Sperm/egg interaction: The specificity of human spermatozoa

Wiley - Tập 188 Số 4 - Trang 477-487 - 1977
J. M. Bedford1
1Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Anatomy Cornell University Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021

Tóm tắt

AbstractHuman spermatozoa display unusually limited affinities in their interaction with oocytes of other species. They adhered to and, when capacitated, penetrated the vestments of the oocyte of an ape‐the gibbon, Hylobates lar‐ both in vivo and in vitro. On the other hand, human spermatozoa would not even attach to the zona surface of sub‐hominoid primate (baboon, rhesus monkey, squirrel monkey), nor to the non‐primate eutherian oocytes tested. Among the apes the gibbon stands furthest from man. Thus, although the specificity of human spermatozoa is not confined to man alone, it probably is restricted to the Hominoidea. This study also suggests that the evolution of man and perhaps the other hominids has been accompanied by a restrictive change in the nature of the sperm surface which has limited and made more specific the complementary surface to which their spermatozoa may adhere. For the failure of human spermatozoa to attach to the zona surface of all non‐hominoid oocytes stands in contrast to the behaviour of spermatozoa of the several other mammals studied which, in most combinations, adhered readily to foreign oocytes, including those of man. Taxonomically, the demonstration of a compatibility between the gametes of man and gibbon, not shared with cercopithecids, constitutes further evidence for inclusion of the Hylobatidae within the Hominoidea.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1098/rspb.1958.0065

10.1530/jrf.0.0180544

10.1530/jrf.0.0200159

10.1002/aja.1001230207

10.1002/aja.1001330206

Bedford J. M., 1974, Contributions to Primatology, 3. Reproductive Biology of the Primates, 97

10.1002/jez.1401280207

10.1007/978-3-642-48949-5_11

Chiarelli A. B., 1973, Evolution of the Primates

10.1530/jrf.0.0210267

Franklin L. E., 1970, The acrosomal region and the acrosome reaction in sperm of the golden hamster, Biol. Reprod., 3, 180, 10.1093/biolreprod/3.2.180

Groves C. P., 1972, Gibbons and Siamang, 1

10.1093/biolreprod/6.2.300

10.1530/jrf.0.0460239

10.1038/234479b0

10.1073/pnas.69.10.2767

10.1530/jrf.0.0360049

10.1095/biolreprod13.3.340

10.1530/jrf.0.0310237

10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01166.x

10.1016/0010-7824(76)90081-0

Kreider J. L., 1970, Induction of temporary infertility in rams with an orally administered chlorohydrin, J. Anim. Sci., 31, 95, 10.2527/jas1970.31195x

10.1530/jrf.0.0260387

10.1002/jez.1401960206

10.1016/0012-1606(74)90292-9

Overstreet J. W., 1976, Penetration of the zona pellucida of non‐living human oocytes by human spermatozoa in vitro, Fertil. Steril., 27, 815, 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)41959-X

Paulsen C. A., 1976, Regulatory Mechanisms of Male Reproductive Physiology, 197

Rose N. R., 1976, Techniques for detection of iso‐and autoantibodies to human spermatozoa, Clin. exp. Immunol., 23, 175

10.1016/S0010-7824(76)80055-8

Sarich V. M., 1968, Perspectives on Human Evolution, 94

Shettles L. B., 1960, Ovum Humanum; Growth, Maturation, Nourishment, Fertilization and Early Development

Whitten W. K., 1971, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors in Early Mammalian Development. Adv. Biosci., 129

10.1530/jrf.0.0280477

10.1016/S0022-5320(70)90163-2

10.1095/biolreprod15.4.471