Nhận thức của giáo viên trung học về tầm quan trọng của các phương pháp sư phạm hỗ trợ sự tham gia của học sinh về hành vi, cảm xúc và nhận thức

The Australian Educational Researcher - Tập 50 Số 4 - Trang 1025-1047 - 2023
Megan L. Kelly1, Tony Yeigh1, Suzanne Hudson1, Royce Willis1, Megan Lee2
1Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Australia
2Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia

Tóm tắt

Tóm tắt

Bài viết này báo cáo nghiên cứu gốc điều tra vai trò then chốt mà giáo viên đóng trong việc thu hút học sinh, sử dụng một khung lý thuyết ba chiều. Khung lý thuyết này xác định cách các lựa chọn sư phạm của giáo viên ảnh hưởng đến sự tham gia của học sinh theo cách tác động đến các hành vi bên ngoài, cảm xúc nội tâm và nhận thức nội tại của học sinh. Một bảng câu hỏi đã được phát triển để khám phá nhận thức của giáo viên trung học (n = 223) về các phương pháp giảng dạy hỗ trợ sự tham gia về hành vi, cảm xúc và nhận thức của học sinh trong lớp học. Kết quả cho thấy rằng những người nữ tham gia đặt tầm quan trọng cao hơn vào các phương pháp giảng dạy hỗ trợ sự tham gia về nhận thức và hành vi của học sinh, và những người tham gia có vai trò lãnh đạo đặt tầm quan trọng cao hơn vào các phương pháp giảng dạy hỗ trợ sự tham gia về nhận thức và cảm xúc của học sinh. Cũng từ nghiên cứu này xuất hiện một mối tương quan tiêu cực giữa tầm quan trọng mà giáo viên đặt vào các phương pháp sư phạm hỗ trợ sự tham gia về nhận thức và hành vi và giá trị ICSEA của trường học của họ (thước đo lợi thế giáo dục xã hội trong các trường học ở Úc). Nhìn chung, kết quả hỗ trợ khung lý thuyết ba chiều của sự tham gia học sinh được sử dụng trong nghiên cứu này và cung cấp một khung lý thuyết mạnh mẽ cho nghiên cứu trong tương lai nhằm khám phá sâu hơn các lựa chọn sư phạm của giáo viên và cách mà những lựa chọn này ảnh hưởng đến sự tham gia của học sinh.

Từ khóa

#giáo viên trung học #sư phạm #tham gia của học sinh #hành vi #cảm xúc #nhận thức #ICSEA #lợi thế giáo dục xã hội #khung lý thuyết ba chiều

Tài liệu tham khảo

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2015). What does the ICSEA value mean? https://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/About_icsea_2014.pdf

Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2017). Media release. https://www.acara.edu.au/docs/default-source/Media-Releases/20170308-my-school-2017-media-release.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Berry, A. (2020). Disrupting to driving: Exploring upper primary teachers’ perspectives on student engagement. Teachers & Teaching, 26(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1757421

Bingham, G. E., & Okagaki, L. (2012). Ethnicity and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 65–95). Springer.

Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation. (2017). Improving high school engagement, classroom practices and achievement. Learning Curve, 18, 1–19. https://www.cese.nsw.gov.au//images/stories/PDF/2017_engagement_NAPLAN_AA_DN_v4.pdf

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., & Ginns, P. (2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.002

Commissioner for Children and Young People (CCYP) (2018). Speaking out about school and learning: The views of WA children and young people on factors that support their engagement in school and learning. Commissioner for Children and Young People Western Australia. https://www.ccyp.wa.gov.au/media/2763/speaking-out-about-school-and-learning.pdf

Cothran, D. J. & Ennis, C. D. (2000). Building bridges to student engagement: Communicating respect and care for students in urban high schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33(4), 106–117. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-07241-004

Department of Education and Training. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/662684_tgta_accessible_final_0.pdf

Department for Education and Child Development. (2016). Student engagement matrix guidelines. Government of South Australia. https://www.education.sa.gov.au/department/research-and-data/wellbeing-engagement-collection

Eccles, J. S. (2016). Engagement: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 43, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.003

Engels, M. C., Split, J., Denies, K., & Verschueren, K. (2021). The role of affective teacher-student relationships in adolescents’ school engagement and achievement trajectories. Learning and Instruction, 75, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101485

Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Fredricks, J. A., et al. (2019). What matters for urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Adolescent Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558419830638

Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M., Linn, J. S., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009

Fried, L., & Chapman, E. (2012). An investigation into the capacity of student motivation and emotion regulation pedagogies to predict engagement and resilience in the middle school classroom. The Australian Educational Researcher, 39, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-011-0049-1

Gonski, D., Arcus, T., Boston, K., Gould, V., Johnson, W., O’Brien, L., Perry, L. & Roberts, M. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Australian Government Department of Education, Skills and Employment. https://www.dese.gov.au/uncategorised/resources/through-growth-achievement-report-review-achieve-educational-excellence-australian-schools

Goss, P., Sonnemann, J., & Griffiths, K. (2017). Engaging students: Creating classrooms that improve learning. Grattan Institute. https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Engaging-students-creating-classrooms-that-improve-learning.pdf

Goldspink, C., Winter, P. & Foster, M. (2008). Student engagement and quality pedagogy. https://www.education.sa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net691/f/student_engagement_and_quality_pedagogy.pdf?v=1457314100

Grimm, P. (2010). Social Desirability Bias. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057

Harris, L. R. (2008). A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216875

Harris, L. (2011). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of student engagement: Engagement in learning or in schooling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.006

Hospel, V., & Garland, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy and structure equally important for student’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001

Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693

Johnson, D. R., & Creech, J. C. (1983). Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models: A simulation study of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 48(3), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095231

Jonasson, C. (2012). Teachers and students’ divergent perceptions of student engagement: Recognition of school and workplace goals. British Journal of Sociology and Education, 33(5), 723–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2012.674811

Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273. https://www.academia.edu/download/66642261/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x20210423-19932-18lf4su.pdf

Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, A. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891

Queensland Department of Education. (2001). The Queensland school reform longitudinal study. The State of Queensland (Department of Education). https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/24998065

Melbourne Graduate School of Education (n.d.). Think like a kid: Engaging teachers to engage students. https://education.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/file/0004/2540335/think_like_a_kid.pdf

Moreira, P., Cunha, D., & Inman, R. A. (2020). An integration of multiple student engagement dimensions into a single measure and validity-based studies. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(5), 564–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282919870973

MySchool. (2020). Guide to understanding the Index of Community Socioeducational Advantage (ICSEA). https://www.myschool.edu.au/media/1820/guide-to-understanding-icsea-values.pdf

National Research Council & Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. National Academy Press.

Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). Teachers College Press.

Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

Pedler, M., Yeigh, T. & Hudson, S. (2020). The teachers’ role in student engagement: A review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 48–62. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.4

Ravet, J. (2007). Making sense of disengagement in the primary classroom: A study of pupil, teacher and parent perceptions. Research Papers in Education, 22(3), 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701497589

Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.999920

Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer.

Ross, J. A. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of teacher efficacy. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (pp. 49–73). JAI Press.

Rubie-Davies, C. M., Flint, A., & McDonald, L. G. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs, teacher characteristics, and school contextual factors: What are the relationships? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02025.x

Sarfo, J. O., & Adusei, H. (2015). Is “one-teacher-to-all-subjects” enough? Ghana’s public primary school system on a slippery slope. Journal of Advocacy, Research & Education, 3, 146–155. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280937360_Is_One-Teacher-To-AllSubjects_Enough_Ghana's_Public_Primary_School_System_on_a_Slippery_Slope

Seelman, K. L., Forge, N., Walls, N. E., & Bridges, N. (2015). School engagement among LGBTQ high school students: The roles of safe adults and gay–straight alliance characteristics. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.021

Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., & Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.003

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behaviour and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571

Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer.

Sullivan, A. M., Johnson, B., Owens, L., & Conway, R. (2014). Punish them or engage them? Teachers’ views of unproductive student behaviours in the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n6.6

Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

Taylor, L. & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 3–32. https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/745

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Van Uden, J. M., Ritzen, H., & Pieters, J. M. (2013). I think I can engage my students. Teachers’ perceptions of student engagement and their beliefs about being a teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.004

Wang, M., & Eccles, J. (2011). Adolescent behavioural, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x

Watson, S., Miller, T., Davis, L., & Carter, P. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the effective teacher. Research in the Schools, 17(2), 11–22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ942906

Whitney, S. D., Asigbee, F. M., Jones, S., & Schulte, K. (2020). Student self-reported motivation and teacher-rated engagement as predictors of mathematics achievement by sex and SES in a U.S. sample. Australian Educational Researcher, 47, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00351-1

Yeigh, T. (2020). Managing with mindfulness: Connecting with students in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press.

Zepke, N., Leach, L., & Butler, P. (2014). Student engagement: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(2), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.832160

Zumbo, B. D., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1993). Is the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement? Canadian Psychology, 34(4), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078865

Zyngier, D. (2007). Listening to teachers – listening to students: Substantive conversations about resistance, empowerment and engagement. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701391903