Social connections between media and firm executives and the properties of media reporting
Tóm tắt
We study how social connections between top executives of media and listed firms affect the properties of media reporting. We find that socially connected media are significantly more likely to cover a firm than their unconnected counterparts. Their reporting is significantly more optimistically toned and contains significantly less information, and both of these effects are significantly mitigated when the firm has better information environment as represented by greater analyst coverage and larger firm size. Additional analyses show that characteristics of the underlying news, firm, or media also affect the effects of social connections on media reporting properties. Collectively, our evidence suggests the impairment of media independence when media and firms have social connections and the importance of alternative information sources in mitigating this effect.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ahern, K. R., & Sosyura, D. (2015). Rumor has it: Sensationalism in financial media. Review of Financial Studies, 28(7), 2050–2093.
Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57–116.
Bushee, B. J., Core, J. E., Guay, W., & Hamm, S. J. (2010). The role of the business press as an information intermediary. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(1), 1–19.
Bushee, B. J., & Miller, G. S. (2012). Investor relations, firm visibility, and investor following. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 867–897.
Blankespoor, E., deHaan, E., & Zhu, C. (2018). Capital market effects of media synthesis and dissemination: Evidence from robo-journalism. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(1), 1–36.
Bruynseels, L., & Cardinaels, E. (2014). Audit committees: Management watchdog or personal friend of the CEO? The Accounting Review, 89(1), 113–145.
Call, A. C., Emett, S. A., Maksymov, E., & Sharp, N. Y. (2020). Meet the press: Survey evidence on financial journalists as information intermediaries. In Working paper. Arizona State University and Texas: A&M University.
Chen, S., & Matsumoto, D. A. (2006). Favorable versus unfavorable recommendations: The impact on analyst access to management-provided information. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(4), 657–689.
Cheng, Q., Du, F., Wang, B. Y., & Wang, X. (2019). Do corporate site visits impact stock prices? Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 359–388.
Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2008). The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. Journal of Political Economy, 116(5), 951–979.
Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2010). Sell-side school ties. Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1409–1437.
Cready, W. M., & Hurtt, D. N. (2002). Assessing investor response to information events using return and volume metrics. The Accounting Review, 77(4), 891–909.
Dai, L., Parwada, J. T., & Zhang, B. (2015). The governance effect of the media’s news dissemination role: Evidence from insider trading. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 331–366.
Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2213–2253.
Engelberg, J. E., & Parsons, C. A. (2011). The causal impact of media in financial markets. Journal of Finance, 66(1), 67–97.
Engelberg, J., Gao, P., & Parsons, C. A. (2012). Friends with money. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 169–188.
Fang, L. H., & Huang, S. (2017). Gender and connections among wall street analysts. Review of Financial Studies, 30(9), 3305–3335.
Fischer, P. E., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). Reporting bias. The Accounting Review, 75(2), 229–245.
Fracassi, C., & Tate, G. A. (2012). External networking and internal firm governance. Journal of Finance, 67(1), 153–194.
Frankel, R., Mcvay, S., & Soliman, M. (2011). Non-GAAP earnings and board independence. Review of Accounting Studies, 16(4), 719–744.
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Media bias and reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 114(2), 280–316.
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from US daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), 35–71.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Gu, Z., Li, G., Li, Z., & Yang, Y. G. (2019). Friends in need are friends indeed: The effects of social ties between financial analysts and mutual fund managers. The Accounting Review, 94(1), 153–181.
Guan, Y., Su, L. N., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2016). Do school ties between auditors and client executives influence audit outcomes? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(2–3), 506–525.
Gurun, U. G., & Butler, A. W. (2012). Don’t believe the hype: Local media slant, local advertising, and firm value. Journal of Finance, 67(2), 561–598.
Gurun, U. G. (2016). Benefits of publicity. In Working paper. Texas at Dallas: University of.
He, X., Pittman, J. A., Rui, O. M., & Wu, D. (2017). Do social ties between external auditors and audit committee members affect audit quality? The Accounting Review, 92(5), 61–87.
Hope, O. K., Li, Y., Liu, Q., & Wu, H. (2020). Newspaper censorship in China: Evidence from tunneling scandals. Management Science, forthcoming.
Karolyi, S. A. (2018). Personal lending relationships. Journal of Finance, 73(1), 5–49.
Lee, L. F., Hutton, A. P., & Shu, S. (2015). The role of social media in the capital market: Evidence from consumer product recalls. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 367–404.
Li, R. (2013). Media corruption: A Chinese characteristic. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 297–310.
Li, Z., Wong, T. J., & Yu, G. (2020). Information dissemination through embedded financial analysts: Evidence from China. The Accounting Review, 95(2), 257–281.
Lu, H., Shin, J., & Zhang, M. (2019). Financial reporting and disclosure practices in China. In Working paper. University of Toronto.
Massa, M., & Simonov, A. (2011). Is college a focal point of investor life? Review of Finance, 15(4), 757–797.
McPherson, M., Smithlovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.
Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.
Piotroski, J. D., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2017). Political bias in corporate news: The role of conglomeration reform in China. Journal of Law and Economics, 60(1), 173–207.
Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y. (2018). Media bias in China. American Economic Review, 108(9), 2442–2476.
Reuter, J., & Zitzewitz, E. (2006). Do ads influence editors? Advertising and bias in the financial media. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 197–227.
Solomon, D. H. (2012). Selective publicity and stock prices. Journal of Finance, 67(2), 599–638.
Solomon, D. H., & Soltes, E. F. (2015). What are we meeting for? The consequences of private meetings with investors. Journal of Law and Economics, 58(2), 325–355.
Tetlock, P. C., Saar-Tsechansky, M., & Macskassy, S. (2008). More than words: Quantifying language to measure firm’ fundamentals. Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1437–1467.
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.
You, J., Zhang, B., & Zhang, L. (2018). Who captures the power of the pen? Review of Financial Studies, 31(1), 43–96.