Slum dwellers response to flooding events in the megacities of India

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 15 - Trang 337-353 - 2010
Monalisa Chatterjee1
1Department of Geography, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA

Tóm tắt

Megacities in developing countries are rapidly transforming places. Under the impetus of global change processes and consequent transformations at the environmental, social, cultural, political and economical scales; factors causing disasters and losses are changing every day. These changes are also altering society’s ability to respond to hazard events. This paper examines the response of slum dwellers who are the most vulnerable and marginal section of urban population and often located in places with high hazard risk with less or no means to reduce the impact of flood events. Marginal population groups in megacities suffer the negative consequences of large scale global change processes and do not benefit from the risk mitigation strategies adopted by city authorities. The paper therefore argues that people living in informal settlements instead have to employ a combination of structural means and complex networks of assistance to recover from floods. Based on the results deduced from data collected with the help of household surveys in the slums of Mumbai, the study demonstrates the types of coping strategies used by slum dwellers and the changing characteristics of these mechanisms under the influence of global change processes in megacities. Furthermore, results show that capacity to respond is not equally distributed among slum dwellers due to underlying socio cultural divisions and emerging economic and political constraints. The paper concludes that to address existing discrepancies in urban societies and within slum settlements, flood mitigation strategies will have to be (1) more inclusive of marginal population (2) sensitive to the limitations and scope of old and new social structures and (3) incorporate innovative networks of support to deal with the consequences of global change.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander C (1978) A city is not a tree. In: Kaplan SKaR (ed) Humanscape: Environments for people. Duxbury, Massachusetts, pp 377–401 Alexander D (2000) Confronting catastrophe. Oxford University Press, New York Amendola AJL-B, Okada N, Shi P (2008) Towards integrated disaster risk management: case studies and trends from asia. Nat Hazards 44:163–168 Aragon-Durand F (2007) Urbanization and flood vulnerability in the peri urban interface of Mexico City. Disasters 31:477–494 Arunachalam, B. (2005). Drainage problems of Brihan Mumbai. Economic Political Weekly, September 3 Bendimerad F, Fernandez J, Reyes M (2008) Enhancing city-to-city sharing and social participation in disaster risk reduction earthquakes and megacities initiatives Bigio AG (2003) Cities and climate change. In: Kreimer A, Arnold M, Carlin A (eds) Building safer cities. World Bank, Washington DC, pp 91–99 Bohle H-G (2001) Vulnerability and criticality International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change Update, 2001 Bombay Community Public Trust (2003) Posha Nakhwa municipal school: Profile of the community. Bombay Community Public Trust, Mumbai Census of India (2001a) District-specific literates and literacy rates. Government of India Census of India (2001b) Population trends - 2001. Census of India Census of India (2001c) Provisional tables. Literary Rate. GOvernment of India Chatterjee M (2008) Shifting vulnerabilities: a study in flood affected slums of Mumbai. UNU Source 10:100–109 Chen L-C, Liu Y-C, Chan K-C (2006) Integrated community based disaster management program in Taiwan: a case study of Shang- An village. Nat Hazards 37:209–223 Concerned Citizen’s Commission (2005a). Mumbai marooned: an enquiry into Mumbai floods—An executive summary. Mumbai Concerned Citizen’s Commission (2005b). Mumbai marooned: an enquiry into the Mumbai floods, 2005 Full Report. Mumbai, Conservation Action Trust: 115. http://cat.org.in/index.php/site/article/concerned-citizens-commission-an-enquiry-into-mumbais-floods-2005/ Cybriwsky R (2001) City profile: Jakarta. Cities 18:199–210 Das PK (2003) Slums: The continuing struggle for housing. In: Patel S, Masselos J (eds) Bombay and Mumbai: The City in transition. Oxford University Press, Bombay, pp 207–234 Davis M (2004) Planet of slums—Urban involution and the informal proletariat. New Left Review 5–34 Dutt AK, Noble AG, Venugopal G, Subbiah S (eds) (2003) Challenges to Asian urbanization in the 21st century. Kluwer Academic, Netherlands Erdik M, Durukal E (2008) Earthquake and its mitigation in Istanbul. Nat Hazards 44:181–197 Faisal IM, Kabir MR, Nishat A (2003) The Disastrous flood of 1998 and long term mitigation strategies for Dhaka City. Nat Hazards 28:85–99 Fernandez JSM, Bendimerad F, Cardona OD (2006) Application of indicators in urban and megacities disaster risk management: a case study of Metro Manila. Earthquakes and Megacities Initiatives Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Hosseini M (2008) Post BAM recovery and reconstruction. Nat Hazards 44:229–241 Gilbert A (2005) The challenge of slums: global report on human settlements 2003. Prog Hum Geogr 29:118–120 Government of Maharashtra, I (2005) Maharashtra floods 2005. 17. Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai Gulis GM, Mulumba JAA, Juma O, Kakosova B (2004) Health status of people of slums in Nairobi, Kenya. Environ Res 96:219–227 Gulkan P (2002) Setting the stage for urban risk mitigation: seismic risks and compulsory insurance policy issues in Turkey. In Second Annual IIASA-DPRI Meeting Laxenburg, Austria Gupta K (2007) Urban flood resilience planning and management and lessons for the future: a case study of Mumbai, India. Urban Water J 4:183–194 Haque CE, Etkin D (2007) People and community as constituent parts of hazards: the significance of societal dimensions in hazards analysis. Nat Hazards 41:271–282 Hardoy JE, Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D (2001) Environmental problems in an urbanizing world. Earthscan, London Huq S, Alam M (2003) Flood management and vulnerability of Dhaka City. In: Kreimer A, Arnold M, Carlin A (eds) Building safer cities. World Bank, Washington DC, pp 121–135 IHDP (2005) Science plan: Urbanization and global environment change. International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, Bonn IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: Synthesis teport: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. ed. R. K. a. A. R. Pachauri, 104. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC IPCC (2007b) Industry, settlement and society. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Van Der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 976 Jones B (2004) The geography of vulnerability: Who is at risk to multiple hazards in greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada? University of Waterloo (Canada), Canada Khan MR, Rahman MA (2007) Partnership approach to disaster management in Bangladesh: a critical policy assessment. Nat Hazards 41 Kraas F (2007) Megacities and global change: key priorities. The Geographical Journal 173:79–82 Liu J-T, Hammitt JK (1999) Perceived risk and value of workplace safety in a developing country. Journal of Risk Research, Journal of Risk Research J1 - Journal of Risk Research 2:263–275 Manuta J, Lebel L (2005) Climate change and the risks of flood disasters in Asia: Crafting adaptive and just institutions. Unit for Social and Environmental Research, Thailand Marcuse P, Van Kempen R (2000) Globalizing cities: A new spatial order. Blackwell Publishing Professional McGranahan GPJ, Songsore J, Surjadi C, Kjellen M (2001) The citizen at risk. Earthscan, London Mills E (2005) Insurance in a climate of change. Science 309:1040–1046 Mitchell JK (1999) Crucibles of hazard: Mega-cities and disasters in transition. United Nations University Press, Tokyo Mitchell JK (2005) Urban disasters as indicators of global environmental change: Assessing functional varieties of urban vulnerability. In: System E (ed) Science in the anthropocene. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 132–152 MMRDA (1996) Mumbai Regional Plan Document MMRDA MMRDA (1998) Mumbai disaster management plan. MMRDA, Mumbai Muller M (2007) Adapting to climate change: water management for urban resilience. Environ Urban 19:99–113 Neekhra V (2008) Growing vulnerability crisis “ Will slums ever reduce or improve?”. In: Kidokoro T, Okata J, Matasumura S, Shima N (eds) Vulnerable cities: Realities, innovations and strategies. Springer, Tokyo, pp 77–104 O’Hare G, Abbott D, Barke M (1998) A review of slum housing policies in Mumbai. Cities 15:269–283 Pacific Disaster Center (2005) Metropolitan Manila, The Philippines disaster risk management profile. Pacific Disaster Center and Earthquake and Megacities Initiatives Pacific Disaster Center (2006) Dhaka, Bangladesh Disaster Risk Manangement Profile. Pacific Disaster Center and Earthquake and Megacities Initiatives Pearce L (2003) Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: how to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 28:211–228 Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities- natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, London Planning Commission I (1951) First five year plan. Government of India, New Delhi Pryer JA (2003) Poverty and vulnerability in Dhaka slums: The urban livelihoods study. Ashgate UK Quarantelli EL (2001) Urban vulnerability to disasters in developing countries: managing risks. In Disaster Research Center, 25. Newark: University of Delaware Tyner JA (2000) Global cities and circuits of global labor: the case of Manila, Philippines. Prof Geogr 52:61–74 Uitto JI (1998) The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities: a theoretical framework. Appl Geogr 18:7–16 UN - Habitat (2006) State of the World’s Cities Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme Waley P (2005) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Geogr J 171:190–191 Wang J-a, Shi P-j, Yi X-s, Jia H-c, Zhu L-y (2008) The Regionalization of Urban disasters in China. Natural Hazards 44:169–179 Wenzel FFB, Bendimerad F, Sinha R (2007) Megacities-megarisks. Nat Hazards 42:481–491 Winayanti L, Lang HC (2004) Provision of urban services in an informal settlement: a case study of Kampung Penas Tanggul, Jakarta. Habitat Int 28:41–65 Wisner B (1998) Marginality and vulnerability: why the homeless of Tokyo don’t ‘count’ in disaster preparations. Appl Geogr 18:25–33 Wisner B (2002) Disaster risk reduction in megacities: Making the most of human and social capital. In: Kreimier A, Arnold M, Carlin A (eds) Building safer cities. World Bank, Washington DC Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, New York Yucemen MS (2005) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake insurance rates for Turkey. Nat Hazards 35:291–313