Stance-taking as negotiating academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussion sections

Journal of English for Academic Purposes - Tập 24 - Trang 43-57 - 2016
Fei-Wen Cheng1, Len Unsworth2
1Department of Foreign Languages, National Chiayi University, Chiayi County 62142, Taiwan
2Learning Sciences Institute, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bakhtin, 1981 Basturkmen, 2009, Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in language teaching, Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 8, 241, 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.001 Basturkmen, 2012, A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 134, 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004 Bazerman, 1988 Berkenkotter, 1995 Bitchner, 2010 Bloor, 1993, How economists modify propositions, 153 Buckingham, 1997, A model of citation options, Annual Review of Australian Linguistics, 20, 51, 10.1075/aral.20.2.04buc Chang, 2011, Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 140, 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005 Dahl, 2008, Contributing to the academic conversation: A study of new knowledge claims in economics and linguistics, Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1184, 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.11.006 Dahl, 2011, Wrong or just different? How existing knowledge is staged to promote new claims in English economics and linguistics articles, 259 Giannoni, 2005, Negative evaluation in academic discourse. A comparison of English and Italian research articles, Linguistica e Filologia, 20, 71 Gil-Salom, 2014, Writers' positioning in literature reviews in English and Spanish computing doctoral theses, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 23, 10.1016/j.jeap.2014.08.002 Halliday, 1994 Hu, 2015, Disciplinary and paradigmatic influences on interactional metadiscourse in research articles, English for Specific Purposes, 39, 12, 10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.002 Hunston, 1993, Professional Conflict: Disagreement in academic discourse, 115 Hyland, 1998 Hyland, 2004 Kanoksilapatham, 2005, Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles, English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269, 10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003 Kanoksilapatham, 2015, Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora, English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74, 10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008 Kuhn, 1996 Kwan, 2012, Evaluating prior scholarship in literature reviews of research articles: A comparative study of practices in two research paradigms, English for Specific Purposes, 31, 188, 10.1016/j.esp.2012.02.003 Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 Le, 2015, Phraseology used to comment on results in the Discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles, English for Specific Purposes, 39, 45, 10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.003 Lim, 2010, Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 280, 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.10.001 Lim, 2012, How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers' rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 229, 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.002 Lim, 2015, Purpose statements in experimental doctoral dissertations submitted to U.S. universities: An inquiry into doctoral students' communicative resources in language education, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 69, 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.002 Lindeberg, 2004 Locke, 1997, Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and ‘problematizing’ in organizational studies, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1023, 10.2307/256926 Loi, 2016, Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 1, 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.004 Martín-Martín, 2004, The rhetorical management of academic criticism in research article Abstracts, Text, 24, 171, 10.1515/text.2004.007 Martin, 2005 Myers, 1989, The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles, Applied Linguistics, 10, 1, 10.1093/applin/10.1.1 Myers, 1992, ‘In this paper we report…’: Speech acts and scientific facts, Journal of pragmatics, 17, 295, 10.1016/0378-2166(92)90013-2 Nwogu, 1997, The medical research paper: Structure and functions, English for Specific Purposes, 16, 119, 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4 O'Donnell, 2012 Paltridge, 2007 Pho, 2011, Establishing a niche in applied linguistics and Educational Technology research articles, 283 Salager-Meyer, 1999, Contentiousness in written medical English discourse: A diachronic study (1810-1995), Text, 19, 371, 10.1515/text.1.1999.19.3.371 Salager-Meyer, 2001, From self-highlightedness to self-effacement: A genre based study of the socio-pragmatic function of criticism in medical discourse, LSP and Professional Communication, 1, 63 Salager-Meyer, 2011, Expert knowledge-holders, knowledge-builders and factual reporters: Critical voices in medical genres, 173 Salager-Meyer, 2003, The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930-1995), English for Specific Purposes, 22, 223, 10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00019-4 Salager-Meyer, 2011 Sawaki, 2014 Swales, 1990 Swales, 2012 Thompson, 1993, Arguing for experimental “facts” in science, Written Communication, 10, 106, 10.1177/0741088393010001004 White, 2001 Yang, 2003, Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions, English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365, 10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1