Stand-Alone Lateral Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Hindawi Limited - Tập 2012 - Trang 1-7 - 2012
Luís Marchi1,2, Nitamar Abdala1, Leonardo Oliveira2, Rodrigo Amaral2, Etevaldo Coutinho2, Luiz Pimenta2,3
1Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 04024-002, Brazil
2Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Instituto de Patologia da Coluna, São Paulo, SP 04101-000, Brazil
3Department of Neurosurgery UCSD San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103, USA

Tóm tắt

The purpose of this paper was to investigate the stand-alone lateral interbody fusion as a minimally invasive option for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis with a minimum 24-month followup. Prospective nonrandomized observational single-center study. 52 consecutive patients (67.6±10 y/o; 73.1% female;27.4±3.4 BMI) with single-level grade I/II single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis without significant spine instability were included. Fusion procedures were performed as retroperitoneal lateral transpsoas interbody fusions without screw supplementation. The procedures were performed in average 73.2 minutes and with less than 50cc blood loss. VAS and Oswestry scores showed lasting improvements in clinical outcomes (60% and 54.5% change, resp.). The vertebral slippage was reduced in 90.4% of cases from mean values of 15.1% preoperatively to 7.4% at 6-week followup (P<0.001) and was maintained through 24 months (7.1%,P<0.001). Segmental lordosis (P<0.001) and disc height (P<0.001) were improved in postop evaluations. Cage subsidence occurred in 9/52 cases (17%) and 7/52 cases (13%) spine levels needed revision surgery. At the 24-month evaluation, solid fusion was observed in 86.5% of the levels treated. The minimally invasive lateral approach has been shown to be a safe and reproducible technique to treat low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1056/NEJMoa070302

10.2106/JBJS.H.00913

1955, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 37, 493, 10.2106/00004623-195537030-00005

10.1097/00007632-199702150-00019

10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180bc219e

10.1007/s00586-008-0739-1

10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012

10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022db0

2010, World Spinal Column Journal, 1, 19

10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.005

10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181a32ead

10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b31729

2011, Coluna/Columna, 10

10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09865

1990

1986, Spine, 11, 937, 10.1097/00007632-198611000-00014

1983, Spine, 8, 331, 10.1097/00007632-198304000-00018

1999, Journal of Spinal Disorders, 12, 501

1990, Spine, 15, 787, 10.1097/00007632-199008010-00010

10.1097/00007632-200304150-00016

10.1097/00007632-199701150-00016

10.1016/j.spinee.2011.01.023

10.1097/00024720-200310000-00006

10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cf7640

2005, Spine, 30, S97

10.1001/jama.268.7.907

10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00184-5

10.1097/BRS.0b013e318202308b

10.1097/00007632-200201010-00014

10.1097/00007632-200307150-00016

10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E16

2010, World Spine Column Journal, 3, 194

10.1055/s-0030-1249704

10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.001

10.1097/01.brs.0000197204.91891.eb

10.1016/j.surneu.2005.08.021

1996, Instructional Course Lectures, 45, 109

1998, Journal of Spinal Disorders, 11, 328

10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e1040a

10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181ecf995

10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182027976

10.1007/s00586-004-0817-y

10.1097/01.brs.0000250979.12398.96

10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182023796