Social Media Data Can Be Used to Understand Tourists’ Preferences for Nature‐Based Experiences in Protected Areas

Conservation Letters - Tập 11 Số 1 - 2018
Anna Hausmann1, Tuuli Toivonen2, Rob Slotow1,3, Henrikki Tenkanen2, Atte Moilanen4, Vuokko Heikinheimo2, Enrico Di Minin1,2
1 Amarula Elephant Research Programme, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa,
2Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
3Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK
4Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Research, Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland

Tóm tắt

AbstractCan social media data be used as an alternative to traditional surveys to understand tourists’ preferences for nature‐based experiences in protected areas? We explored this by comparing preferences for biodiversity obtained from a traditional survey conducted in Kruger National Park, South Africa, with observed preferences assessed from over 13,600 pictures shared on Instagram and Flickr by tourists visiting the park in the same period. We found no significant difference between the preferences of tourists as stated in the surveys and the preferences revealed by social media content. Overall, large‐bodied mammals were found to be the favorite group, both in the survey and on social media platforms. However, Flickr was found to better match tourists’ preference for less‐charismatic biodiversity. Our findings suggest that social media content can be used as a cost‐efficient way to explore, and for more continuous monitoring of, preferences for biodiversity and human activities in protected areas.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1006/jeem.1994.1017

10.1007/s13280-015-0705-1

10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074

Bennett P., 2013, Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management, 2537‐2538

10.1371/journal.pbio.1000143

10.1371/journal.pone.0147988

10.1371/journal.pone.0068437

10.1007/s13280-015-0706-0

10.1080/15230406.2013.777137

10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00595.x

10.1111/cobi.12048

10.3389/fenvs.2015.00063

10.1017/S0376892915000314

10.1111/acv.12292

Hauthal E., 2013, Progress in location‐based services, 3‐28

10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

10.1016/j.tourman.2015.02.004

10.1177/2053951714528481

10.1145/1772690.1772751

10.1002/fee.1260

10.1080/15230406.2013.777139

10.1016/j.annals.2015.02.019

10.1017/CBO9780511753831

10.7763/IJFCC.2015.V4.365

Mayer‐Schönberger V., 2013, Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think, 1

10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.006

10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.008

R Development Core Team., 2008, R Foundation for Statistical Computing

10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.034

10.1007/s10531-014-0629-2

10.1007/s13280-015-0708-y

SANParks (South African National Parks). (2015).Annual report 2014/2015. South African National Parks Pretoria South Africa.https://www.sanparks.org/assets/docs/general/annual-report-2015.pdf(visited May 10 2016).

Smith R.J., 2010, Trade‐offs in conservation: deciding what to save, 215‐232

10.1109/CVPR.2014.220

Tufekci Z., 2014, ICWSM'14: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 505‐514 in

Wal R., 2015, Digital conservation: an introduction, Ambio, 44, 517

10.1579/0044-7447-33.8.513

10.1371/journal.pone.0129785

Wood S.A., 2013, Using social media to quantify nature‐based tourism and recreation, Sci. Rep., 1

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Conservation Letters

Tập 11 Số 1

Thông tin tác giả