Smarter Reform: Moving beyond Single-Program Solutions to an Early Care and Education System in the United States

Louise Stoney1, Anne Mitchell1, Mildred Warner2
1Alliance for Early Childhood Finance, Averill Park, USA
2Cornell University, Ithaca, USA

Tóm tắt

Proposals to improve early care and education (ECE) in the United States are often based on narrow conceptions of the value, benefits, and appropriate structure of services. The result is an increasing number of initiatives that focus only on a single aspect of the system (e.g., preschool for poor children) and assume this limited intervention can produce large results. This paper argues that to realize ECE’s potential to benefit children, families, and the US economy, the focus of reform proposals must broaden. The paper highlights the need for public investment that recognizes our children’s full worth and that reflects the value of family caregiving by supporting unpaid as well as market care. The paper presents an alternative proposal that takes into account the complexity and special nature of ECE markets and that calls for a range of investment strategies and a commitment to a level of institutional support commensurate with a high-quality ECE system.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barnett, S. (1996). Lives in the balance: Age-27 benefit-cost analysis of the High/Scope Perry Preschool program. (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, No. 11). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press. Barnett, S. (2002). Early childhood education. In A. Molnar (Ed.), School reform proposals: The research evidence. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Barnett, S., & Ackerman, D. J. (2006). Costs, benefits, and the long-term effects of preschool programs. Community Development: The Journal of the Community Development Society, 37(2), 86–100. Barnett, S., Brown, K., & Shore, R. (2004). The universal vs. targeted debate: Preschool policy matters. (NIEER Policy Brief, Issue 6). New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research. Barnett, S., Schulman, K., & Shore, R. (2004). Class size: What’s the best fit? (NIEER Policy Brief, Issue 9). New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research. Belfield, C. (2004). Early childhood education: How important are the cost-savings to the school system? Albany, NY: Center for Early Care and Education. Bell, L., & Newman, S. (2003). Paid family & medical leave: Why we need it and how we can get it. Washington, DC: Family Caregiver Alliance. Bond, J. T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2003). Highlights of the national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute. Brandon, R., Maher, E., Guanghui, L., & Joesch, J. (2004). Orchestrating access to affordable, high quality early care and education for all young children. Seattle, WA: Human Services Policy Center. Brown, E., & Scott-Little, C. (2003). Evaluations of school readiness initiatives: What are we learning? Tallahassee, FL: Southeastern Regional Vision for Education (SERVE). Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Gruber, C. P., & Fitzgerald, L. M. (1994). Children at home and in day care. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Committee for Economic Development. (2002). Preschool for all: Investing in a productive and just society. New York: Author. Cost, Quality and Child Outcomes Study Team. (1995). Cost, quality and child outcomes in child care centers. Denver, CO: University of Colorado. Crittenden, A. (2001). The price of motherhood. New York: Metropolitan Books. Dugger, R. H. (2005). U.S. workforce quality, fiscal sustainability, a ten-year plan. (Working Paper, No. 4). New York: Committee for Economic Development, Invest in Kids Working Group. Epstein, A., Schweinhart, L., DeBruin-Parecki, A., & Robin, K. B. (2004). Preschool assessment: A guide to developing a balanced approach. (NIEER Policy Brief, Issue 7). New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research. Fiene, R. (2002). Thirteen indicators of quality childcare: Research update 2002. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado: National Resource Center for Health and Safety in Child Care. Finn, J. D., Gerber, S., Achilles, C., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2002). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 103(2), 145–183. Folbre, N. (2005). Eliminating economic penalties on caregivers. In J. Heymann & C. Beem (Eds.), Unfinished work: Building equality and democracy in an era of working families. New York: The New Press. Folbre, N. (2006). Rethinking the child care sector, community development. The Journal of the Community Development Society, 37(2), 38–52. Gilliam, W., & Ziegler, E. (2004). State efforts to evaluate the effects of prekindergarten: 1977 to 2003. New Haven, CT: Yale University Child Study Center. Gormley, W., & Phillips, D. (2003). The effects of universal Pre-K in Oklahoma: Research highlights and policy implications. (Working Paper, No. 2). Washington, DC: The Center for Research on Children in the United States. Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Gornick, J., & Meyers, M. (2005). Supporting a dual earner/dual-career society. In J. Heymann & C. Beem (Eds.), Unfinished work: Building equality and democracy in an era of working families. New York: The New Press. Gruenwald, R., & Rolnick, A. (2004). A proposal for achieving high returns on early childhood development. Paper presented at the conference of on the Committee for Economic Development. Washington, DC. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/studies/earlychild/highreturn.pdf Halpern, D. F. (2004). Public policy, work, and families: The report of the APA presidential initiative on work and families. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Harrington, M. (1999). Care and equality: Inventing a new family politics. New York: Routledge. Hart Research Associates & American Viewpoint. (2005). North Carolina voters on early education: Findings from a statewide survey among registered voters, conducted April 18–21, 2005. Washington, DC: Pre-K Now. Heckman, J. L., & Masterov, D. (2004). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://jenni.uchicago.edu/Invest/FILES/dugger_2004-12-2_dvm.pdf Helburn, S., & Bergmann, B. (2002). America’s childcare problem: The way out. New York: Palagrave. Henry, G., Henderson, L., Ponder, B., & Gordon, C. (2003). Report of findings from the early childhood study: 2001–02. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. Howes, C. (1983). Caregiver behavior in center and family day care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4, 99–107. Kagan, S. L. (2005). Creating a comprehensive early learning and assessment system. Paper presented at the Early Childhood Finance Reform Meeting. Greensboro, NC: National Smart Start Technical Assistance Center. Kamerman, S. B. (2001). An overview of ECEC developments in OECD countries. In S. B. Kamerman (Ed.), Early childhood education and care: International perspectives. New York: Institute for Child and Family Policy, Columbia University. Karoly, L. A., & Bigelow, J. H. (2005). The economics of investing in universal preschool education in California. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Kimmel, J. (2006). Child care, female employment and economic growth. Community Development: The Journal of the Community Development Society, 37(2), 71–85. Landefeld, J. S., & S. H. McCulla. (2000). Accounting for nonmarket household production within a national accounts framework. Review of Income and Wealth 46(3), 289–307. Lombardi, J. (2003). Time to care: Redesigning child care to promote education, support families and build communities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Longman, P. (2004, March, 1). Raising hell: How the punishing costs of childrearing imperil us all. The Washington Monthly. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0403.longman.html Lynch, R. (2004). Exceptional returns: Economic, fiscal, and social benefits of investment in early childhood development. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved December 8, 2008 from http://www.epi.org/books/exceptional/exceptional_returns_(full).pdf Meisels, S. (2003). Can Head Start pass the test? Education Week, 22(27), 44/209. Meyers, M., & Jordan, L. (2006). Choice and accommodation in Parental Child Care Decisions. Community Development: The Journal of the Community Development Society, 37(2), 53–70. Minnesota Department of Human Services. (2005). School readiness in child care setting: A developmenttal assessment of children in 22 child care centers. St. Paul, MN: MN DHS. Mitchell, A. (2005). Stair steps to quality: A guide for states and communities developing quality rating systems for early care and education. Alexandria, VA: United Way of America, Success by 6. Mitchell, A., & Stoney, L. (2006). Financing early childhood care and education system in the States: A standards-based approach. Houston, TX: Rice University Baker policy Institute, Texas Program for Society and Health. Mitchell, A., Stoney, L., & Dichter, H. (2001). Financing child care in the United States: An expanded catalog of current strategies 2000 edition. Kansas City, MO: The Ewing and Marion Kauffman Foundation. Morrissey, T. W., Lekies, K. S., & Cochran, M. M. (2007). New York’s universal prekindergarten program: An exploratory study of impacts. Early Education and Development, 18, 573–596. Morrissey, T. W., & M, E, Warner. (2007). Why early care and education deserves as much attention, or more, than prekindergarten alone. Applied Developmental Science, 11(2), 57–70 Munton, T., Mooney, A., Moss, P., Petrie, P., Clark, A., & Woolner, J. (2002). Review of international research on the relationship between ratios, staff qualifications and training, group size, and the quality of provision in early years and child care settings. London: Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. National Education Goals Panel. (1998). Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington, DC: Author. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2000). Characteristics and quality of child care for toddlers and preschoolers. Applied Developmental Sciences, 4, 116–135. OECD. (2001). Starting strong: Early childhood education and care. Paris: Author. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://www.childcarecanada.org/pubs/bn/startingstrong.html Overturf, J. (2005). Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: Winter 2002. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p70-101.pdf Peisner-Feinberg, E., Burchinal, M., Clifford, R., Culkin, M., Howes, C., Kagan, S. L., & Yazejian, N. (2001). The relation of preschool child-care quality to children’s cognitive and social developmental trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72(5), 1534–1553. Phillips, D. (1995). Child care for low-income families: Summary of two workshops. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Phillips, D., Mekos, D., Scarr, S., McCartney, K., & Abbott-Shim, M. (2000). Within and beyond the classroom door: Assessing quality in child care centers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(4), 475–496. Phillipsen, L. C., Burchinal, M. R., Howes, C., & Cryer, D. (1997). The prediction of process quality from structural features of child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 281–303. Pratt, J. E. (2007). “An input-output approach to valuing non-market household time.” International Journal of Economic Development, 9(4), 239–268. Raudenbush, S. (2004). Schooling, statistics and poverty: Can we measure school improvement? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Rock, D., & Stenner, A. J. (2005). Assessment issues in the testing of young children at school entry. The Future of Children, 15(1), 15–34. Rolnick, A., & Grunewald, R. (2003, December). Early childhood development: Economic development with a high public return. Fedgazette. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://www.minneapolisfed.org/pubs/fedgaz/03-03/earlychild.cfm Schulman, K. (2003). Key facts: Essential information about child care, early education and school-age care. Washington, DC: Children’s Defense Fund. Schulman, K., & Barnett, W. S. (2005, March). The benefits of prekindergarten for middle income children. (NIEER Policy Report). Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://nieer.org/resources/policyreports/report3.pdf Scott-Little, C., Kagan, S. L., & Frelow, V. F. (2005). Inside the content: The breadth and depth of early learning standards. Greensboro, NC: SERVE. Shonkoff, J., & Phillips, D. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early child development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Shore, R. (1997). Rethinking the brain. New York: Families and Work Institute. Shore, R., Bondrova, E., & Leong, D. (2004). Child outcome standards in pre-K programs: What are standards; what is needed to make them work? (NIEER Policy Brief, Issue 5). New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research. Stoney, L. (1998). Looking into new mirrors: Lessons for early childhood finance and system-building. Boston, MA: Horizons Initiative. Stoney, L. (2004). Collective management of early childhood programs: Approaches that aim to maximize efficiency, help improve quality and stabilize the industry. Raleigh, NC: Cornell University and the National Smart Start Technical Assistance Center. Stoney, L., & Mitchell A. (2007). Using tax credits to promote high quality early care and education services. Washington, DC: Partnership for America’s Economic Success. Vandell, D. L., & Wolfe, B. (2002). Child care quality: Does it matter and does it need to be improved? Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Volling, B. L., & Feagans, L. V. (1995). Infant day care and children’s social competence. Infant Behavior and Development, 18, 177–188. Wagner, S. L. (2003). Assessment in the early childhood classroom: Asking the right questions, acting on the answers. Applied Research in Child Development, 4(4), 1–16. Warner, M. E., Adriance, S., Barai, N., Hallas, J., Markeson, B., Morrissey, T., & Soref, W. (2004). Economic development strategies to promote quality child care. Ithaca, NY: Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University. Warner, M. E., Ribeiro, R., & Smith, A. (2003). Addressing the affordability gap: Framing child care as economic development. Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development, 12(3), 294–313. Warner, M. E. (2006). Putting child care in the regional economy: Empirical and conceptual challenges and economic development prospects, Community Development: The Journal of the Community Development Society, 37(2), 7–22. Warner, M. E., (2007). Child care and economic development: Markets, households and public policy. International Journal of Economic Development, 9(3), 111–121. Warner, M. E. (2008, forthcoming). (Not) Valuing care: A review of recent popular economic reports. Feminist Economics, 15(3). Warner, M. E., & Liu, Z. (2005). Economic development policy and local services: The case of child care. International Journal of Economic Development, 7(1), 25–64. Warner, M. E., & Liu, Z. (2006). The importance of child care in economic development: A comparative analysis of regional economic linkage. Economic Development Quarterly, 20(1), 97–103. Witte, A. D., & Trowbridge, M. (2006). The structure of early care and education in the United States: Historical evolution and international comparisons. Tax Policy and the Economy, 19, 1–37.