Robot xã hội trong liệu pháp và chăm sóc

Current Robotics Reports - Tập 1 - Trang 59-74 - 2020
Carlos A. Cifuentes1, Maria J. Pinto1, Nathalia Céspedes1, Marcela Múnera1
1Colombian School of Engineering Julio Garavito, Bogotá, Colombia

Tóm tắt

Bài viết này trình bày cái nhìn tổng quan về robot xã hội trong liệu pháp và chăm sóc sức khỏe cho trẻ em, người lớn và người cao tuổi. Theo các bằng chứng gần đây trong lĩnh vực này, các kết quả chính và những hạn chế đã được làm nổi bật. Bài tổng quan này chỉ ra những hàm ý và yêu cầu để triển khai đúng cách robot xã hội trong các tình huống liệu pháp và chăm sóc sức khỏe. Robot xã hội là một xu hướng hiện tại đang được nghiên cứu ở nhiều dịch vụ chăm sóc sức khỏe khác nhau. Bằng chứng nhấn mạnh tiềm năng và kết quả thuận lợi nhờ sự hỗ trợ và trợ giúp mà robot xã hội mang lại. Tuy nhiên, một số tác dụng phụ và hạn chế vẫn đang được nghiên cứu. Robot xã hội có thể đóng nhiều vai trò khác nhau trong lĩnh vực sức khỏe và phúc lợi. Tuy nhiên, cần có thêm các nghiên cứu về sự chấp nhận và nhận thức. Còn nhiều thách thức cần được giải quyết, chẳng hạn như cải thiện tính năng và độ bền của các hệ thống robot này.

Từ khóa

#robot xã hội #liệu pháp #chăm sóc sức khỏe #trẻ em #người lớn #người cao tuổi #hỗ trợ sức khỏe #nghiên cứu robot

Tài liệu tham khảo

Duffy BR, Rooney CFB, Hare GMPO, Donoghue RPSO. What is a social robot ? Computer (Long Beach Calif). 1999:1–3. Feil-Seifer D, Mataric MJ Socially assistive robotics. In: 9th Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robot. 2005. ICORR 2005. IEEE, pp 465–468. Casas J, Cespedes N, Múnera M, Cifuentes CA. Human-robot interaction for rehabilitation scenarios. In: Control Syst. Bio-Robotics Bio-mechatronics with Adv. Appl. Elsevier: Des; 2020. p. 1–31. Tapus A, Maja M, Scassellatti B. The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. 2013. Dawe J, Sutherland C, Barco A, Broadbent E. Can social robots help children in healthcare contexts? A scoping review. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019;3:e000371. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000371. Riek LD. Healthcare robotics. Commun ACM. 2017;60:68–78. Ramírez-Duque AA, Aycardi LF, Villa A, Munera M, Bastos T, Belpaeme T, et al. Collaborative and inclusive process with the autism community: a case study in Colombia about social robot design. Int J Soc Robot. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00627-y. Casas JA, Céspedes N, Cifuentes CA, Gutierrez LF, Rincón-Roncancio M, Múnera M. Expectation vs. reality: attitudes towards a socially assistive robot in cardiac rehabilitation. Appl Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9214651. Fortunati L, Esposito A, Sarrica M, Ferrin G. Children’s knowledge and imaginary about robots. Int J Soc Robot. 2015;7:685–95. Krägeloh CU, Bharatharaj J, Sasthan Kutty SK, Nirmala PR, Huang L. Questionnaires to measure acceptability of social robots: a critical review. Robotics. 2019;8:88. Vandemeulebroucke T, de Casterlé BD, Gastmans C. How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22:149–67. Kory-Westlund JM, Breazeal C. Assessing children’s perceptions and acceptance of a social robot. Proc 18th ACM Int Conf Interact Des Child IDC 2019 38–50. 2019. Coeckelbergh M, Pop C, Simut R, Peca A, Pintea S, David D, et al. A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22:47–65. Pino M, Boulay M, Jouen F, Rigaud AS. “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:1–15. Bartneck C, Belpaeme T, Eyssel F, Kanda T, Keijsers M, Šabanović S. Human-robot interaction. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108676649. Ienca M, Jotterand F, Vică C, Elger B. Social and assistive robotics in dementia care: ethical recommendations for research and practice. Int J Soc Robot. 2016;8:565–73. Martí Carrillo F, Butchart J, Knight S, Scheinberg A, Wise L, Sterling L, et al. In-situ design and development of a socially assistive robot for paediatric rehabilitation. ACM/IEEE Int Conf Hum Robot Interact. 2017:199–200. Rabbitt SM, Kazdin AE, Hong JH. Acceptability of robot-assisted therapy for disruptive behavior problems in children. Arch Sci Psychol. 2015;3:101–10. Looije R, Neerincx MA, Peters JK, Henkemans OAB. Integrating robot support functions into varied activities at returning hospital visits: supporting child’s self-management of diabetes. Int J Soc Robot. 2016;8:483–97. Henkemans OAB, Bierman BPB, Janssen J, Looije R, Neerincx MA, van Dooren MMM, et al. Design and evaluation of a personal robot playing a self-management education game with children with diabetes type 1. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2017;106:63–76. Tung FW. Child perception of humanoid robot appearance and behavior. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2016;32:493–502. Alemi M, Ghanbarzadeh A, Meghdari A, Moghadam LJ. Clinical application of a humanoid robot in pediatric cancer interventions. Int J Soc Robot. 2016;8:743–59. Ramírez-Duque AA, Bastos T, Munera M, Cifuentes CA, Frizera-Neto A. Robot-assisted intervention for children with special needs: a comparative assessment for autism screening. Robot Auton Syst. 2020;127:103484. Srinivasan SM, Kaur M, Park IK, Gifford TD, Marsh KL, Bhat AN. The effects of rhythm and robotic interventions on the imitation/praxis, interpersonal synchrony, and motor performance of children with autism pectrum disorder (ASD): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Autism Res Treat. 2015;2015:1–18. Peca A, Simut R, Pintea S, Vanderborght B. Are children with ASD more prone to test the intentions of the Robonova robot compared to a human? Int J Soc Robot. 2015;7:629–39. Wood LJ, Robins B, Lakatos G, Syrdal DS, Zaraki A, Dautenhahn K. Developing a protocol and experimental setup for using a humanoid robot to assist children with autism to develop visual perspective taking skills. Paladyn. 2019;10:167–79. Zorcec T, Robins B, Dautenhahn K. Getting engaged: assisted play with a humanoid robot Kaspar for children with severe autism. 2018. pp 198–207. Yun SS, Choi JS, Park SK, Bong GY, Yoo HJ. Social skills training for children with autism spectrum disorder using a robotic behavioral intervention system. Autism Res. 2017;10:1306–23. So WC, Wong MKY, Lam CKY, Lam WY, Chui ATF, Lee TL, et al. Using a social robot to teach gestural recognition and production in children with autism spectrum disorders. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:527–39. David DO, Costescu CA, Matu S, Szentagotai A, Dobrean A. Developing joint attention for children with autism in robot-enhanced therapy. Int J Soc Robot. 2018;10:595–605. Zheng Z, Zhao H, Swanson AR, Weitlauf AS, Warren ZE, Sarkar N. Design, development, and evaluation of a noninvasive autonomous robot-mediated joint attention intervention system for young children with ASD. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst. 2018;48:125–35. Chevalier P, Martin JC, Isableu B, Bazile C, Tapus A. Impact of sensory preferences of individuals with autism on the recognition of emotions expressed by two robots, an avatar, and a human. Auton Robot. 2017;41:613–35. So WC, Wong MKY, Lam WY, et al. Robot-based intervention may reduce delay in the production of intransitive gestures in Chinese-speaking preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder. Mol Autism. 2018;9:1–16. Kumazaki H, Yoshikawa Y, Yoshimura Y, et al. The impact of robotic intervention on joint attention in children with autism spectrum disorders. Mol Autism. 2018;9:1–10. Nakadoi Y. Usefulness of animal type robot assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorder in the child and adolescent psychiatric ward. In: Otake M, Kurahashi S, Ota Y, Satoh K, Bekki D, editors. New front. Cham: Artif. Intell. Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 478–82. Jeong S, Logan DE, Goodwin MS, et al. A social robot to mitigate stress, anxiety, and pain in hospital pediatric care. ACM/IEEE Int Conf Human-Robot Interact 02–05-Marc; 2015; 103–104. Jeong S, Breazeal C, Logan D, Weinstock P. Huggable: impact of embodiment on promoting verbal and physical engagement for young pediatric inpatients. RO-MAN 2017 - 26th IEEE Int Symp Robot Hum Interact Commun 2017-Janua:121–126. 2017. Logan DE, Breazeal C, Goodwin MS, Jeong S, O’Connell B, Smith-Freedman D, et al. Social robots for hospitalized children. Pediatrics. 2019;144:e20181511. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1511. Jibb LA, Birnie KA, Nathan PC, Beran TN, Hum V, Victor JC, et al. Using the MEDiPORT humanoid robot to reduce procedural pain and distress in children with cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65:e27242. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.27242. Rossi S, Larafa M, Ruocco M. Emotional and behavioural distraction by a social robot for children anxiety reduction during vaccination. Int J Soc Robot. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00616-w. Beran TN, Ramirez-Serrano A, Vanderkooi OG, Kuhn S. Humanoid robotics in health care: an exploration of children’s and parents’ emotional reactions. J Health Psychol. 2015;20:984–9. Martinez-martin E, Pobil AP Personal robot assistants for elderly care: an overview. 77–91. Klein B, Gaedt L, Cook G. Emotional robots. GeroPsych J Gerontopsychol Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;26:89–99. Moyle W, Bramble M, Jones C, Murfield J. Care staff perceptions of a social robot called Paro and a look-alike plush toy: a descriptive qualitative approach. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22:330–5. Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, de Witte L. Effectiveness of robot Paro in intramural psychogeriatric care: a multicenter quasi-experimental study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16:946–50. Shen Z, Wu Y. Investigation of practical use of humanoid robots in elderly care centres. HAI 2016 - Proc 4th Int Conf Hum Agent Interact 63–66. 2016. Cespedes N, Munera M, Gomez C, Cifuentes CA. Social human-robot interaction for gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020;28:–1307. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2020.2987428. Coşar S, Fernandez-Carmona M, Agrigoroaie R, Pages J, Ferland F, Zhao F, et al. ENRICHME: perception and interaction of an assistive robot for the elderly at home. Int J Soc Robot. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00614-y. Abdollahi H, Mollahosseini A, Lane JT, Mahoor MH. A pilot study on using an intelligent life-like robot as a companion for elderly individuals with dementia and depression. IEEE-RAS Int Conf Humanoid Robot. 2017:541–6. Bechade L, Guillaume D, Pittaro G, Garcia M, Devillers L. Advanced social interaction with agents. Adv Soc Interact with Agents. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92108-2. Damholdt MF, Nørskov M, Yamazaki R, Hakli R, Hansen CV, Vestergaard C, et al. Attitudinal change in elderly citizens toward social robots: the role of personality traits and beliefs about robot functionality. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–13. Valentí Soler M, Agüera-Ortiz L, Olazarán Rodríguez J, Mendoza Rebolledo C, Pérez Muñoz A, Rodríguez Pérez I, et al. Social robots in advanced dementia. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00133. Fischinger D, Einramhof P, Papoutsakis K, Wohlkinger W, Mayer P, Panek P, et al. Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: first prototype and lessons learned. Robot Auton Syst. 2016;75:60–78. Bajones M, Fischinger D, Weiss A, Wolf D, Vincze M, de la Puente P, et al. Hobbit: providing fall detection and prevention for the elderly in the real world. J Robot. 2018;2018:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1754657. Do HM, Pham M, Sheng W, Yang D, Liu M. RiSH: a robot-integrated smart home for elderly care. Robot Auton Syst. 2018;101:74–92. Cavallo F, Limosani R, Manzi A, Bonaccorsi M, Esposito R, Di Rocco M, et al. Development of a socially believable multi-robot solution from town to home. Cogn Comput. 2014;6:954–67. Hendrich N, Bistry H, Zhang J. Architecture and software design for a service robot in an elderly-care scenario. Engineering. 2015;1:027–35. Portugal D, Alvito P, Christodoulou E, Samaras G, Dias J. A study on the deployment of a service robot in an elderly care center. Int J Soc Robot. 2019;11:317–41. Peleka G, Kargakos A, Skartados E, et al. RAMCIP - a service robot for MCI patients at home. 2019; 1–9. Korchut A, Szklener S, Abdelnour C, Tantinya N, Hernández-Farigola J, Ribes JC, et al. Challenges for service robots-requirements of elderly adults with cognitive impairments. Front Neurol. 2017;8:1–12. Anzalone SM, Xavier J, Boucenna S, Billeci L, Narzisi A, Muratori F, et al. Quantifying patterns of joint attention during human-robot interactions: an application for autism spectrum disorder assessment. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2019;118:42–50. Moerman CJ, van der Heide L, Heerink M. Social robots to support children’s well-being under medical treatment: a systematic state-of-the-art review. J Child Health Care. 2019;23:596–612. Bartneck C, Belpaeme T, Eyssel F, Kanda T, Keijsers M, Sabanovic S. Human robot interaction. Hum Robot Interact Introd. 2019;9781108735:6–17.