Should we use simultaneous equations to modeldecision-making? A methodological note

Paul Anand

Tóm tắt

This paper argues for a careful consideration of the methodological underpinnings ofpositive decision theory. Two state-of-the-art papers published in Econometrica, whichsupport a variety of often contradictory conclusions about the empirical validity of theexpected utility model, are used to motivate a discussion of what models might be for, andtherefore what criteria should be used to determine their acceptance or rejection. It issuggested that progress in positive decision theory would be advanced if greater attentionwere given to causal structures and that this may, in turn, merit the use of simultaneousequation techniques.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

M. Allais, Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque, critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école américaine, Econometrica 21(1953)503 – 546.

R. Cubitt and R. Sugden, The selection of preferences through imitation, Discussion Paper, University of East Anglia, 1996.

G. Gigerenzer and U. Hoffrage, How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats, Psychological Review 102(1995)684 – 704.

I. Gilboa and D. Smeidler, Case-based decision theory, Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(1995)605 – 639.

D.W. Harless and C.F. Camerer, The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories, Econometrica 62(1994)1251 – 1289.

J.D. Hey and C. Orme, Investigating generalisations of expected utility theory using experimental data, Econometrica 62(1994)1291 – 1326.

S. Humphreys, Reflections on the future of decision theory, Discussion Paper, Nottingham, 1996.

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory, Econometrica 47(1997)263 – 291.

M. J. Machina, Paper presented at the 1st Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory Conference, Oslo, June, 1982.

D. Papineau, The Philosophy of Science, OUP, 1995.

K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, 1959.