Slower progression of Parkinson's disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: The REAL‐PET study

Annals of Neurology - Tập 54 Số 1 - Trang 93-101 - 2003
Alan Whone1, Ray L. Watts2, A. Jon Stoessl3, Margaret R. Davis2, Sven N. Reske4, Claude Nahmias5, Anthony E. Lang6, Olivier Rascol7, Maria João Ribeiro8, Philippe Rémy8, Werner Poewe9, Robert A. Hauser10, David J. Brooks1
1Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
2Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
3University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
4Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
5McMaster University, Hamilton
6Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
7Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Investigation Centre, INSERM U455, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse
8CEA-CNRS URA 2210, Service Hospitalier F. Joliot, Orsay, France
9Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
10University of South Florida and Tampa General Healthcare, Tampa, FL

Tóm tắt

AbstractPreclinical studies suggest ropinirole (a D2/D3 dopamine agonist) may be neuroprotective in Parkinson's disease (PD), and a pilot clinical study using 18F‐dopa positron emission tomography (PET) suggested a slower loss of striatal dopamine storage with ropinirole compared with levodopa. This prospective, 2‐year, randomized, double‐blind, multinational study compared the rates of loss of dopamine‐terminal function in de novo patients with clinical and 18F‐dopa PET evidence of early PD, randomized 1 to 1 to receive either ropinirole or levodopa. The primary outcome measure was reduction in putamen 18F‐dopa uptake (Ki) between baseline and 2‐year PET. Of 186, 162 randomized patients were eligible for analysis. A blinded, central, region‐of‐interest analysis showed a significantly lower reduction (p = 0.022) in putamen Ki over 2 years with ropinirole (−13.4%; n = 68) compared with levodopa (−20.3%; n = 59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–13.06). Statistical parametric mapping localized lesser reductions in 18F‐dopa uptake in the putamen and substantia nigra with ropinirole. The greatest Ki decrease in each group was in the putamen (ropinirole, −14.1%; levodopa, −22.9%; 95% CI, 4.24–13.3), but the decrease was significantly lower with ropinirole compared with levodopa (p < 0.001). Ropinirole is associated with slower progression of PD than levodopa as assessed by 18F‐dopa PET. Ann Neurol 2003

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1136/jnnp.51.6.745

10.1056/NEJM198804073181402

10.2165/00002512-200118090-00004

10.1002/ana.410440712

10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06180.x

10.1023/A:1010991020245

10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00075-1

10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01688-1

10.1056/NEJM198911163212004

10.1056/NEJM199301213280305

10.1002/ana.410320614

10.1038/305137a0

10.1002/ana.410260407

10.1002/ana.410280412

Rakshi JS, 1999, Frontal, midbrain and striatal dopaminergic function in early and advanced Parkinson's disease: a 3D [18F]dopa‐PET study, Brain, 122, 1637, 10.1093/brain/122.9.1637

10.1002/ana.410340304

10.1002/ana.410340306

10.1016/0022-510X(95)00316-T

10.1093/brain/119.2.585

10.1136/jnnp.64.3.314

Brooks DJ, 2000, Relative rates of progression of early Parkinson's disease patients started on either ropinirole or L‐dopa: 2‐year and 5‐year follow‐up 18F‐dopa PET findings, Mov Disord, 5, S308

10.1007/s00702-002-0753-0

10.1056/NEJM200005183422004

10.1001/jama.284.15.1931

10.1001/jama.287.13.1653

10.1038/jcbfm.1985.87

10.1002/hbm.460020402

10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00818.x

10.1212/WNL.52.5.932

10.1002/syn.10034