Sociability and preference for social novelty in five inbred strains: an approach to assess autistic‐like behavior in mice

Genes, Brain and Behavior - Tập 3 Số 5 - Trang 287-302 - 2004
Sheryl S. Moy1,2,3, Jessica J. Nadler4,1,2, Antonio Pérez1, Ryan P. Barbaro4,2, J. M. Johns1,3, Terry Magnuson4,1,2, J Piven1,2,3, Jacqueline N. Crawley5,1,2,3
1Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Center and Departments of
2North Carolina STAART Center for Autism Research,
3Psychiatry, and
4Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC and
5Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, Intramural Research Program National Institute of Mental Health Bethesda MD 20892‐1375 USA

Tóm tắt

Deficits in social interaction are important early markers for autism and related neurodevelopmental disorders with strong genetic components. Standardized behavioral assays that measure the preference of mice for initiating social interactions with novel conspecifics would be of great value for mutant mouse models of autism. We developed a new procedure to assess sociability and the preference for social novelty in mice. To quantitate sociability, each mouse was scored on measures of exploration in a central habituated area, a side chamber containing an unfamiliar conspecific (stranger 1) in a wire cage, or an empty side chamber. In a secondary test, preference for social novelty was quantitated by presenting the test mouse with a choice between the first, now‐familiar, conspecific (stranger 1) in one side chamber, and a second unfamiliar mouse (stranger 2) in the other side chamber. Parameters scored included time spent in each chamber and number of entries into the chambers. Five inbred strains of mice were tested, C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, FVB/NJ, A/J and B6129PF2/J hybrids. Four strains showed significant levels of sociability (spend‐ ing more time in the chamber containing stranger 1 than in the empty chamber) and a preference for social novelty (spending more time in the chamber containing stranger 2 than in the chamber containing the now‐familiar stranger 1). These social preferences were observed in both male and female mice, and in juveniles and adults. The exception was A/J, a strain that demonstrated a preference for the central chamber. Results are discussed in terms of potential applications of the new methods, and the proper controls for the interpretation of social behavior data, including assays for health, relevant sensory abilities and motor functions. This new standardized procedure to quantitate sociability and preference for social novelty in mice provides a method to assess tendencies for social avoidance in mouse models of autism.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐IV).

Bachevalier J., 1991, Advances in Neuropsychiatry and Psychopharmacology, 129

10.1017/S0033291700028099

Bakker C.E., 1994, Fmr1 knockout mice: a model to study fragile X mental retardation, Cell, 78, 23

10.1037/0735-7044.117.4.854

Baranek G.T., 2002, Efficacy of sensory and motor interventions for children with autism, J Autism Dev Disorders, 32, 397, 10.1023/A:1020541906063

10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19991215)88:6<609::AID-AJMG7>3.3.CO;2-C

10.1212/WNL.35.6.866

10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01276-7

10.1016/0306-4530(93)90028-J

10.1023/A:1005596502855

10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00200-0

10.1016/j.brainres.2003.12.013

10.1016/0149-7634(94)00070-H

10.2466/pr0.1971.29.1.195

10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00036-7

10.1002/dev.10036

Crawley J.N., 2000, What's Wrong with My Mouse? Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice

10.1016/0006-8993(93)90860-P

10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00292-X

10.1038/77040

10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01273-1

10.1038/35103559

10.1023/A:1025054610557

10.1016/0376-6357(94)90060-4

10.1163/156853963X00185

10.1002/ajmg.1320230128

10.1001/archneur.1993.00540120019007

10.1097/00001756-199612200-00040

10.1038/sj.npp.1300164

10.1007/s00335-001-4006

10.1038/35053579

Kanner L., 1943, Autistic disturbances of affective contact, Nervous Child, 2, 217

10.1007/BF01537984

10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(2000)10:1<47::AID-HIPO5>3.0.CO;2-6

10.1016/S0149-7634(98)00021-9

10.1016/S0031-9384(96)80011-4

10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80354-2

10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00115-X

10.1023/A:1005592401947

10.1007/BF02327579

10.1007/BF01067821

10.1002/hipo.10005

10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81972-8

Nadler J.J., 2004, Automated apparatus for quantitation of social approach behaviors in mice., Genes Brain Behav, 3, 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2004.00071.x

10.1016/S0006-8993(01)03309-1

10.1016/S1056-4993(02)00047-0

10.1093/hmg/9.8.1145

10.1002/ajmg.10041

10.1002/1096-8628(20010108)105:1<34::AID-AJMG1052>3.0.CO;2-D

10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970725)74:4<398::AID-AJMG11>3.0.CO;2-D

10.1086/302497

Ritvo E.R., 1989, The UCLA‐University of Utah epidemiologic survey of autism: recurrence risk estimates and genetic counseling, Am J Psychia, 146, 1036

Schloper E., 1987, Neurobiological Issues in Autism

10.1001/archpsyc.57.4.331

10.1086/physzool.24.4.30152137

10.1002/ajmg.10153

Shih J.C., 1999, MAO‐A and – B gene knock‐out mice exhibit distinctly different behavior, Neurobiology, 7, 235

10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80491-2

10.1023/A:1026096203946

10.1002/1098-2779(200102)7:1<21::AID-MRDD1004>3.0.CO;2-3

Tang A.C., 2003, Modification of social memory, hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis, and brain asymmetry by neonatal novelty exposure, J Neurosci, 23, 8254, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-23-08254.2003

10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00782-7

10.1007/BF00421275

10.2527/jas1989.6771841x

10.1034/j.1601-183X.2003.00012.x

10.1093/jn/132.1.68

Winslow J.T., 2003, Current Protocols in Neuroscience

10.1007/BF02245626

10.1054/npep.2002.0909

10.1037/0735-7044.117.1.21

10.1038/sj.mp.4001175

10.1042/bj20021523