Seeing Red Over Green: Contesting Urban Sustainabilities in China

Urban Studies - Tập 50 Số 11 - Trang 2256-2274 - 2013
Choon‐Piew Pow, Harvey Neo

Tóm tắt

The urban sustainability agenda is engaged at some levels with the two concepts of ecological modernisation and urban entrepreneurialism. While they share certain important commonalities (for example, the emphasis on what is normatively understood as ‘right’ policy-making), each has largely progressed on its own intellectual trajectory. It is suggested that the concepts of ecological modernisation and urban entrepreneurialism are crystallised and concretised in the idea(l) form of the ‘eco-city’ through the search for an ‘urban sustainability fix’ in urban China. Although the idea of constructing an ‘eco-city’ has been mooted since the 1980s, the concept remains somewhat elusive and controversial for a number of reasons. First, while its physical form and design appeal have often been promoted by urban planners, architects and government officials, the deeper normative tenets of building an eco-city are surprisingly ignored. Secondly, the lack of an ‘actually existing’ or successfully implemented eco-city project suggests the considerable amount of resistance and difficulties (in terms of planning, politics, economic costs, etc.) that the concept encounters in practice. To that end, the paper examines various green urban initiatives in reform China before focusing on the example of Shanghai’s Dongtan eco-city project (an entrepreneurial urban prestige-project jointly developed by the British and Chinese governments) to examine the challenges and contradictions of an urban sustainability fix in the guise of eco-city building in China.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/016224399702200101

10.1504/IJEP.1998.002231

Brenhouse H., 2010, International Herald Tribune

10.1002/9781444397499

10.1080/09644019608414283

Florida R., 2002, The Rise of the Creative Class

10.1080/07293682.1996.9657714

Fox J. (2009) Dongtan, China’s flagship ecocity project, R.I.P. (www.treehugger.com/files/2009/01/dongtan-ecocity-modern-shangri-la.php).

10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00322.x

Guo Y. H., 2004, Zhouxiang lushe wenming

Guy S., 2001, Journal of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 19, 131

Harvey D., 1996, Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference

10.1177/0739456X9901800305

Heim K. (2007) Can a bold new ‘eco-city’ clear the air in China? The Seattle Times (seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2004033679_chinagreen.html; accessed 1 May 2009).

Huber J., 1985, Die Regenbogen-Gesellschaft: Ökologie und Sozialpolitik

10.1191/1474474006eu354oa

Jonas A. E. G., 2007, The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the US and Europe

Kahn J., Yardley J. (2007) As China roars, pollution reaches deadly extremes, New York Times (www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/world/asia/26china.html?ei=5070&en=8b938dde909f8e69&ex=1190260800&pagewanted=all).

10.1080/135498303200041313

10.1080/13504509909470000

Krueger R., 2007, The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe

10.1080/13604810802168117

10.1002/9781444343434

McGray D., 2007, Wired Magazine, 15

10.1080/09644010701419105

Moore M., 2008, National Post

10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00039-1

10.1080/08941920802438618

Ng G., 2010, The Straits Times

10.1163/15685310260188736

10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00193-2

10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00003-6

10.1080/0042098975394

10.1111/j.1467-9906.2011.00577.x

Shen M. (2011) A critical analysis of environmental governance in urban China: a case study of Nanjing. Unpublished MA thesis, National University of Singapore.

10.2148/benv.29.3.210.54281

10.1080/13549839908725588

10.1177/0956247806063978

10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00535.x

10.1080/0042098032000106555

Wu F., 2007, Urban Development in Post-reform China: State, Market and Space