Social entrepreneurship

Emerald - Tập 14 Số 3 - Trang 418-434 - 2007
Eleanor Shaw1, Sara Carter2
1Marketing
2Hunter Centre For Entrepreneurship

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to address the emerging practice of social entrepreneurship by exploring the historical and theoretical antecedents of social enterprise and its contemporary practice. By exploring key theoretical concepts, the paper draws comparisons between “for‐profit” and social entrepreneurs. The paper seeks to discuss the contemporary practice of social entrepreneurship. Discussion of the theory of entrepreneurship and contemporary practice of social entrepreneurs seeks to create a more nuanced view of social entrepreneurship and develop greater theoretical insights into this phenomenon and its recent expansion.Design/methodology/approachA phenomenological research approach was adopted, and 80 in‐depth interviews with social entrepreneurs from across the UK identified as the most appropriate data collection tool. Data analysis sought to identify and understand similarities between the more understood and studied behaviour of “profit‐seeking” entrepreneurs and those of an emerging group of social entrepreneurs.FindingsIn‐depth interviews revealed five key themes within which the practice of social entrepreneurship could be compared and contrasted with for‐profit entrepreneurship. These included: the entrepreneurial process, in particular, opportunity recognition; network embeddedness; the nature of financial risk and profit; the role of individual versus collective action in managing and structuring enterprises; and creativity and innovation.Practical implicationsFindings suggest that while the contemporary practices of social enterprises share many similarities with their for‐profit counterparts, significant differences can be found when comparing these practices with extant entrepreneurship research.Originality/valueThe paper addresses an emerging phenomenon within the practice and theory of entrepreneurship and offers insight into similarities and differences between entrepreneurship in the profit and not‐for‐profit sectors.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aldrich, H. and Zimmer, C. (1986), “Entrepreneurship through social networks”, in Sexton, D.L. and Wilson, R.W. (Eds), The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, Babson College, Babson Park, MA, pp. 154‐67.

Ashoka (2001), Ashoka, available at: www.ashoka.org.

Birley, S., Cromie, S. and Myers, A. (1990), “Entrepreneurial networks: their emergence in Ireland and overseas”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 9 No. 4.

Blair, T. (1997), first policy speech as Prime Minister, London.

Bjerke, B. and Hultman, C.E. (2002), Entrepreneurial Marketing: the Growth of Small Firms in the New Economic Era, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Brockhaus, R.H. (1982), “The psychology of the entrepreneur”, in Kent, C.A., Sexton, D.L. and Vesper, K.H. (Eds), Encyclopaedia of Entrepreneurship, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood‐Cliffs, NJ.

Bygrave, W. (1989), “The entrepreneurship paradigm (I): a philosophical look at its research methodologies”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 7‐26.

Carland, J.W., Hoy, F. and Carland, J.A.C. (1988), “‘Who is an entrepreneur?’ Is a question worth asking”, American Journal of Small Business, Winter.

Carson, D., Cromie, S., McGowan, P. and Hill, J. (1995), Marketing and Entrepreneurship in SMEs: An Innovative Approach, Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Carter, S. (2001), “Multiple business ownership in the farm sector: differentiating monoactive, diversified and portfolio enterprises”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Behaviour and Research, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 43‐59.

Chell, E., Hawthorne, J. and Brearley, S. (1991), The Entrepreneurial Personality: Concepts. Cases and Categories, Routledge, London.

Community Action Network (2001), Information Leaflet, Community Action Network, London.

Covin, J. and Slevin, D. (1991), “A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behaviour”, Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, Fall, pp. 7‐25.

Curran, J. and Blackburn, R.A. (1994), Small Firms and Local Economic Networks: The Death of the Local Economy?, Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd, London.

Curran, J., Jarvis, R., Blackburn, R.A. and Black, S. (1993), “Networks and small firms: constructs, methodological strategies and some findings”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 13‐25.

Drucker, P. (1999), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Butterworth‐Heinemann, Oxford.

Dunkelberg, W.C. and Cooper, A.C. (1982), “Entrepreneurial typologies: an empirical study”, in Vesper, K.H. (Ed.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurial Research, Babson Conference for Entrepreneurial Studies, Wellesley, MA, pp. 1‐15.

Easterby‐Smith, M., Thorpe, P. and Lowe, A. (1991), Management Research – An Introduction, Sage Publications, London.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 532‐50.

Gartner, W.B. and Starr, J.A. (1993), “The nature of entrepreneurial work”, in Birley, S. and MacMillan, I.C. (Eds), Entrepreneurship Research: Global Perspective, Elsevier Science Publications.

Gartner, W.B., Mitchell, T.R. and Vesper, K.H. (1989), “A taxonomy of new business ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 4, pp. 169‐86.

Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Aldine, Chicago, IL.

Granovetter, M.S. (1985), “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, November, pp. 55‐81.

Hill, J. and McGowan, P. (1997), “Marketing development through networking: a competency based approach for small firm entrepreneurs”, in Hills, G.E., Giglierano, J.J. and Hultman, C.M. (Eds), Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, pp. 543‐60.

Hills, G.E. and Singh, R.P. (1998), “Opportunity recognition: a survey of high performing and representative entrepreneurs”, in Hills, G.E., Giglierano, J.J. and Hultman, C.M. (Eds), Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, pp. 249‐68.

Johannisson, B. (1986), “New venture creation: a network approach”, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Wellesley, MA, pp. 236‐40.

Kilby, P. (1971), “Hunting the Heffalump”, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, The Free Press, New York, NY, pp. 27‐35.

Kirzner, I.M. (1979), Perception, Opportunity, and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Leadbeater, C. (1997), The Rise of the Social Entrepreneur, Demos, London.

Leadbeater, C. and Goss, S. (1998), Civic Entrepreneurship, Demos, London.

Lofland, J. (1971), Analysing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, Wordsworth, Belmont, CA.

McClelland, D.C. (1961), The Achieving Society, Van Nostrand Co., New York, NY.

Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (1995), Designing Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Mulgan, G. and Landry, L. (1995), The Other Invisible Hand: Remaking Charity for the 21st Century, Demos/Comedia, London.

Omura, G.S., Calantone, R.J. and Schmidt, J.B. (1993), “Entrepreneurism as a market satisfying mechanism in a free market system”, in Hills, G.E. and Mohan‐Neill, S.T. (Eds), Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, pp. 161‐71.

Prabhu, G.N. (1999), “Social entrepreneurship leadership”, Career Development International, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 140‐5.

Scase, R. and Goffee, R. (1980), The Real World of the Small Business Owner, Croom Helm, London.

Scase, R. and Goffee, R. (1982), The Entrepreneurial Middle Class, Croom Helm, London.

Schwartz, R.G. and Teach, R.D. (2000), “A model of opportunity recognition and exploitation: an empirical study of incubator firms”, Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 93‐107.

Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (1998), Scotland's Social Economy, SCVO, Edinburgh.

Social Enterprise London (2001a), Social Enterprise London Introducing Social Enterprises, SEL, London.

Social Enterprise London (2001b), Understanding Social Enterprise, SEL, London.

Smallbone, D., Evans, M., Ekanem, I. and Butters, S. (2001), Researching Social Enterprise: Final Report to the Small Business Service Centre, Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, London.

Shaw, E. (1998), “Social networks: their impact on the innovative behaviour of small service firms”, International Journal of Innovation Management, Special Issue, pp. 201‐22.

Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

Thake, S. and Zadek, S. (1997), Practical People, Noble Causes, New Economics Foundation, London.

Thompson, J., Alvy, G. and Lees, A. (2000), “Social entrepreneurship – a new look at the people and the potential”, Management Decision, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 328‐38.

Vesper, K.H. (1990), New Venture Strategies, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Watson, J. (2002), “Comparing the performance of male and female controlled businesses: relating outputs to inputs”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 91‐100.

Watson, J. and Robinson, S. (2003), “Adjusting for risk in comparing the performances of male and female controlled SMEs”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 773‐88.

Westhead, P. and Wright, M. (1999), “Contributions of novice, portfolio and serial founders located in rural and urban areas”, Regional Studies, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 157‐73.

Wynarczyk, P., Watson, R., Storey, D.J., Short, H. and Keasey, K. (1993), The Managerial Labour Market in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, Routledge, London.

Charities Commission for England and Wales (2001), Charities Commission for England and Wales, Liverpool.

Financial Times/New Economics Foundation (2001), Inner City 100 Index, Financial Times/New Economics Foundation.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 14 Số 3

418-434

Thông tin tác giả