Sourcing from Suppliers with Financial Constraints and Performance Risk

Manufacturing and Service Operations Management - Tập 20 Số 1 - Trang 70-84 - 2018
Christopher S. Tang1, S. Alex Yang2, Jing Wu3
1Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90077
2London Business School, London, NW1 4SA, United Kingdom
3College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Tóm tắt

Two innovative financing schemes have emerged in recent years to enable suppliers to obtain financing for production. The first, purchase order financing (POF), allows financial institutions to offer loans to suppliers by considering the value of purchase orders issued by reputable buyers. Under the second, which we call buyer direct financing (BDF), manufacturers issue both sourcing contracts and loans directly to suppliers. Both schemes are closely related to the supplier’s performance risk (whether the supplier can deliver the order successfully), upon which the repayment of these loans hinges. To understand the relative efficiency of the two emerging schemes, we analyze a game-theoretical model that captures the interactions among three parties (a manufacturer, a financially constrained supplier who can exert unobservable effort to improve delivery reliability, and a bank). We find that, when the manufacturer and the bank have symmetric information, POF and BDF yield the same payoffs for all parties irrespective of the manufacturer’s control advantage under BDF. The manufacturer, however, has more flexibility under BDF in selecting contract terms. In addition, even when the manufacturer has superior information about the supplier’s operational capability, the manufacturer can efficiently signal her private information via the sourcing contract if the supplier’s asset level is not too low. As such, POF remains an attractive financing option. However, if the supplier is severely financially constrained, the manufacturer’s information advantage makes BDF the preferred financing scheme when contracting with an efficient supplier. In particular, the relative benefit of BDF (over POF) is more pronounced when the supply market contains a larger proportion of inefficient suppliers, when differences in efficiency between suppliers are greater, or when the manufacturer’s alternative sourcing option is more expensive.

The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2017.0638 .

This paper has been accepted for the Manufacturing & Service Operations Management Special Issue on Interface of Finance, Operations, and Risk Management.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/9781118115800.ch14

10.1287/msom.1090.0284

10.1287/msom.1110.0366

10.1287/mnsc.2014.2029

Bolton P, 2005, Contract Theory

10.1287/mnsc.1040.0278

10.1287/mnsc.47.5.629.10486

Chen Y, Gupta D (2014) Trade-finance contracts for small-business suppliers and the effect of third-party financing. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

10.2307/1885060

10.1287/mnsc.2016.2515

Chod J, Trichakis N, Tsoukalas G (2016) A signaling theory of in-kind finance. Working paper, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.

10.1287/mnsc.1120.1524

Dong L, Tang SY, Tomlin B (2015) Production chain disruptions: Inventory, preparedness, and insurance. Working paper, Washington University, St. Louis.

Fung VK, 2007, Competing in a Flat World: Building Enterprises for a Borderless World

Gustin D, 2014, Trade Financing Matters

Hwang W, Bakshi N, DeMiguel V (2014) Simple contracts for reliable supply: Capacity versus yield uncertainty. Working paper, London Business School, London.

10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.001

10.1287/opre.1120.1040

10.1002/9781118115800

10.2307/j.ctv7h0rwr

10.1287/msom.2016.0600

10.1287/mnsc.1100.1275

10.1111/1468-2354.00082

10.1287/mnsc.1120.1649

Martin A, 2010, New York Times

10.2307/2555714

Modigliani F, 1958, Amer. Econom. Rev., 48, 261

10.1287/msom.2016.0608

10.1287/mnsc.31.8.998

10.1257/jel.39.2.432

10.1111/poms.12313

10.1016/0022-0531(83)90120-5

10.1111/poms.12245

10.1007/978-1-4614-3238-8

10.1257/00028280260136200

10.1287/msom.1070.0199

10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006

10.1111/poms.12160

Tice C, 2010, Entrepreneur

10.1002/9781118115800.ch4

10.1287/mnsc.2017.2863

Watkins S, 2012, Daily Mail

10.1287/mnsc.2017.2799