Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management
Tóm tắt
To compare the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) using triangular titanium implants vs conservative management (CM) in patients with chronic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. 103 adults with chronic SIJ pain at nine sites in four European countries were randomly assigned to and underwent either minimally invasive SIJF using triangular titanium implants (N = 52) or CM (N = 51). CM was performed according to the European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pelvic girdle pain and consisted of optimization of medical therapy, individualized physical therapy (PT) and adequate information and reassurance as part of a multifactorial treatment. The primary outcome was the difference in change in self-rated low back pain (LBP) at 6 months. Additional endpoints included quality of life using EQ-5D-3L, disability using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SIJ function using active straight leg raise (ASLR) test and adverse events. NCT01741025. At 6 months, mean LBP improved by 43.3 points in the SIJF group and 5.7 points in the CM group (difference of 38.1 points, p < 0.0001). Mean ODI improved by 26 points in the SIJF group and 6 points in the CM group (p < 0.0001). ASLR, EQ-5D-3L, walking distance and satisfaction were statistically superior in the SIJF group. The frequency of adverse events did not differ between groups. One case of postoperative nerve impingement occurred in the surgical group. In patients with chronic SIJ pain, minimally invasive SIJF using triangular titanium implants was safe and more effective than CM in relieving pain, reducing disability, improving patient function and quality of life.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Erichsen J (1859) A lecture on the sacro-iliac disease. Lancet 73:25–27. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)20467-5
Goldthwait JE, Osgood RB (1905) A consideration of the pelvic articulations from an anatomical, pathological and clinical standpoint. Boston Med Surg J 152:593–601
Steindler A (1938) Differential diagnosis of pain low in the back. JAMA 110:106–113
Mixter W, Barr J (1934) Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 211:210–215
Sembrano JN, Polly DW (2009) How often is low back pain not coming from the back? Spine 34:E27–E32. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818b8882
Bernard TN, Kirkaldy-Willis WH (1987) Recognizing specific characteristics of nonspecific low back pain. Clin Orthop 217:266–280
DePalma MJ, Ketchum JM, Saullo TR (2011) Etiology of chronic low back pain in patients having undergone lumbar fusion. Pain Med 12:732–739. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01098.x
Liliang P-C, Lu K, Liang C-L et al (2011) Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: findings using dual sacroiliac joint blocks. Pain Med Malden Mass 12:565–570. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01087.x
Schofield DJ, Callander EJ, Shrestha RN et al (2015) Back problems, comorbidities, and their association with wealth. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 15:34–41. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.018
Sturesson B (2007) CHAPTER 23—Movement of the sacroiliac joint with special reference to the effect of load A2—Wilson, Andry VleemingVert MooneyRob StoeckartPhilip. In: Mov. Stab. Lumbopelvic Pain Second Ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 343–352
Vleeming A, Volkers AC, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R (1990) Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac joint. Part II: biomechanical aspects. Spine 15:133–136
Sturesson B, Selvik G, Udén A (1989) Movements of the sacroiliac joints. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine 14:162–165
Gaenslen FJ (1927) Sacro-iliac arthrodesis: indications, author’s technic and end-results. J Am Med Assoc 89:2031–2035
Smith-Petersen MN (1921) Arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint. A new method of approach. J Bone Jt Surg 3:400–405
Hagen R (1974) Pelvic girdle relaxation from an orthopaedic point of view. Acta Orthop Scand 45:550–563
Waisbrod H, Krainick JU, Gerbershagen HU (1987) Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis for chronic lower back pain. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Arch Für Orthop Unf-Chir 106:238–240
Kibsgård TJ, Røise O, Sudmann E, Stuge B (2013) Pelvic joint fusions in patients with chronic pelvic girdle pain: a 23-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 22:871–877. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2512-8
Giannikas KA, Khan AM, Karski MT, Maxwell HA (2004) Sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic pain: a simple technique avoiding the use of metalwork. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 13:253–256. doi:10.1007/s00586-003-0620-1
Buchowski JM, Kebaish KM, Sinkov V et al (2005) Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 5:520–528. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.02.022 (discussion 529)
Schütz U, Grob D (2006) Poor outcome following bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion for degenerative sacroiliac joint syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg 72:296–308
Belanger TA, Dall BE (2001) Sacroiliac arthrodesis using a posterior midline fascial splitting approach and pedicle screw instrumentation: a new technique. J Spinal Disord 14:118–124
Manfré L (2014) Percutaneous sacroiliac joint fixation in sacroiliac instability. The first case report using a fully CT-guided technique. Interv Neuroradiol J Peritherapeutic Neuroradiol Surg Proced Relat Neurosci 20:621–625
Ledonio CGT, Polly DW, Swiontkowski MF (2014) Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective? Clin Orthop 472:1831–1838. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3499-8
Ledonio C, Polly D, Swiontkowski MF, Cummings J (2014) Comparative effectiveness of open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. Med Devices Evid Res 2014:187–193. doi:10.2147/MDER.S60370
Graham Smith A, Capobianco R, Cher D et al (2013) Open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a multi-center comparison of perioperative measures and clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Innov Res 7:14. doi:10.1186/1750-1164-7-14
Fortin JD, Falco FJ (1997) The Fortin finger test: an indicator of sacroiliac pain. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ 26:477–480
Szadek KM, van der Wurff P, van Tulder MW et al (2009) Diagnostic validity of criteria for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review. J Pain 10:354–368. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.014
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2952 (discussion 2952)
Vleeming A, Albert HB, Östgaard HC et al (2008) European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 17:794–819. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0602-4
Rudolf L (2012) Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis-mis technique with titanium implants: report of the first 50 patients and outcomes. Open Orthop J 6:495–502. doi:10.2174/1874325001206010495
Mens JM, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ et al (2001) Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. Spine 26:1167–1171
EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy Amst Neth 16:199–208
König H-H, Bernert S, Angermeyer MC et al (2009) Comparison of population health status in six european countries: results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire. Med Care 47:255–261. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318184759e
Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O et al (2013) Swespine: the Swedish spine register. Eur Spine J 22:953–974. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2758-9
Core Team R (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna
Cummings J Jr, Capobianco RA (2013) Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: one-year outcomes in 18 patients. Ann Surg Innov Res 7:12. doi:10.1186/1750-1164-7-12
Sachs D (2013) Minimally Invasive versus Open Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Comparison of Process Measures and Description of Technique. In: Int. Soc. Adv. Spine Surg. Vancouver, p 187
Gaetani P, Miotti D, Risso A et al (2013) Percutaneous arthrodesis of sacro-iliac joint: a pilot study. J Neurosurg Sci 57:297–301
Vanaclocha VV, Verdú-López F, Sánchez-Pardo M et al (2014) Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint arthrodesis: experience in a prospective series with 24 patients. J Spine. doi:10.4172/2165-7939.1000185
Heiney J, Capobianco R, Cher D (2015) Systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using a lateral transarticular approach. Int J Spine Surg. doi:10.14444/2040
Lingutla KK, Pollock R, Ahuja S (2016) Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4490-8
Duhon BS, Cher DJ, Wine KD et al (2015) Triangular titanium implants for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study. Glob Spine J 6:257–269. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1562912
Polly DW, Cher DJ, Wine KD et al (2015) Randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants vs nonsurgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: 12-month outcomes. Neurosurgery 77:674–691. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988
Parker SL, Adogwa O, Mendenhall SK et al (2012) Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis. Spine J 12:1122–1128. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.006
Rudolf L, Capobianco R (2014) Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants. Open Orthop J 8:375–383. doi:10.2174/1874325001408010375
Haefeli M, Elfering A (2006) Pain assessment. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 15(Suppl 1):S17–S24. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x
Copay AG, Cher DJ (2015) Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment? Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1095-3
Parker SL, Adogwa O, Paul AR et al (2011) Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 14:598–604. doi:10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472
Cher DJ, Reckling WC, Capobianco RA (2015) Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System. Med Devices Evid Res 8:485–492. doi:10.2147/MDER.S94885
Martin BI, Mirza SK, Comstock BA et al (2007) Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine 32:382–387. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000254104.55716.46
Martin BI, Mirza SK, Flum DR et al (2012) Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 12:89–97. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.010