Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence

Adams FC (2008) Long-term astrophysical processes. In: Bostrom N, Ćirković MM (eds) Global catastrophic risks. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 33–47

Allen C, Varner G, Zinser J (2000) Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 12:251–261

Allen C, Smit I, Wallach W (2005) Artificial morality: top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics Inf Technol 7(3):149–155

Anomaly J (2015) What’s wrong with factory farming? Public Health Ethics 8(3):246–254

Arrhenius G (2005) The boundary problem in democratic theory. In: Tersman F (ed) Democracy unbound: basic explorations I. Filosofiska Institutionen, Stockholm, pp 14–29

Arrhenius G (2011) The impossibility of a satisfactory population ethics. In: Dzhafarov E, Lacey P (eds) Descriptive and normative approaches to human behavior. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 1–26

Arrhenius G, Rabinowicz W (2015) The value of existence. In: Hirose I, Olson J (eds) The Oxford handbook of value theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 424–443

Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York

Balliet D, Wu J, De Dreu CKW (2014) Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 140(6):1556–1581

Baron RS (2005) So right it’s wrong: groupthink and the ubiquitous nature of polarized group decision making. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 37:219–253

Baum SD (2008) Better to exist: a reply to Benatar. J Med Ethics 34(12):875–876

Baum SD (2009) Description, prescription and the choice of discount rates. Ecol Econ 69(1):197–205

Benatar D (2006) Better never to have been: the harm of coming into existence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Bohannon J (2015) Fears of an AI pioneer. Science 349(6245):252

Borenstein J, Arkin R (2016) Robotic nudges: the ethics of engineering a more socially just human being. Sci Eng Ethics 22(1):31–46

Bostrom N (2008) Why I want to be a posthuman when I grow up. In: Gordijn B, Chadwick R (eds) Medical enhancement and posthumanity. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–136

Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Brandt F, Conitzer V, Endriss U, Lang J, Procaccia AD (2015) Handbook of computational social choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Buchanan A (2009) Moral status and human enhancement. Philos Public Aff 37(4):346–381

Clark J (2016) Artificial intelligence has a ‘sea of dudes’ problem. Bloomberg, New York

Cockell CS (2007) Originism: ethics and extraterrestrial life. J Br Interplanet Soc 60:147–153

de Condorcet M (1785) Essai sur l’Application de l’Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix. L’imprimerie Royale, Paris

Fossat P, Bacqué-Cazenave J, De Deurwaerdère P, Delbecque JP, Cattaert D (2014) Anxiety-like behavior in crayfish is controlled by serotonin. Science 344(6189):1293–1297

Foucault M (1961) Folie et Déraison: Histoire de la Folie à l’âge Classique. Plon, Paris

Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J Econ Lit 40(2):351–401

Funk C, Kennedy B, Podrebarac Sciupac E (2016) U.S. public wary of biomedical technologies to ‘enhance’ human abilities. Pew Research Center

Gibbs S (2016) Microsoft’s racist chatbot returns with drug-smoking Twitter meltdown. The Guardian

Ginges J, Atran S, Medin D, Shikaki K (2007) Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(18):7357–7360

Goertzel B (2016) Infusing advanced AGIs with human-like value systems: two theses. J Evol Technol 26(1):50–72

Hannon B (1998) How might nature value man? Ecol Econ 25:265–279

Harsanyi JC (1996) Utilities, preferences, and substantive goods. Soc Choice Welf 14(1):129–145

Holbrook D (1997) The consequentialistic side of environmental ethics. Environ Values 6:87–96

Hubbard FP (2011) ‘Do androids dream?’: Personhood and intelligent artifacts. Temple Law Rev 83:405–441

Klein A (2016) Robot ranchers monitor animals on giant Australian farms. New Scientist

Lin P (2016) Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomous driving: technical, legal and social aspects. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–85

Marglin SA (1963) The social rate of discount and the optimal rate of investment. Q J Econ 77(1):95–111

Martin D (2017) Who should decide how machines make morally laden decisions? Sci Eng Ethics 23(4):951–967

Mersky AC, Samaras C (2016) Fuel economy testing of autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 65:31–48

Metz R (2014) Startup Knightscope is preparing to roll out human-size robot patrols. MIT Technol Rev

Muehlhauser L, Helm L (2012) Intelligence explosion and machine ethics. In: Eden A, Søraker J, Moor JH, Steinhart E (eds) Singularity hypotheses: a scientific and philosophical assessment. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–126

Ng YK (1990) Welfarism and utilitarianism: a rehabilitation. Utilitas 2(2):171–193

Ng YK (1999) Utility, informed preference, or happiness: following Harsanyi’s argument to its logical conclusion. Soc Choice Welf 16(2):197–216

O’Malley-James JT, Cockell CS, Greaves JS, Raven JA (2014) Swansong biospheres II: the final signs of life on terrestrial planets near the end of their habitable lifetimes. Int J Astrobiol 13:229–243

Openshaw S (1983) The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Books, Norwich

Pew Research Center (2017) Changing attitudes on gay marriage

Picard R (1997) Affective computing. MIT Press, Cambridge

Ritov I, Baron J (1999) Protected values and omission bias. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 79(2):79–94

Rolston H III (1986) The preservation of natural value in the solar system. In: Hargrove EC (ed) Beyond spaceship Earth: environmental ethics and the solar system. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, pp 140–182

Rose JD, Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Diggles BK, Sawynok W, Stevens ED, Wynne CDL (2014) Can fish really feel pain? Fish Fish 15(1):97–133

Schienke EW, Tuana N, Brown DA, Davis KJ, Keller K, Shortle JS, Stickler M, Baum SD (2009) The role of the NSF Broader Impacts Criterion in enhancing research ethics pedagogy. Soc Epistemol 23(3–4):317–336

Schienke EW, Baum SD, Tuana N, Davis KJ, Keller K (2011) Intrinsic ethics regarding integrated assessment models for climate management. Sci Eng Ethics 17(3):503–523

Stone C (1972) Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. South Calif Law Rev 45:450–501

Stone J, Fernandez NC (2008) To practice what we preach: the use of hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance to motivate behavior change. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2(2):1024–1051

Sunstein CR (2000) Standing for animals. UCLA Law Rev 47(5):1333–1368

Tarleton N (2010) Coherent extrapolated volition: a meta-level approach to machine ethics. The Singularity Institute, Berkeley, CA

Thaler R, Sunstein C (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven

Tonn B (1996) A design for future-oriented government. Futures 28(5):413–431

Wallach W, Allen C (2008) Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Wallach W, Allen C, Smit I (2008) Machine morality: bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties. AI & Soc 22(4):565–582

Yampolskiy RV (2013) Artificial intelligence safety engineering: why machine ethics is a wrong approach. In: Müller VC (ed) Philosophy and theory of artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 389–396

Yazawa M (2016) Contested conventions: the struggle to establish the constitution and save the union, 1787–1789. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

Yudkowsky E (2004) Coherent extrapolated volition. The Singularity Institute, San Francisco