Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda

International Journal of Management Reviews - Tập 16 Số 4 - Trang 417-436 - 2014
Bob Doherty1, Helen Haugh2, Fergus Lyon3
1The York Management School, University of York, Freboys Lane, York YO10 5GD, UK
2Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1AG, UK
3Middlesex University, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, UK

Tóm tắt

The impacts of the global economic crisis of 2008, the intractable problems of persistent poverty and environmental change have focused attention on organizations that combine enterprise with an embedded social purpose. Scholarly interest in social enterprise (SE) has progressed beyond the early focus on definitions and context to investigate their management and performance. From a review of the SE literature, the authors identify hybridity, the pursuit of the dual mission of financial sustainability and social purpose, as the defining characteristic of SEs. They assess the impact of hybridity on the management of the SE mission, financial resource acquisition and human resource mobilization, and present a framework for understanding the tensions and trade‐offs resulting from hybridity. By examining the influence of dual mission and conflicting institutional logics on SE management the authors suggest future research directions for theory development for SE and hybrid organizations more generally.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/089976409102000104

10.1332/204080510X538365

10.1177/0021886304266847

10.1108/17508610910956390

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x

Bacchiega A., 2001, The Emergence of Social Enterprise, 273

10.1086/230541

10.5465/amj.2010.57318391

Battilana J., 2012, In search of the hybrid ideal, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10, 51

10.1177/089976409102000106

10.1007/978-0-230-36439-4_3

10.2307/41166496

10.4324/9780203164679

10.4324/9780203164679

Bradach J., 2003, Going to scale: the challenge of replicating social programs, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1, 18

10.1080/01900692.2011.605090

Bransden T., 2005, Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector, International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 1749

10.1080/08985626.2010.488404

10.1080/0264206042000305457

10.1093/jopart/mun025

10.1177/0266242607071779

Chertok M., 2008, The funding gap, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 26, 44

10.1177/0095399703256162

10.1007/s11266-006-9010-8

10.1007/s10551-007-9500-7

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00382.x

10.1111/j.1467-8292.2004.00241.x

10.1007/978-0-230-36439-4_4

Cukier W., 2011, Social entrepreneurship: a content analysis, Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7, 99

10.2307/256409

10.5465/amp.24.3.37

10.1287/orsc.1100.0620

10.1002/nml.43

10.1007/s10551-010-0468-3

10.1007/s10551-009-0145-6

10.2307/3857527

Dees J.G., 1998, Enterprising non‐profits, Harvard Business Review, 76, 55

Dees J.G., 2004, Scaling social impact, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1, 24

Defourny J., 2006, Social Enterprise at the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society, 1

10.1080/19420670903442053

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x

10.1177/0170840609334954

Doherty B., 2009, Management for Social Enterprise, 10.4135/9781446269404

DTI, 2002, Social Enterprise: A Strategy for Success

10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x

European Commission(2011).Creating a favourable climate for social enterprises key stakeholders in the social economy and innovation. Social Business Initiative. Available at:http://eur‐lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0682:FIN:EN:PDF(accessed 21 September 2012).

10.1177/0969776407072664

10.1081/PAD-200067318

10.1177/1440783309346474

Foster W., 2005, Should nonprofits seek profits?, Harvard Business Review, 83, 92

10.1002/sd.274

10.5465/amj.2006.20785498

10.2307/796089

Harvey C., 2010, Academic Journal Quality Guide Version 4

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00168.x

10.1093/cje/bem027

10.1007/s10551-005-0132-5

10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005

10.1093/jeg/lbp005

10.2307/1252069

10.5465/amj.2010.0772

10.1177/0899764007300385

10.1007/s11266-010-9126-8

10.4135/9781849200387.n10

10.1111/j.1744-1714.2003.tb00002.x

Laville J.‐L., 2001, The Emergence of Social Enterprise, 312

10.1007/s11187-011-9398-4

10.1177/0899764011411722

10.1108/03068290610660652

10.1007/s11187-011-9399-3

Lyon F., 2011, Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets, 139

10.1108/17508611211226593

10.1177/0269094212455158

10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002

10.1108/17508611011043020

10.1108/17508611211252846

10.1080/02690942.2010.504570

10.1080/08985626.2012.670916

McKay S. Moro D. Teasdale S.andClifford D.(2011).The marketisation of charities in England and Wales.Working Paper 69 Third Sector Research Centre.

10.1177/0969776407077742

10.1177/0899764002313004

10.1002/sres.1006

10.1080/02673037.2012.689171

Munoz S.A., 2008, Selling to the public sector – prospects and problems for social enterprise in the UK, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 32, 43

10.1007/s10551-008-9921-y

10.2307/2393531

10.1007/s10551-009-0358-8

10.1016/j.aos.2009.08.001

10.1080/19420671003701257

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x

10.4135/9781446211526

10.1007/s10551-006-9200-8

Nyssens M., 2006, Social Enterprise at the Crossroads of Market, Public Policies and Civil Society

OED, 2010, Oxford English Dictionary

10.1080/14719030701763187

10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368

Pache A.C.andSantos F.(2011).Inside the hybrid organization: an organizational level view of responses to conflicting institutional demands. ESSEC Research Center Working Paper 1101. ESSEC Business School Cergy Pontoise.

10.5465/amj.2011.0405

10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039b014

10.1080/08985620701800507

10.1108/17508610810901995

10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007

10.1080/08985626.2010.488402

10.1177/0001839212446689

10.2307/41165267

10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.000455

10.1108/17508610780000718

Ruef M., 2000, The emergence of organizational forms: a community ecology approach, Journal of Sociology, 106, 658

10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.012

Salamon M.L., 2003, Global Civil Society: An Overview.

10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4

10.1007/s10551-011-0851-8

10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006

Sepulveda L. Syrett S.andCalvo S.(2010).Social enterprise and ethnic minorities. Working Paper 48 Third Sector Research Centre (TSRC).

10.1068/c11319

10.1080/03085147.2012.661627

10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.06.003

10.1080/08985626.2011.580161

10.1080/0898562042000197135

10.1177/0899764006296049

10.1108/17508611211252837

10.1332/204080510X538257

10.1177/0952076711401466

10.1080/19420676.2012.762800

10.1023/B:VOLU.0000046280.06580.d8

10.1108/00251740010340517

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00248.x

10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00194.x

10.1287/orsc.1090.0522

10.1007/s10551-010-0419-z

10.1177/0266242612457700

Wallace S.L., 1999, Social entrepreneurship: the role of social purpose enterprises in facilitating community economic development, Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 4, 153

10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001

10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199821)17:2<165::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-M

Weisbrod B.A., 1997, The future of the non‐profit sector: its entwining with private enterprise and government, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 175

10.1007/s11187-011-9401-0

10.1002/nml.12202

Young D.R., 2002, The State of Nonprofit America, 423

10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

International Journal of Management Reviews

Tập 16 Số 4

417-436

Thông tin tác giả