Selectivity in Mammalian Extinction Risk and Threat Types: a New Measure of Phylogenetic Signal Strength in Binary Traits

Conservation Biology - Tập 24 Số 4 - Trang 1042-1051 - 2010
Susanne A. Fritz1, Andy Purvis1
1Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom

Tóm tắt

Abstract:  The strength of phylogenetic signal in extinction risk can give insight into the mechanisms behind species’ declines. Nevertheless, no existing measure of phylogenetic pattern in a binary trait, such as extinction‐risk status, measures signal strength in a way that can be compared among data sets. We developed a new measure for phylogenetic signal of binary traits, D, which simulations show gives robust results with data sets of more than 50 species, even when the proportion of threatened species is low. We applied D to the red‐list status of British birds and the world's mammals and found that the threat status for both groups exhibited moderately strong phylogenetic clumping. We also tested the hypothesis that the phylogenetic pattern of species threatened by harvesting will be more strongly clumped than for those species threatened by either habitat loss or invasive species because the life‐history traits mediating the effects of harvesting show strong evolutionary pattern. For mammals, our results supported our hypothesis; there was significant but weaker phylogenetic signal in the risk caused by the other two drivers (habitat loss and invasive species). We conclude that D is likely to be a useful measure of the strength of phylogenetic pattern in many binary traits.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1098/rspb.1997.0057

10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00015.x

10.1111/j.1469-1795.2005.00013.x

10.1038/nature05634

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96022.x

10.1073/pnas.0510541103

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x

10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00448.x

10.1073/pnas.0801917105

10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.016

10.1086/284325

10.1098/rstb.2005.1669

10.1086/343873

10.1098/rspb.2008.0905

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01307.x

Gregory R. D., 2002, The population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man: an analysis of conservation concern 2002–2007, British Birds, 95, 410

10.1093/bioinformatics/btm538

10.2307/2992321

10.1098/rspb.2004.2724

IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature).2008.2008 IUCN red list of threatened species.IUCN Cambridge United Kingdom . Available fromhttp://www.iucnredlist.org(accessed November 2008).

Ives A. R., 2009, Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables, Systematic Biology, 58, 9

10.1073/pnas.0406718102

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98155.x

10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01152.x

10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025635

Mace G., 2005, The millennium ecosystem assessment. current status and trends: ecosystems and human well‐being, 77

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.495

10.1086/419657

Orme C. D. L. R. P.Freckleton andG. H.Thomas.2009.CAIC. Comparative analyses using independent contrasts. R package version 1.0.4. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna. Available fromhttp://r‐forge.r‐project.org/projects/caic(accessed February 2009).

10.1073/pnas.200223397

10.1038/44766

10.1098/rspb.2007.0505

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00333.x

10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-063008-102010

10.1126/science.288.5464.328

R Development Core Team.2008.R: a language and environment for statistical computing.R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna . Available from:http://www.R‐project.org(accessed October 2008).

10.1126/science.1173073

10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96332.x

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00241.x

10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01393.x

10.1038/nature04389

10.1126/science.1103538

10.1098/rspb.2008.0549

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150448

10.1073/pnas.0806446105