Simulation of gap junction formation reveals critical role of Cys disulfide redox state in connexin hemichannel docking

Harris AL. Connexin channel permeability to cytoplasmic molecules. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 200794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.03.011. Kotini M, et al. Gap junction protein Connexin-43 is a direct transcriptional regulator of N-cadherin in vivo. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3846. Martin PE, Kwak BR. An overview of the focus of the international gap junction conference 2017 and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:2823. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092823. Valiunas V, Cohen IS, Brink PR. Defining the factors that affect solute permeation of gap junction channels. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018;1860:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.07.002. Ambrosi C, et al. Analysis of trafficking, stability and function of human Connexin 26 gap junction channels with deafness-causing mutations in the fourth transmembrane helix. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70916. Ambrosi C, et al. Connexin43 forms supramolecular complexes through non-overlapping binding sites for drebrin, tubulin, and ZO-1. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157073. Bargiello TA, et al. Gating of Connexin Channels by transjunctional-voltage: Conformations and models of open and closed states. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018;1860:22–39. Batir Y, Bargiello TA, Dowd TL. Structural studies of N-terminal mutants of Connexin 26 and Connexin 32 using 1H NMR spectroscopy. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2016;608:8–19. Bennett BC, et al. An electrostatic mechanism for Ca 2+ -mediated regulation of gap junction channels. Nat Commun. 2016;7:1–12. Bevans CG, Harris AL. Regulation of connexin channels by pH: Direct action of the protonated form of taurine and other aminosulfonates. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:3711–9. Beyer EC, Lipkind GM, Kyle JW, Berthoud VM. Structural organization of intercellular channels II. Amino terminal domain of the connexins: Sequence, functional roles, and structure. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2012;1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.10.011. Chen VC, Gouw JW, Naus CC & Foster LJ. Connexin multi-site phosphorylation: Mass spectrometry-based proteomics fills the gap. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2013;1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.02.028. EkVitorín JF, Pontifex TK, Burt JM. Determinants of Cx43 Channel Gating and Permeation: The Amino Terminus. Biophys J. 2016;110:127–40. Fernández-Olivares A, et al. Extracellular cysteines are critical to form functional Cx46 hemichannels. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:7252. Flores CE, et al. Trafficking of gap junction channels at a vertebrate electrical synapse in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E573-82. Gaietta G, et al. Multicolor and electron microscopic imaging of connexin trafficking. Science (80- ). 2002;296:503–7. Lopez W, et al. Mechanism of gating by calcium in connexin hemichannels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E7986–95. Moreno AP. Connexin phosphorylation as a regulatory event linked to channel gating. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2005;1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2005.02.016. Myers JB, et al. Structure of native lens connexin 46/50 intercellular channels by cryo-EM. Nature. 2018;564:372–7. Oh S, Bargiello TA. Voltage regulation of connexin channel conductance. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56:1–5. Raškevičius V, et al. Molecular basis for potentiation of Cx36 gap junction channel conductance by n-alcohols and general anesthetics. Biosci Rep. 2018;38:BSR20171323. Oshima A. Structure and closure of connexin gap junction channels. FEBS Letters. 2014;588:1230–7. Pogoda K, Kameritsch P, Retamal MA & Vega JL. Regulation of gap junction channels and hemichannels by phosphorylation and redox changes: A revision. BMC Cell Biol. 2016;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-016-0099-3. Sánchez A, Castro C, Flores DL, Gutiérrez E & Baldi P. Gap junction channels of innexins and connexins: Relations and computational perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20 . https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102476. Stout RF, Spray DC. Cysteine residues in the cytoplasmic carboxy terminus of connexins dictate gap junction plaque stability. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:2757–64. Su V, Lau AF. Connexins: Mechanisms regulating protein levels and intercellular communication. FEBS Letters. 2014;588:1212–20. Unwin PNT, Ennis PD. Calcium-mediated changes in gap junction structure: Evidence from the low angle x-ray pattern. J Cell Biol. 1983;97:1459–66. Verselis VK, Trelles MP, Rubinos C, Bargiello TA, Srinivas M. Loop gating of connexin hemichannels involves movement of pore-lining residues in the first extracellular loop domain. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:4484–93. Thévenin AF. et al. Proteins and mechanisms regulating gap-junction assembly, internalization, and degradation. Physiol. 2013;28. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00038.2012. Unger VM, Kumar NM, Gilula NB, Yeager M. Three-dimensional structure of a recombinant gap junction membrane channel. Science (80- ). 1999;283:1176–80. Beyer EC & Berthoud VM. Gap junction structure: Unraveled, but not fully revealed. F1000Res. 2017;6. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10490.1. Dahl G, Levine E, Rabadan-Diehl C, Werner R. Cell/cell channel formation involves disulfide exchange. Eur J Biochem. 1991;197:141–4. Dahl G, Werner R, Levine E, Rabadan-Diehl C. Mutational analysis of gap junction formation. Biophys J. 1992;62:172–82. Dupont E, El Aoumari A, Briand JP, Fromaget C, Gross D. Cross-linking of cardiac gap junction connexons by thiol/disulfide exchanges. J Membr Biol. 1989;108:247–52. Foote CI, Zhou L, Zhu X, Nicholson BJ. The pattern of disulfide linkages in the extracellular loop regions of connexin 32 suggests a model for the docking interface of gap junctions. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:1187–97. John SA, Revel JP. Connexon integrity is maintained by non-covalent bonds: intramolecular disulfide bonds link the extracellular domains in rat connexin-43. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;178:1312–8. Rahman S, Howard Evans W. Topography of connexin32 in rat liver gap junctions: Evidence for an intramolecular disulphide linkage connecting the two extracellular peptide loops. J Cell Sci. 1991;100:567–78. García I E, Sánchez HA, Martínez AD & Retamal MA. Redox-mediated regulation of connexin proteins; focus on nitric oxide. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018;1860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.10.006. Retamal MA, et al. Extracellular cysteine in connexins: Role as redox sensors. Front Physiol. 2016;7:1. Aasen T, Johnstone S, Vidal-Brime L, Lynn KS & Koval M. Connexins: Synthesis, post-translational modifications, and trafficking in health and disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051296. Bai D, Yue B, Aoyama H. Crucial motifs and residues in the extracellular loops influence the formation and specificity of connexin docking. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.07.003. Beyer EC, Berthoud VM. The family of connexin genes. Connexins: A Guide 3–26 (Humana Press Inc., 2009). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-59745-489-6_1#citeas. Delvaeye T, Vandenabeele P, Bultynck G, Leybaert L & Krysko DV. Therapeutic Targeting of Connexin Channels: New Views and Challenges. Trends Mol Med. 2018;24 1036–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2018.10.005. Denoyelle F et al. Connexin 26 gene linked to a dominant deafness [9]. Nature. 1998;393. https://doi.org/10.1038/30639. Beyer EC, Ebihara L & Berthoud VM. Connexin mutants and cataracts. Front Pharmacol. 2013;4 APR. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00043. Laird DW, Lampe PD. Therapeutic strategies targeting connexins. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:905–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2018.138. Leybaert L, et al. Connexins in cardiovascular and neurovascular health and disease: Pharmacological implications. Pharmacol Rev. 2017;69:396–478. Nagy JI, Pereda AE & Rash JE. Electrical synapses in mammalian CNS: Past eras, present focus and future directions. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018;1860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.05.019. Nielsen MS, et al. Gap junctions. Compr Physiol. 2012;2:1981–2035. Hoorelbeke D, et al. Cx43 channels and signaling via IP3/Ca2+, ATP, and ROS/NO propagate radiation-induced DNA damage to non-irradiated brain microvascular endothelial cells. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:194. Xiao S, et al. Auxiliary trafficking subunit GJA1–20k protects connexin-43 from degradation and limits ventricular arrhythmias. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:4858–70. Willecke K. et al. Structural and functional diversity of connexin genes in the mouse and human genome. Biolo Chemi. 2002;383. https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2002.076 Winterhager E. Gap junctions in development and disease. Gap Junctions in Development and Disease. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28621-7. Vincze R, et al. Connexin 43 differentially regulates epileptiform activity in models of convulsive and non-convulsive epilepsies. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:173. Szabó Z, et al. Extensive astrocyte synchronization advances neuronal coupling in slow wave activity in vivo. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6018. Kutova OM, Pospelov AD, Balalaeva IV. The Multifaceted Role of Connexins in Tumor Microenvironment Initiation and Maintenance. Biology (Basel). 2023;12:204. Sirnes S, et al. DNA methylation analyses of the connexin gene family reveal silencing of GJC1 (Connexin45) by promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. Epigenetics. 2011;6:602–9. Tishchenko A, et al. Cx43 and associated cell signaling pathways regulate tunneling nanotubes in breast cancer cells. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:2798. Simon Á, Magyar C, Héja L, Kardos J. Peptide Binding Sites of Connexin Proteins. Chemistry (Easton). 2020;2:662–73. Kékesi O, Ioja EEE, Szabó Z, Kardos J, Héja L. Recurrent seizure-like events are associated with coupled astroglial synchronization. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:215. Steinhäuser C et al. Astrocyte dysfunction in epilepsy. Jasper’s Basic Mechanisms of the Epilepsies. 2012;63:261–281 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787636. Hirrlinger J, Nimmerjahn A. A perspective on astrocyte regulation of neural circuit function and animal behavior. Glia. 2022;70:1554–80. Jourdeuil K, Taneyhill LA. The gap junction protein connexin 43 controls multiple aspects of cranial neural crest cell development. J Cell Sci. 2020;133:jcs235440. Kunduri G, et al. Defective cortex glia plasma membrane structure underlies light-induced epilepsy in cpes mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E8919–28. Walrave L, Vinken M, Leybaert L & Smolders I. Astrocytic connexin43 channels as candidate targets in epilepsy treatment. Biomolecules2020;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111578. Lee HJ, et al. Cryo-EM structure of human Cx31.3/GJC3 connexin hemichannel. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba4996. Qi C, et al. Structure of the connexin-43 gap junction channel in a putative closed state. Elife. 2023;12:RP87616. Lee HJ, et al. Conformational changes in the human Cx43/GJA1 gap junction channel visualized using cryo-EM. Nat Commun. 2023;14:931. Héja L, Simon Á, Szabó Z, Kardos J. Connexons coupling to gap junction channel: Potential role for extracellular protein stabilization centers. Biomolecules. 2022;12:49. Abkevich VI, Shakhnovich EI. What can disulfide bonds tell us about protein energetics, function and folding: Simulations and bioninformatics analysis. J Mol Biol. 2000;300:975–85. Appenzeller-Herzog C & Riemer J. CHAPTER 1.2. Techniques to Monitor Disulfide Bond Formation and the Reduction Potential of Cysteine–Cystine Couples In vitro and In vivo . in. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788013253-00034. Sun M. an, et al. Prediction of reversible disulfide based on features from local structural signatures. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:279. Wiedemann C, Kumar A, Lang A & Ohlenschläger O. Cysteines and Disulfide Bonds as Structure-Forming Units: Insights From Different Domains of Life and the Potential for Characterization by NMR. Front Chem.2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00280. Østergaard H, Henriksen A, Hansen FG, Winther JR. Shedding light on disulfide bond formation: Engineering a redox switch in green fluorescent protein. EMBO J. 2001;20:5853–62. Karimi M, et al. Reactivity of disulfide bonds is markedly affected by structure and environment: Implications for protein modification and stability. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38572. Bao X, Chen Y, Reuss L, Altenberg GA. Functional Expression in Xenopus Oocytes of Gap-junctional Hemichannels Formed by a Cysteine-less Connexin 43. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:9689–92. Stelzl LS, Fowler PW, Sansom MSP, Beckstein O. Flexible gates generate occluded intermediates in the transport cycle of LacY. J Mol Biol. 2014;426:735–51. Smart OS, Neduvelil JG, Wang X, Wallace BA, Sansom MSP. HOLE: A program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J Mol Graph. 1996;14:354–60. Khan AK, et al. A Steric, “Ball-and-Chain” Mechanism for pH-Mediated Regulation of Gap Junction Channels. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107482. Miyazawa A, Fujiyoshi Y, Unwin N. Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore. Nature. 2003;423:949–55. Weber PA, Chang HC, Spaeth KE, Nitsche JM, Nicholson BJ. The permeability of gap junction channels to probes of different size is dependent on connexin composition and permeant-pore affinities. Biophys J. 2004;87:958–73. Keßler M, Wittig I, Ackermann J, Koch I. Prediction and analysis of redox-sensitive cysteines using machine learning and statistical methods. Biol Chem. 2021;402:925–35. Garrido Ruiz D, Sandoval-Perez A, Rangarajan AV, Gunderson EL, Jacobson MP. Cysteine Oxidation in Proteins: Structure, Biophysics, and Simulation. Biochemistry. 2022;61:2165–76. Wensien M, et al. A lysine–cysteine redox switch with an NOS bridge regulates enzyme function. Nature. 2021;593:460–4. Rabe von Pappenheim F, et al. Widespread occurrence of covalent lysine–cysteine redox switches in proteins. Nat Chem Biol. 2022;18:368–75. Mazmanian K, Sargsyan K, Grauffel C, Dudev T, Lim C. Preferred Hydrogen-Bonding Partners of Cysteine: Implications for Regulating Cys Functions. J Phys Chem B. 2016;120:10288–96. Fra A, Yoboue ED, Sitia R. Cysteines as redox molecular switches and targets of disease. Front. Mol Neurosci. 2017;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2017.00167. Held JM. Redox Systems Biology: Harnessing the Sentinels of the Cysteine Redoxome. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2020;32. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2019.7725. Groitl B, Jakob U. Thiol-based redox switches. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteomics. 2014;1844.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.03.007. Careri G, Fasella P, Gratton E, Jencks WP. Statistical time events in enzymes: a physical assessment. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1975;3:141–64. Levin L, et al. A Single Disulfide Bond Disruption in the β3 Integrin Subunit Promotes Thiol/Disulfide Exchange, a Molecular Dynamics Study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59175. Nakagawa S, et al. Asparagine 175 of connexin32 is a critical residue for docking and forming functional heterotypic gap junction channels with connexin26. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:19672–81. Gong XQ, Nakagawa S, Tsukihara T, Bai D. A mechanism of gap junction docking revealed by functional rescue of a human-disease-linked connexin mutant. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:3113–20. Jassim A, Aoyama H, Ye WG, Chen H, Bai D. Engineered Cx40 variants increased docking and function of heterotypic Cx40/Cx43 gap junction channels. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;90:11–20. Luscombe NM, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. Amino acid-base interactions: A three-dimensional analysis of protein-DNA interactions at an atomic level. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:2860. Flores JA, et al. Connexin-46/50 in a dynamic lipid environment resolved by CryoEM at 1.9 Å. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4331. Totland MZ, Rasmussen NL, Knudsen LM, Leithe E. Regulation of gap junction intercellular communication by connexin ubiquitination: physiological and pathophysiological implications. Cell Mol Life Sci.2020; 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03285-0. Lampe PD, Lau AF. The effects of connexin phosphorylation on gap junctional communication. Int J Biochemi Cell Biol. 2004;36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1357-2725(03)00264-4. Liang WG, et al. Human Connexin30.2/31.3 (GJC3) does not Form Functional Gap Junction Channels but Causes Enhanced ATP Release in HeLa Cells. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2011;61:189–97. Krishnan S, et al. Design of reversible, cysteine-targeted michael acceptors guided by kinetic and computational analysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:12624–30. Shindo N, et al. Selective and reversible modification of kinase cysteines with chlorofluoroacetamides. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15:250–8. Sõrmus T, et al. Construction of Covalent Bisubstrate Inhibitor of Protein Kinase Reacting with Cysteine Residue at Substrate-Binding Site. J Med Chem. 2022;65:10975–91. Karaj E, et al. Tunable Cysteine-Targeting Electrophilic Heteroaromatic Warheads Induce Ferroptosis. J Med Chem. 2022;65:11788–817. Sanderson K. Irreversible kinase inhibitors gain traction. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4103. Hösli L, et al. Decoupling astrocytes in adult mice impairs synaptic plasticity and spatial learning. Cell Rep. 2022;38:110484. Zhao Z, Ukidve A, Kim J, Mitragotri S. Targeting Strategies for Tissue-Specific Drug Delivery. Cell. 2020;181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.001. Lomize MA, Pogozheva ID, Joo H, Mosberg HI, Lomize AL. OPM database and PPM web server: Resources for positioning of proteins in membranes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D370–6. Bowers KJ. et al. Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters. in Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, SC’06 43–43 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/sc.2006.54. Maeda S, et al. Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 Å resolution. Nature. 2009;458:597–602. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996;14:33–8. Dosztányi Z, Fiser A, Simon I. Stabilization centers in proteins: Identification, characterization and predictions. J Mol Biol. 1997;272:597–612. Magyar C, Gromiha MM, Pujadas G, Tusnády GE, Simon I. SRide: A server for identifying stabilizing residues in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res.2005;33:597–612.