Sex Differences in Foreign Language Text Comprehension: The Role of Interests and Prior Knowledge
Tóm tắt
The scores obtained by female students on the national foreign language examinations in the Netherlands have been slightly but consistently lower than those of male students. The present research among 2980 high school students tested the hypothesis that, owing to sex differences in prior knowledge and interests, the topic of a text is an important factor explaining these sex‐based differences. To measure prior knowledge, the students' reading and TV habits, academic subject choice, self‐reported knowledge, and interest concerning the text topics were assessed. A total of 11 different English reading passages—including 5 texts with a “male” topic, and 6 texts with a “female” topic—were selected. On all the male reading comprehension measures, and on five of the six female tests, significant differences were found in the expected direction. Moreover, these sex‐based differences appeared to be largely due to sex differences in reading habits. Although there was only an indirect relation between the students' reading preference and the text comprehension score on related topics, this study suggests that differences between the sexes in prior knowledge contribute to sex differences in foreign language reading comprehension.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Afflerbach P., 1986, The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers’ main idea construction processes.
Alderson J. C., 1984, Reading in a foreign language, 1
Anderson R. C., 1984, Handbook of reading research., 255
Asher S. R., 1980, Theoretical issues in reading comprehension, 525
Bernhardt E. B., 1991, A psycholinguistic perspective on second language literacy, AILA Review, 8, 31
Bossers B., 1991, On thresholds, ceilings and short‐circuits: the relation between L1 reading, L2 reading and L2 knowledge, AILA Review, 8, 45
Bransford J. D., 1984, Heading in a Foreign Language., 28
Bügel K., 1993, Sekseverschillen in tekstbegrip bij moderne vreemde talen. [Sex differences in foreign language reading comprehension].
Bügel K., 1991, Item‐specifieke verschillen in de prestaties van jongens en meisjes bij tekstbegripexamens moderne vreemde talen. [Sex‐based differences in item responses in foreign language examinations)], Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 16, 337
Central bureau voor de statistiek, 1993, Statistiek van het voortgezet onderwijs 1991/'92. Schalen, leerlingen en examens. [Statistics on secondary education 1991–1992. Schools, students and examinations]., 31
Claessen J. F. M., 1975, De keuze van moderne vreemde talen in examenpakketten van avo‐leerlingen. [Foreign language options in secondary education].
Collins A., 1980, Theoretical issues in reading comprehension., 385
Doolittle A., 1989, Gender differences in performance on a college‐level achievement test
Eccles J. E., 1983, Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches, 75
Entin E. B., 1985, Advances in reading/language research, 9
Gipps C., 1994, A fair test? Assessment, achievement and equity?
Green D. R.(1987).Sex differences in item performance on a standardized achievement battery.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association New York.
Hartog H., 1977, Niveauvergelijking examens tekstbegrip moderne vreemde talen VWO en HAVO. [Comparison of difficulty levels in foreign language examinations in secondary education].
Intomart Research Institute, 1987, Nationaal onderzoek jongerenbladen 1987 [National survey of magazines for the youth].
Lawrence I. M., 1988, Differential item functioning for males and females on SAT‐verbal reading subscore items, 10.1002/j.2330-8516.1988.tb00266.x
McCall C.(1989).Gender and Reading Assessment.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the College Reading Association Philadelphia.
Peretz A. S., 1990, Testing reading comprehension in LSP: Does topic familiarity affect assessed difficulty and actual performance?, Reading in a Foreign Language, 7, 447
Rosser P., 1987, Sex bias in college admissions tests: Why women lose out.
Rumelhart D. E., 1980, Theoretical issues in reading comprehension, 33
Scheuneman J. D.&Gerritz K.(1990).Effect of technical content on gender differences in reading passages.Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association Boston.
Segalowitz N., 1991, Lower level components of reading skill in higher level bilinguals: implications for reading instruction, AILA Review, 8, 15
Sikkema P., 1988, Jeugd nu. [Youth today].
Tan S. H., 1990, Individualizing the assessment of language abilities, 214
United States Commission on Civil Rights, 1993, The validity of testing in education and employment.
Wilder G. Z., 1989, Sex differences in test performance: A survey of the literature
Wilson M., 1991, Girls and young women in education. A European perspective.