Sharing decisions amid uncertainties: a qualitative interview study of healthcare professionals’ ethical challenges and norms regarding decision-making in gender-affirming medical care

BMC Medical Ethics - Tập 23 - Trang 1-17 - 2022
Karl Gerritse1,2,3, Casper Martens1, Marijke A. Bremmer2,3, Baudewijntje P. C. Kreukels2,4, Fijgje de Boer1, Bert C. Molewijk1
1Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities (ELH), Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria (CEGD), Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC (location VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

In gender-affirming medical care (GAMC), ethical challenges in decision-making are ubiquitous. These challenges are becoming more pressing due to exponentially increasing referrals, politico-legal contestation, and divergent normative views regarding decisional roles and models. Little is known, however, about what ethical challenges related to decision-making healthcare professionals (HCPs) themselves face in their daily work in GAMC and how these relate to, for example, the subjective nature of Gender Incongruence (GI), the multidisciplinary character of GAMC and the role HCPs play in assessing GI and eligibility for interventions. Given the relevance and urgency of these questions, we conducted a qualitative study among HCPs providing GAMC to transgender adults in the Netherlands. In this qualitative research, we conducted 11 semi-structured interviews between May 2020 and February 2021 with HCPs (six mental health professionals, two HCPs in endocrinology, two in plastic surgery, and one in nursing) working in two distinct GAMC settings. We purposively sampled for professional background and years of experience in GAMC. We analyzed our interview data using thematic analysis. As some respondents were more inclined to speak about what should or ought to be done to arrive at good or right decision-making, we identified both ethical challenges and norms. Furthermore, in our analysis, we differentiated between respondents’ explicit and implicit ethical challenges and norms and ascertained the specific context in which these challenges emerged. Respondents’ ethical challenges and norms centered on (1) dividing and defining decisional roles and bounds, (2) negotiating decision-making in a (multidisciplinary) team, and (3) navigating various decision-making temporalities. These themes arose in the context of uncertainties regarding (1) GAMC’s guidelines, evidence, and outcomes, as well as (2) the boundaries and assessment of GI. This interview study provides detailed empirical insight into both the explicit and implicit ethical challenges that HCPs experience and their ethical norms regarding decision-making. It also describes how uncertainties and (implicit) normativities concerning GAMC and GI pre-structure the moral environment in which these challenges and norms manifest. We provide normative reflections and recommendations on handling these ethical challenges in a way that is sensitive to the context in which they arise.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arcelus J, Bouman WP, Van Den Noortgate W, Claes L, Witcomb G, Fernandez-Aranda F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies in transsexualism. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30:807–15. Coleman E, Bockting W, Botzer M, Cohen-Kettenis P, DeCuypere G, Feldman J, et al. Standards of Care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. Int J Transgenderism. 2012;13:165–232. Hembree WC, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gooren L, Hannema SE, Meyer WJ, Murad MH, et al. Endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:3869–903. Gerritse K, Hartman LA, Antonides M-F, Wensing-Kruger A, de Vries ALC, Molewijk BC. Moral challenges in transgender care: a thematic analysis based on a focused ethnography. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47:2319–33. Gerritse K, Hartman LA, Bremmer MA, Kreukels BPC, Molewijk AC. Decision-making approaches in transgender healthcare: conceptual analysis and ethical implications. Med Health Care Philos. 2021;1:1–13. Hartman L, Widdershoven G, de Vries A, Wensing-Kruger A, den Heijer M, Steensma T, et al. Integrative clinical ethics support in gender affirmative care: lessons learned. HEC Forum. 2019;31:241–60. Vrouenraets LJJJ, Hartman LA, Hein IM, de Vries ALC, de Vries MC, Molewijk AC. Dealing with moral challenges in treatment of transgender children and adolescents: evaluating the tole of moral case deliberation. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49:2619–34. Molewijk AC, Hem MH, Pedersen R. Dealing with ethical challenges: a focus group study with professionals in mental health care. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16:4. Hem MH, Molewijk AC, Pedersen R. Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion: a focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:1–9. Richards C, Bouman WP, Seal L, Barker MJ, Nieder T, T’sjoen G. Non-binary or genderqueer genders. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28:95–102. Fielding J, Bass C. Individuals seeking gender reassignment: marked increase in demand for services. BJPsych Bull. 2018;42:206–10. Wiepjes CM, Nota NM, de Blok CJM, Klaver M, de Vries ALC, Wensing-Kruger SA, et al. The Amsterdam cohort of Gender Dysphoria study (1972–2015): trends in prevalence, treatment, and regrets. J Sex Med. 2018;15:582–90. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edition. 2013. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 11th Revision. 2018. Beek TF, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Kreukels BPC. Gender incongruence/gender dysphoria and its classification history. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28:5–12. Shuster SM. Trans medicine: the emergence and practice of treating gender. 1st ed. New York: NYU Press; 2021. Coleman E, Radix AE, Bouman WP, Brown GR, de Vries ALC, Deutsch MB, et al. Standards of care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people version 8. Int J Transgender Health. 2022;23(sup 1):S1–259. Dewey JM. Challenges of implementing collaborative models of decision making with trans-identified patients. Health Expect. 2015;18:1508–18. Cavanaugh T, Hopwood R, Lambert C. Informed consent in the medical care of transgender and gender-nonconforming patients. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18:1147–55. Schulz SL. The informed consent model of transgender care: an alternative to the diagnosis of Gender Dysphoria. J Humanist Psychol. 2018;58:72–92. Turban JL, Kraschel KL, Cohen IG. Legislation to criminalize gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth. JAMA. 2021;325:2251–2. Cass H. Independent review into gender identity services for children and young people: interim report. 2022. https://cass.independent-review.uk/publications/. Boyd I, Hackett T, Bewley S. Care of Transgender Patients: a general practice quality improvement approach. Healthc (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;10:121. Butler G, Adu-Gyamfi K, Clarkson K, El Khairi R, Kleczewski S, Roberts A, et al. Discharge outcome analysis of 1089 transgender young people referred to paediatric endocrine clinics in England 2008–2021. Arch Dis Child. 2022;107:1018–22. Giordano S. Sliding doors: should treatment of gender identity disorder and other body modifications be privately funded? Med Health Care Philos. 2012;1:31–40. Swann S, Herbert S. Ethical issues in the mental health treatment of gender dysphoric adolescents. Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2008;10:37–41. Tishelman AC, Kaufman R, Edwards-Leeper L, Mandel FH, Shumer DE, Spack NP. Serving transgender youth: challenges, dilemmas, and clinical examples. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2015;46:37–45. Vrouenraets LJJJ, Fredriks AM, Hannema SE, Cohen-Kettenis PT, De Vries MC. Early medical treatment of children and adolescents with Gender Dysphoria: an empirical ethical study. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57:367–73. Chen D, Simons L. Ethical considerations in fertility preservation for transgender youth: a case illustration. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2018;6:93–100. MacKinnon KR, Ashley F, Kia H, Lam JSH, Krakowsky Y, Ross LE. Preventing transition “regret”: an institutional ethnography of gender-affirming medical care assessment practices in Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2021;291: 114477. MacKinnon KR, Grace D, Ng SL, Sicchia SR, Ross LE. “I don’t think they thought I was ready”: How pre-transition assessments create care inequities for trans people with complex mental health in Canada. Int J Ment Health. 2020;49:56–80. Clark BA, Virani A, Marshall SK, Saewyc EM. Conditions for shared decision making in the care of transgender youth in Canada. Health Promot Int. 2021;36:570–80. Eyssel J, Koehler A, Dekker A, Sehner S, Nieder TO. Needs and concerns of transgender individuals regarding interdisciplinary transgender healthcare: a non-clinical online survey. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:1–26. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 4th ed. London, UK.: SAGE; 2018. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. Schofield G, Dittborn M, Selman LE, Huxtable R. Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: a rapid review. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22:1–17. Molewijk AC, Stiggelbout AM, Otten W, Dupuis HM, Kievit J. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: a Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics Research. Health Care Anal. 2003;11:69–92. Korstjens I, Moser A. European Journal of General Practice Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24:120–4. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Thompson R. Shared decision making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, de Haes HCJM. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1172–9. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:2221–6. Prentice TM, Gillam L. Can the ethical best practice of shared decision-making lead to moral distress? J Bioeth Inq. 2018;15:259–68. Walker P. Dialogic consensus as the moral philosophical basis for shared decision-making. Linacre Q. 2019;86:168. McQueen P. The role of regret in medical decision-making. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2017;20:1051–65. McQueen P. Choosing to be changed: revelation, integrity and the ethics of self-transformation. Ethical Perspect. 2017;24:545–68. Cribb A. Managing ethical uncertainty: implicit normativity and the sociology of ethics. Sociol Health Illn. 2020;42:21–34. Berger Z. Navigating the unknown: shared decision-making in the face of uncertainty. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:675. Medendorp NM, Stiggelbout AM, Aalfs CM, Han PKJ, Smets EMA, Hillen MA. A scoping review of practice recommendations for clinicians’ communication of uncertainty. Health Expect. 2021;24:1025–43. Mabel H, Altinay M, Ferrando CA. The role of the ethicist in an interdisciplinary transgender health care team. Transgender Heal. 2019;4:136–42. Hartman L, Metselaar S, Molewijk AC, Edelbroek H, Widdershoven GAM. Developing an ethics support tool for dealing with dilemmas around client autonomy based on moral case deliberations. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19:97. van Schaik MV, Pasman HR, Widdershoven G, Metselaar S. Participatory development of CURA, a clinical ethics support instrument for palliative care. BMC Med Ethics. 2022;23:32. Wylie K, Knudson G, Khan SI, Bonierbale M, Watanyusakul S, Baral S. Serving transgender people: clinical care considerations and service delivery models in transgender health. Lancet. 2016;388:401–11. Widdershoven G, Abma T, Molewijk B. Empirical ethics as dialogical practice. Bioethics. 2009;23:236–48.