Short-term and long-term interest rate spread’s dynamics to risk and the yield curve

SN Business & Economics - Tập 2 - Trang 1-19 - 2022
Haydory Akbar Ahmed1, M. Wasiqur Rahman Khan2
1Department of Accounting, Economics, and Finance, Bill Munday School of Business, St. Edward’s University, Austin, USA
2Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Brac University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Tóm tắt

The yield curve is perceived to be an indicator of the future state of the economy. For example, an inverted yield curve is considered to be a signal of a forthcoming economic slowdown. Does risk explain the slope of the yield curve as well? In this paper, we explore the dynamics of short-term and long-term interest rate spread to changes in risk and government debt using time-series data. Government-issued bonds are perceived to be risk-free assets. Financial intermediaries consider government-issued securities as a secondary reserve, and they are also used during open market operations. We explore the dynamics while controlling for a potential long-run common trend between the interest rate spread and government debt. We employ the bounds test for cointegration in an auto-regressive distributed lag model and evaluate impulse responses to develop insights into the dynamics. The ARDL bounds test finds evidence of cointegration between the measures interest rate spreads and government debt. A shock to government-issued bonds indicates that the short-term spread decreases, whereas the long-term spread rises by a small margin. We conjecture an upward sloping yield curve resulting from a shock to government debt. A shock to the financial market risk index indicates that the short-term spread decreases for a brief period before returning to its pre-shock level, whereas the long-term spread more or less remains unchanged. We conjecture a downward sloping yield curve resulting from a shock to risk. This conjecture on the impact of risk on short-term and long-term interest rate spreads make the prediction about the inverted yield curve based on the expectation hypothesis and the segmented market theory somewhat weak.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bernanke B (1990) On the predictive power of interest rates and interest rate spreads. Technical Report National Bureau of Economic Research Brandl MW (2020) Money, banking, financial markets and institutions, 1st edn. Cengage Learning Breusch TS (1978) Testing for autocorrelation in dynamic linear models. Australian Econ Papers 17(31):334–355 Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for auto-regressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431 Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica J Econ Soc 1057–1072 Dotsey M (1998) The predictive content of the interest rate term spread for future economic growth. FRB Richmond Econ Q 84:31–51 Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica J Econometric Soc 251–276 Eo Y, Kang KH (2020) The effects of conventional and unconventional monetary policy on forecasting the yield curve. J Econ Dyn Control 111:103812 Estrella A (2005) Why does the yield curve predict output and inflation? Econ J 115:722–744 Evans P (1987) Interest rates and expected future budget deficits in the united states. J Polit Econ 95:34–58 Evgenidis A, Papadamou S, Siriopoulos C (2020) The yield spread’s ability to forecast economic activity: What have we learned after 30 years of studies? J Bus Res 106:221–232 Godfrey LG (1978) Testing against general autoregressive and moving average error models when the regressors include lagged dependent variables. Econometrica J Econometric Soc 1293–1301 Harvey CR (1988) The real term structure and consumption growth. J Finance Econ 22:305–333 Jordan S, Philips AQ (2018) Dynamic simulation and testing for single-equation cointegrating and stationary autoregressive distributed lag models. R J 10(2) Lee J, Strazicich MC (2003) Minimum lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Rev Econ Stat 85:1082–1089 Mishkin FS (2014) Economics of money, banking and financial markets volume, 11th edn. Pearson, New York Perron P (1997) Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. J Economet 80:355–385 Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relation- ships. J Appl Economet 16:289–326 Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346 Sarno L, Thornton DL (2003) The dynamic relationship between the federal funds rate and the treasury bill rate: an empirical investigation. J Bank Finance 27:1079–1110 Simon DP (1990) Expectations and the treasury bill-federal funds rate spread over recent monetary policy regimes. J Finance 45:567–577 Svensson LE (1997) Inflation forecast targeting: Implementing and monitoring inflation targets. Eur Econ Rev 41:1111–1146 Taylor JB (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. In: Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy. Elsevier vol 39. pp 195–214 Tillmann P (2020) Monetary policy uncertainty and the response of the yield curve to policy shocks. J Money Credit Bank 52:803–833 Wheelock DC, Wohar ME et al (2009) Can the term spread predict output growth and recessions? A survey of the literature. Fed Reserve Bank St Louis Rev 91:419–440 Zivot E, Andrews DWK (2002) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 20:25–44