ives J, Dunn M. A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16:15.

Frith L, Draper H. Publishing research in empirical bioethics: quality, disciplines and expertise. In: Ives J, Dunn M, Cribb A, editors. Empirical bioethics: theoretical and practical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 235–55.

Alderson P, Farsides B, Williams C. Examining ethics in practice: health service professionals’ evaluations of in-hospital ethics seminars. Nurs Ethics. 2002;9(5):508–20.

Mertz M, Inthorn J, Renz G, Rothenberger L, Salloch S, Schildmann J, Wöhlke S, Schicktanz S. Research across the disciplines: a road map for quality criteria in empirical ethics research. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:17.

Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.

Hsu C, Sandford B. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Asses, Res Eval. 2007;12(10). ISSN (1531-7714). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=10 .

Dunn M, Ives J. Methodology, epistemology, and empirical bioethics research: a constructive/ist commentary. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6–7):93–5.

Evidence SI. Epistemology and empirical bioethics. In: Ives J, Dunn M, Cribb A, editors. Empirical Bioethics: Theoretical and Practical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 67–83.

Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S. The problem of appraising qualitative research quality and safety in health care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2004;13(3):223–5.

Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. Cabinet Office. 2003; https://www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Spencer-Quality-in-qualitative-evaluation.pdf . Accessed 4 Dec 2017.

Mertz M, Schildmann J. Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies. Med Health Care Philos. 2018;21:207-14.