Social Networks and Religious Violence
Tóm tắt
The causes of religious violence have attracted numerous explanations in the years since the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Towers. However, most forms of religious extremism do not result in violence (e.g., the Amish, Hasidim, Jains) and religious groups have not cornered the market on egregious violence. Nevertheless, religious violence does occur, and this paper examines the interplay of social networks and religious violence. It builds on Cass Sunstein's “law of group polarization,” which predicts that when like-minded people deliberate as an organized group, the general opinion shifts toward extreme versions of their common belief. It argues that internally dense religious groups that maintain few ties to the wider society are more likely to embrace extreme views and behavior than are those that are not as dense and/or remain tied to the wider society. The argument is then tested using social network analysis methodologies to examine the evolution of the Hamburg Cell, which played a critical role in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It concludes with a series of policy recommendations that can limit but not eliminate religious extremism and violent behavior in the future.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
9/11 Commission. 2004. The 9/11 Commission Report. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Borgatti Stephen P, 2002, UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis
Borgatti Stephen P, 2013, Analyzing social networks
Bourdieu Pierre, 1987, Max Weber, rationality and modernity, 119
Callimachi, Rukmini, and Jim Yardley. 2015. From scared amateur to Paris Slaughterer. in The New York Times, vol. 154, 1, 14. New York: The New York Times.
Csárdi, Gábor, and Tamás Nepusz. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695. http://igraph.org.
English Richard, 2004, Armed struggle: The history of the IRA
Fraser, Giles. 2014. To Islamic state, Dabiq is important—But it's not the end of the world. In The Guardian: Guardian News and Media Limited.
Gregg Heather S, 2014, The path to salvation: Religious violence from the crusades to Jihad
Hafez Mohammed M, 2004, Islamic activism: A social movement theory approach, 37
Hall John R, 1987, Gone from the promised land: Jonestown in American cultural history
Juergensmeyer Mark, 2001, Terror in the mind of god
Krackhardt David, 1994, Computational organization theory, 89
Krebs Valdis, 2002, Connections, 24, 43
Lusher Dean, 2013, Structural analysis in the social sciencies
McLaughlin, John M. 2015. Factors of religious violence and a path to peace. Master's Thesis. Monterey, CA: Department of Defense Analysis, Naval Postgraduate School.
Pinker Steven, 2011, The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined
Pitts William L, 1995, Armageddon in Waco: Critical perspectives on the Branch Davidian conflict, 20
Ripley Ruth M, 2015, Manual for RSiena
Roth Randolph, 2009, American homicide
Snijders Tom A B, 1999, Connections, 22, 161
Snijders Tom, 2013, Exponential random graph models for social networks, 130
Stern Jessica, 2003, Terror in the name of God: Why religious militants kill
Sunstein Cass R, 2003, Why societies need dissent
Sunstein Cass R, 2009, Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide
Tilly Charles, 2003, The politics of collective action
Tilly Charles, 2007, Contentious politics
Weber, Max [1922]. 1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
White Harrison C, 1992, Identity and control: A structural theory of social action
White Harrison C, 2008, Identity and control: How social formations emerge
Wink Walter, 1992, Engaging the powers
Zablocki Benjamin D, 1980, Alienation and charisma