Sex estimation using orbital measurements in the Croatian population
Tóm tắt
The aim of this study was to test the sexual dimorphism of orbital measurements in the Croatian population using multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) images. We have retrospectively taken 414 head CT scans of adults from Croatian clinical hospitals in Split and Zagreb (214 males and 200 females) with slice thickness < 1 mm and no pathological or traumatic changes that could affect the measurements. DICOM files were imported into Stratovan Checkpoint Software and viewed in 2D and 3D using semi-transparent 3D volume rendering. Eight standard measurements were calculated based on twelve orbital landmarks (six paired). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to explore sexual and regional differences, and linear discriminant analysis was used to develop sex classification models. The PCA showed separation based on sex and region, and additional analysis demonstrated that females and males in Split and Zagreb differed in four orbital measurements (P ≤ 0.001). Only those measurements that did not show regional differences were further analyzed, and all showed statistically significant sexual dimorphism. The accuracy of univariate functions for sex estimation ranged from 53.43 to 71.88%, and for multivariate function, the accuracy was 73.45%. The orbital measurements of the Croatian population showed restricted forensic significance for sex classification. On the other hand, we have shown that they can have a potential for exploring the inter- and intra-population differences.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Buchner A. The identification of human remains. Int Dent J. 1985;35:307–11.
Bidmos MA, Gibbon VE, Štrkalj G. Recent advances in sex identification of human skeletal remains in South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 2010;106:1–6.
DiGangi EA, Moore MK. Research methods in human skeletal biology. Academic Press. 2012.
Bašić Ž, Kružić I, Jerković I, Anelinović D, Anđelinović Š. Sex estimation standards for medieval and contemporary Croats. Croat Med J. 2017;58:222–30.
Jerković I, Bašić Ž, Kružić I, Anđelinović Š. Sex determination from femora in late antique sample from Eastern Adriatic coast (Salona necropolis). Anthropol Rev. 2016;79:59–67.
Byers S. Forensic anthropology. Boston: A text book. Allyng & Bacon; 2002.
Bass WM. Missouri Archaeological Society. Hum Osteol a Lab F manual 5th ed Columbia Missouri Archaeol Soc. 2005.
Pickering RB, Bachman D. The use of forensic anthropology. CRC Press. 2009.
Spradley MK. Metric methods for the biological profile in forensic anthropology: sex, ancestry, and stature. Acad forensic Pathol. 2016;6:391–9.
Petaros A, Caplova Z, Verna E, Adalian P, Baccino E, de Boer HH, et al. Technical Note: The Forensic Anthropology Society of Europe (FASE) Map of Identified Osteological Collections. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;328: 110995.
Adel R, Ahmed HM, Hassan OA, Abdelgawad EA. Assessment of craniometric sexual dimorphism using multidetector computed tomographic imaging in a sample of Egyptian population. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2019;40:19–26.
Attia A, Ghoneim M, Elkhamary SM. Sex discrimination from orbital aperture by using computed tomography: sample of Egyptian population. Mansoura J Forensic Med Clin Toxicol. 2019;27:1–12.
Botwe BO, Sule DS, Ismael AM. Radiologic evaluation of orbital index among Ghanaians using CT scan. J Physiol Anthropol. 2017;36:29.
Kaya A, Uygun S, Eraslan C, Akar GC, Kocak A, Aktas E, et al. Sex estimation: 3D CTA-scan based on orbital measurements in Turkish population. Rom J Leg Med. 2014;22:257–62.
Bedalov A, Bašić Ž, Marelja I, Dolić K, Bukarica K, Missoni S, et al. Sex estimation of the sternum by automatic image processing of multi-slice computed tomography images in a Croatian population sample: a retrospective study. Croat Med J. 2019;60:237–45.
Verhoff MA, Ramsthaler F, Krähahn J, Deml U, Gille RJ, Grabherr S, et al. Digital forensic osteology—possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy® project. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;174:152–6.
Šlaus M, Strinović D, Skavić J, Petrovečki V. Discriminant function sexing of fragmentary and complete femora: standards for contemporary Croatia. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48:509–12.
Šlaus M, Bedić Ž, Strinović D, Petrovečki V. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the tibia for contemporary Croats. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;226:302.e1-302.e4.
Bubalo P, Baković M, Tkalčić M, Petrovečki V, Mayer D. Acetabular osteometric standards for sex estimation in contemporary Croatian population. Croat Med J. 2019;60:221–6.
Stratovan Corporation. Stratovan Checkpoint [Software]. Version 2018.08.07. Aug 07, 2018. URL: https://www.stratovan.com/products/checkpoint [Internet]. Available from: https://www.stratovan.com/products/checkpoint.
Adams DC, Otárola-Castillo E. geomorph: an <scp>r</scp> package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2013;4:393–9.
Spradley MK, Jantz RL. Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:289–96.
Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A. Estimation of sex from cranial measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229:158.e1-158.e8.
Bašić Ž, Fox AR, Anterić I, Jerković I, Polašek O, Anđelinović Š, et al. Cultural inter-population differences do not reflect biological distances: an example of interdisciplinary analysis of populations from Eastern Adriatic coast. Croat Med J. 2015;56:230–8.
Sparks CS, Jantz RL. A reassessment of human cranial plasticity: Boas revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:14636–9.
Dayal MR, Spocter MA, Bidmos MA. An assessment of sex using the skull of black South Africans by discriminant function analysis. Homo. 2008;59:209–21.
Husmann PR, Samson DR. In the eye of the beholder: sex and race estimation using the human orbital aperture. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:1424–9.
Jerković I, Bašić Ž, Bareša T, Krešić E, Adamić Hadžić A, Dolić K, et al. The repeatability of standard cranial measurements on dry bones and MSCT images. J Forensic Sci. 2022; 67(5): 1938–47