Selective use of animation and feedback in computer-based instruction

Ok-choon Park1, Stuart S. Gittelman2
1the U. S. Army Research Institute (ARI) in Alexandria, Virginia,
2George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia#TAB#

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (1985).Computer-based instruction: Method and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Baek, Y. K., & Layne, B. H. (1988). Color, graphics, and animation in a computer-assisted learning tutorial lesson.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15(4), 131–135.

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213–238.

Brown, J. S., & Bell, A. (1982). SOPHIE: A sophisticated instructional environment for teaching electronic troubleshooting: An example of A.I. in C.A.I. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.),Intelligent tutoring systems. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977).Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research interactions. New York: Irvington.

diSessa, A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledge-based learning.Cognitive Science, 6, 37–75.

Freeman, F. N. (1924).Visual education: A comparative study of motion pictures and other methods of instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (1983).Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Grant, L., McAvoy, R., & Keenan, J. B. (1982). Prompting and feedback variables in concept programming.Teaching of Psychology, 9, 173–177.

Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Weitzman, L. (1984, Summer). STEAMER: An interactive inspectable simulation-based training system.AI Magazine.

Kaiser, M. I. K., Proffitt, D. R., & Anderson, K. (1985). Judgements of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 795–803.

Kieras, D. E., & Bovair, S. (1984). The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device.Cognitive Science, 8, 255–273.

Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction.Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 211–232.

Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude.Educational Psychology Review, 1, 279–308.

Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning.Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79–97.

Lesgold, A.M., Lajoie, S. P., Bunzo, M., & Eggan, G. (1989). Sherlock: A coached practice environment for an electronics troubleshooting job. In J. Larkin, R. Chabay, & C. Scheftic (Eds.),Computer assisted instruction and intelligent tutoring systems: Establishing communication and collaboration. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Levin, J., Anglin, G., & Carney, R. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. Willows & D. Houghton (Eds.),The psychology of illustration: Vol. 2. Instructional issues (pp. 51–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Levin, J., & Lesgold, A. (1978). On pictures in prose.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 26, 233–243.

Norman, D. (1982). Learning and memory. San Francisco: Freeman.

Park, O., & Hopkins, R. (In press). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays.Instructional Science.

Peters, H. J., & Daiker, K. C. (1982). Graphics and animation as instructional tools: A case study.Pipeline, 7, 11–13, 57.

Reed, S. K. (1985). Effects of computer graphics on improving estimates to algebra word problems.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 285–298.

Reif, F. (1987). Instructional design, cognition, and technology: Applications to the teaching of scientific concepts.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 309–324.

Rieber, L. P. (1989). The effects of computer animated elaboration strategies and practice on factual and application learning in an elementary science lesson.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 431–444.

Rieber, L. P. (1990a). Animation in computer-based instruction.Educational Technology Research & Development, 38(1), 77–86.

Rieber, L. P. (1990b). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 135–140.

Rieber, L. P. (1991). Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 318–328.

Rieber, L. P., Boyce, M. J., & Assad, C. (1990). The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 46–52.

Rieber, L. P., & Hannafin, M. J. (1988). Effects of textual and animated orienting activities and practice on learning from computer-based instruction.Computers in the Schools, 5(1/2), 77–89.

Rigney, J. W., & Lutz, K. A. (1976). Effects of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitude.Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 305–311.

Schimmel, B. J. (1983).A meta-analysis of feedback to learners in computerized and programmed instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 233 708).

Towne, D., Munroe, A., Pizzini, Q., & Surmon, D. (1987). Simulation composition tools with integrated semantics.Abstracts of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, 54.

White, B. Y. (1984). Designing computer games to help physics students understand Newton's laws of motion.Cognition and Instruction, 1, 69–108.

White, B. Y., & Frederisen, J. R. (1990). Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments.Artificial Intelligence, 42, 99–157.

Woolf, B., Blegan, D., Jansen, J., & Verloop, A. (1986). Teching a complex industrial process. Philadelphia, PA: National Association of Artificial Intelligence.