Solving Rate of Change Tasks with a Graphing Calculator: a Case Study on Instrumental Genesis

Gerrit Roorda1, Pauline Vos2, Paul Drijvers3, Martin Goedhart4
1Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Teacher Education, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, The Netherlands
2Department of Mathematics, University of Agder, Gimlemoen 25, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway
3Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584, CC, Utrecht, the Netherlands
4Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 9, 9747 AG, Groningen, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

An, H., Alon, S., & Fuentes, D. (2014). Tablets in K–12 education: Integrated experiences and implications. Hershey: IGI-Global.

Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245–274.

Berry, J., & Graham, T. (2005). On high-school students’ use of graphic calculators in mathematics. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 37(3), 140–148.

Burrill, G., Allison, J., Breaux, G., Kastberg, S., Leatham, K., & Sanchez, W. (Eds.). (2002). Handheld graphing technology in secondary mathematics: Research findings and implications for classroom practice. Dallas: Texas Instruments.

Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K–12 classrooms: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113.

Delos Santos, A. (2006). An investigation of students’ understanding and representation of derivative in a graphic calculator-mediated teaching and learning environment. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Auckland, NZ: The University of Auckland.

Doerr, H., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 143–163.

Drijvers, P., & Barzel, B. (2012). Equations with technology: different tools, different views. Mathematics Teaching, 228, 14–19.

Drijvers, P., & Doorman, M. (1996). The graphics calculator in mathematics education. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 425–440.

Drijvers, P., Godino, J., Font, V., & Trouche, L. (2013). One episode, two lenses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 23–49.

Dunn, P., Richardson, A., Oprescu, F., & McDonald, C. (2013). Mobile-phone-based classroom response systems: students’ perceptions of engagement and learning in a large undergraduate course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(8), 1160–1174.

Ellington, A. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students’ achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5), 433–463.

Goldin, G. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517–545). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1998). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: the case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3(3), 195–227.

Hähkiöniemi, M. (2006). Associative and reflective connections between the limit of the difference quotient and limiting process. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(2), 170–184.

Heid, K. (1997). The technological revolution and the reform of school mathematics. American Journal of Education, 106(1), 5–61.

Kendal, M., & Stacey, K. (2003). Tracing learning of three representations with the differentiation competency framework. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 22–41.

Koichu, B., & Harel, G. (2007). Triadic interaction in clinical task-based interviews with mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(3), 349–365.

Leng, N. (2011). Using an advanced graphing calculator in the teaching and learning of calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 925–938.

Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (2000). The only generalisation is: There is no generalisation. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Eds.), Case study method: Key issues, key texts (pp. 27–44). London: Sage Publications.

McCulloch, A. (2011). Affect and graphing calculator use. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(2), 166–179.

Middelink, J. W., Engelhard, F. J., Brunt, J. G., Hillege, A. G. M., De Jong, R. W., Moors, J. H., & Ottink, H. A. M. (1998). Systematische natuurkunde N1 VWO 1. Baarn: NijghVersluys.

Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of differentiation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(3), 235–250.

Park, J. (2013). Is the derivative a function? If so, how do students talk about it? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(5), 624–640.

Roorda, G. (2012). Ontwikkeling in verandering: Ontwikkeling van wiskundige bekwaamheid van leerlingen met betrekking tot het concept afgeleide. (Development of ‘change’: The development of students’ mathematical proficiency with respect to the concept of derivative.) Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Groningen, NL: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Roorda, G., Vos, P., & Goedhart, M. (2007). The concept of derivative in modelling and applications. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (Proceedings of ICTMA 12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 288–293). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.

Roorda, G., Vos, P., & Goedhart, M. (2015). An actor-oriented transfer perspective on high school students’ development of the use of procedures to solve problems on rate of change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 863–889.

Stake, R. (2000). The case study method in social inquiry. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Eds.), Case study method: Key issues, key texts (pp. 20–26). London: Sage Publications.

Thurston, W. (1995). On proof and progress in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(1), 29–37.

Trouche, L. (2004). Managing complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281–307.

Trouche, L., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Handheld technology for mathematics education: flashback into the future. ZDM – The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 42(7), 667–681.

Vergnaud, G. (2009). The theory of conceptual fields. Human Development, 52(2), 83–94.

Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Zandieh, M. (1997). The evolution of student understanding of the concept of derivative. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Corvallis: Oregon State University.

Zandieh, M. (2000). A theoretical framework for analyzing student understanding of the concept of derivative. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education IV (pp. 103–127). Providence: American Mathematical Society.