Single-Step BLUP with Varying Genotyping Effort in Open-Pollinated Picea glauca
Tóm tắt
Maximization of genetic gain in forest tree breeding programs is contingent on the accuracy of the predicted breeding values and precision of the estimated genetic parameters. We investigated the effect of the combined use of contemporary pedigree information and genomic relatedness estimates on the accuracy of predicted breeding values and precision of estimated genetic parameters, as well as rankings of selection candidates, using single-step genomic evaluation (HBLUP). In this study, two traits with diverse heritabilities [tree height (HT) and wood density (WD)] were assessed at various levels of family genotyping efforts (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) from a population of white spruce (Picea glauca) consisting of 1694 trees from 214 open-pollinated families, representing 43 provenances in Québec, Canada. The results revealed that HBLUP bivariate analysis is effective in reducing the known bias in heritability estimates of open-pollinated populations, as it exposes hidden relatedness, potential pedigree errors, and inbreeding. The addition of genomic information in the analysis considerably improved the accuracy in breeding value estimates by accounting for both Mendelian sampling and historical coancestry that were not captured by the contemporary pedigree alone. Increasing family genotyping efforts were associated with continuous improvement in model fit, precision of genetic parameters, and breeding value accuracy. Yet, improvements were observed even at minimal genotyping effort, indicating that even modest genotyping effort is effective in improving genetic evaluation. The combined utilization of both pedigree and genomic information may be a cost-effective approach to increase the accuracy of breeding values in forest tree breeding programs where shallow pedigrees and large testing populations are the norm.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aguilar, 2010, Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score., J. Dairy Sci., 93, 743, 10.3168/jds.2009-2730
Askew, 1994, Estimation of relationship coefficients among progeny derived from wind-pollinated orchard seeds., Theor. Appl. Genet., 88, 267, 10.1007/BF00225908
Beaulieu, 2014, Accuracy of genomic selection models in a large population of open-pollinated families in white spruce., Heredity, 113, 343, 10.1038/hdy.2014.36
Burdon, 1971, Breeding populations for recurrent selection: conflicts and possible solutions., N. Z. J. For. Sci., 1, 174
Butler, 2009, ASReml-R Reference Manual.
Calus, 2008, Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes., Genetics, 178, 553, 10.1534/genetics.107.080838
Cappa, 2016, SSRs, SNPs and DArTs comparison on estimation of relatedness and genetic parameters’ precision from a small half-sib sample population of Eucalyptus grandis., Mol. Breed., 36, 1, 10.1007/s11032-016-0522-7
Christensen, 2010, Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped., Genet. Sel. Evol., 42, 2, 10.1186/1297-9686-42-2
Christensen, 2012, Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs., Animal, 6, 1565, 10.1017/S1751731112000742
Doerksen, 2010, Impact of reconstructed pedigrees on progeny-test breeding values in red spruce., Tree Genet. Genomes, 6, 591, 10.1007/s11295-010-0274-1
Ducrocq, 2010, Combining genomic and classical information in national BLUP evaluation to reduce bias due to genomic pre-selection., Interbull Bull., 41, 33
Dutkowski, 2002, Spatial analysis methods for forest genetic trials., Can. J. For. Res., 32, 2201, 10.1139/x02-111
El-Kassaby, 2011, Breeding without breeding: is a complete pedigree necessary for efficient breeding?, PLoS One, 6, e25737, 10.1371/journal.pone.0025737
El-Kassaby, 2012, Breeding without breeding: selection using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor method (GBLUP)., New For., 43, 631, 10.1007/s11056-012-9338-4
Falconer, 1996, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Forni, 2011, Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information., Genet. Sel. Evol., 43, 1, 10.1186/1297-9686-43-1
Frentiu, 2008, Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 275, 639
El-Dien, 2016, Implementation of the realized genomic relationship matrix to open-pollinated white spruce family testing for disentangling additive from nonadditive genetic effects., G3 (Bethesda), 6, 743, 10.1534/g3.115.025957
Grattapaglia, 2011, Genomic selection in forest tree breeding., Tree Genet. Genomes, 7, 241, 10.1007/s11295-010-0328-4
Habier, 2013, Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction., Genetics, 194, 597, 10.1534/genetics.113.152207
Henderson, 1984, Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding.
Huber, 1992, The efficiency of half-sib, half-diallel and circular mating designs in the estimation of genetic parameters in forestry: a simulation., For. Sci., 38, 757
Jayawickrama, 2000, A breeding strategy for the New Zealand radiata pine breeding cooperative., Silvae Genet., 49, 82
Kalinowski, 2007, Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment., Mol. Ecol., 16, 1099, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x
Klápště, 2014, Estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values from western larch open-pollinated families using marker-based relationship., Tree Genet. Genomes, 10, 241, 10.1007/s11295-013-0673-1
Koreckỳ, 2013, Comparison of genetic parameters from marker-based relationship, sibship, and combined models in Scots pine multi-site open-pollinated tests., Tree Genet. Genomes, 9, 1227, 10.1007/s11295-013-0630-z
Legarra, 2009, A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information., J. Dairy Sci., 92, 4656, 10.3168/jds.2009-2061
Liu, 2014, Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs., Genet. Sel. Evol., 46, 8, 10.1186/1297-9686-46-8
Meuwissen, 2011, The unified approach to the use of genomic and pedigree information in genomic evaluations revisited., J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 128, 429, 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00966.x
Misztal, 2009, Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information., J. Dairy Sci., 92, 4648, 10.3168/jds.2009-2064
Namkoong, 2012, Tree Breeding: Principles and Strategies.
Ødegård, 2012, Estimation of heritability from limited family data using genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing., Genet. Sel. Evol., 44, 16, 10.1186/1297-9686-44-16
Oliehoek, 2006, Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs., Genetics, 173, 483, 10.1534/genetics.105.049940
Pavy, 2013, Development of high-density SNP genotyping arrays for white spruce (Picea glauca) and transferability to subtropical and nordic congeners., Mol. Ecol. Resour., 13, 324, 10.1111/1755-0998.12062
Porth, 2013, Populus trichocarpa cell wall chemistry and ultrastructure trait variation, genetic control and genetic correlations., New Phytol., 197, 777, 10.1111/nph.12014
Powell, 2010, Reconciling the analysis of IBD and IBS in complex trait studies., Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 800, 10.1038/nrg2865
Rigault, 2011, A white spruce gene catalog for conifer genome analyses., Plant Physiol., 157, 14, 10.1104/pp.111.179663
Ritland, 1996, Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients., Genet. Res., 67, 175, 10.1017/S0016672300033620
Squillace, 1974, Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees., Silvae Genet., 23, 149
VanRaden, 2008, Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions., J. Dairy Sci., 91, 4414, 10.3168/jds.2007-0980
Visscher, 2006, Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings., PLoS Genet., 2, e41, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020041
Vitezica, 2011, Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection., Genet. Res., 93, 357, 10.1017/S001667231100022X