Space invaders; biological invasions in marine conservation planning

Diversity and Distributions - Tập 22 Số 12 - Trang 1220-1231 - 2016
Sylvaine Giakoumi1,2, François Guilhaumon3, Salit Kark1, Antonio Terlizzi4, Joachim Claudet5,6, Serena Felline7, Carlo Cerrano8, Marta Coll9,10,3, Roberto Danovaro8, Simonetta Fraschetti7, Drosos Koutsoubas11, Jean‐Baptiste Ledoux12,13, Tessa Mazor14, Bastien Mérigot3, Fiorenza Micheli15, Stelios Katsanevakis16
1ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
2Faculté de Sciences, EA 4228 ECOMERS
3MARine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation
4Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn
5Centre de recherches insulaires et observatoire de l'environnement
6Laboratoire d’Excellence CORAIL
7Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche e Ambientali
8Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente
9Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
10LMI ICEMASA
11National Marine Park of Zakynthos
12Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental (Universidade do Porto)
13Institute of Marine Sciences / Institut de Ciències del Mar [Barcelona]
14CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
15Hopkins Marine Station [Stanford]
16Department of Marine Sciences [Aegean]

Tóm tắt

AbstractAimBiological invasions are major contributors to global change and native biodiversity decline. However, they are overlooked in marine conservation plans. Here, we examine for the first time the extent to which marine conservation planning research has addressed (or ignored) biological invasions. Furthermore, we explore the change of spatial priorities in conservation plans when different approaches are used to incorporate the presence and impacts of invasive species.LocationGlobal analysis with a focus on the Mediterranean Sea region.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review consisting of three steps: (1) article selection using a search engine, (2) abstract screening and (3) review of pertinent articles, which were identified in the second step. The information extracted included the scale and geographical location of each case study as well as the approach followed regarding invasive species. We also applied the softwareMarxanto produce and compare conservation plans for the Mediterranean Sea that either protect, or avoid areas impacted by invasives, or ignore the issue. One case study focused on the protection of critical habitats, and the other on endemic fish species.ResultsWe found that of 119 papers on marine spatial plans in specific biogeographic regions, only three (2.5%) explicitly took into account invasive species. When comparing the different conservation plans for each case study, we found that the majority of selected sites for protection (ca. 80%) changed in the critical habitat case study, while this proportion was lower but substantial (27%) in the endemic fish species case study.Main conclusionsBiological invasions are being widely disregarded when planning for conservation in the marine environment across local to global scales. More explicit consideration of biological invasions can significantly alter spatial conservation priorities. Future conservation plans should explicitly account for biological invasions to optimize the selection of marine protected areas.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abdul Malak D., 2011, Overview of the Conservation Status of the Marine Fishes of the Mediterranean Sea

10.1007/s10530-012-0266-1

10.1007/s10530-004-3123-z

10.3923/jfas.2010.510.516

Ball I.R., 2009, Spatial Conservation Prioritisation: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools, 185, 10.1093/oso/9780199547760.003.0014

10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00071.x

10.1016/S0308-597X(03)00041-1

10.1890/12-2150.1

Boudouresque C.F., 2005, Nature conservation, marine protected areas, sustainable development and the flow of invasive species to the Mediterranean Sea, Travaux Scientifiques du Parc National de Port‐Cros, 21, 29

10.1890/130296

10.3354/meps09137

10.1007/s10530-012-0265-2

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00697.x

Convention on Biological Diversity(2015)Aichi biodiversity targets. Available at:https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/(accessed 6 November 2015).

10.1111/ddi.12002

10.1111/ddi.12235

10.1093/biosci/biv082

ETC/BD (European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity)(2010)http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/activities/Natura_2000/pdfs/Additional_marine_guidelines.pdf(accessed 14 May 2013).

EU(2008)Directive of the European Parliament and the Council Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Marine Environmental Policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) European Commission Directive 2008/56/EC OJ L 164.

10.1007/s10530-014-0778-y

10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.006

10.1371/journal.pone.0076449

10.1016/j.marpol.2015.07.004

10.1890/13-0979.1

10.1111/ddi.12280

10.1111/ddi.12258

10.1073/pnas.0901001106

10.3391/ai.2014.9.4.01

10.3391/mbi.2015.6.2.05

10.1111/ddi.12429

10.1111/conl.12005

10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.030

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01398.x

10.1890/13-1249.1

10.1046/j.1472-4642.2002.00153.x

10.1371/journal.pone.0079889

10.1371/journal.pone.0059038

Moilanen A., 2009, Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools, 196, 10.1093/oso/9780199547760.003.0015

10.1007/s10530-014-0835-6

10.1890/070064

10.1371/journal.pone.0021510

10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01914-5

10.1111/maec.12277

Pressey R.L., 2009, Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools, 211, 10.1093/oso/9780199547760.003.0016

10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01646.x

10.1111/ele.12111

10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013

10.1641/B570707

10.1007/s10530-005-6422-0

10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.007

10.12681/mms.180

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00861.x

10.1023/B:BINV.0000034598.28718.2e

10.1098/rspb.2014.0846

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x

10.1093/jpe/rtp007

10.12681/mms.327

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Diversity and Distributions

Tập 22 Số 12

1220-1231

Thông tin tác giả