Some problems encountered in reviewing clinical microbiology manuscripts

Anon., 1982 Bailar, 1985, Journal peer review — the need for a research agenda, New Engl. J. Med., 312, 654, 10.1056/NEJM198503073121023 Beaver, 1982, On the failure to detect previously published research, Behav. Brain Sci., 5, 199, 10.1017/S0140525X00011225 Day, 1983 de Lacey, 1985, How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals?, Brit. Med. J., 291, 884, 10.1136/bmj.291.6499.884 Fulginiti, 1984, On the editorial process in the medical literature, Amer. J. Dis. Child., 138, 337 Fulginiti, 1985, Unfortunately, more on duplicate publication, Amer. J. Dis. Child., 139, 865 Garfield, 1986, Refereeing and peer review. Part 1: Opinion and conjecture on the effectiveness of refereeing. Part 2: The research on refereeing and alternatives to the present system, Curr. Cont., 31, 3 Garfield, 1986, Refereeing and peer review. Part 1: Opinion and conjecture on the effectiveness of refereeing. Part 2: The research on refereeing and alternatives to the present system, Curr. Cont., 32, 3 Huth, 1982, 178 Huth, 1986, Guidelines on authorship of medical papers, Ann. Intern. Med., 104, 269, 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-269 Ilstrup, 1978, Statistical methods employed in the study of blood culture media, 31 Sherris, 1981, Evaluation of automated and rapid methods, 1 Vaisrub, 1985, Manuscript review from a statistician's perspective, J. Amer. med. Ass., 253, 3145, 10.1001/jama.253.21.3145