Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors

Journal of Research in Science Teaching - Tập 48 Số 10 - Trang 1159-1176 - 2011
Shawn M. Glynn1, Peggy Brickman2, Norris Armstrong3, Gita Taasoobshirazi4
1Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology, Department of Mathematics and Science Education, 329 Aderhold, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
2Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
3Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
4Department of Educational Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada

Tóm tắt

Abstract

From the perspective of social cognitive theory, the motivation of students to learn science in college courses was examined. The students—367 science majors and 313 nonscience majors—responded to the Science Motivation Questionnaire II, which assessed five motivation components: intrinsic motivation, self‐determination, self‐efficacy, career motivation, and grade motivation. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses provided evidence of questionnaire construct validity. The motivation components, especially self‐efficacy, were related to the students' college science grade point averages. The science majors scored higher than the nonscience majors on all of the motivation components. Among both science majors and nonscience majors, men had higher self‐efficacy than women, and women had higher self‐determination than men. The findings suggest that the questionnaire is a valid and efficient tool for assessing components of students' motivation to learn science in college courses, and that the components play a role in students' science achievement. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 48: 1159–1176, 2011

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Association of Colleges and Universities. (2011).Science and health. Retrieved June 6 2011 fromhttp://www.aacu.org/resources/sciencehealth/index.cfm.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, 1999, Standards for educational and psychological testing

Arbuckle J. L., 2006, Amos 7.0 user's guide

Bandura A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory

10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bandura A., 2006, The rise of applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers, 53

10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87

10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3

10.1002/sce.20413

Bradburn N. M., 2004, Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design—For market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires

10.1002/tea.20249

Byrne B. M., 2001, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming

Cassady J. C.(2001).Self‐reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation 7. Retrieved June 6 2011 fromhttp://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=12.

10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18000.x

10.1037/11546-000

10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

DeVellis R. F., 2003, Scale development: Theory and applications

Druger M., 2006, Handbook of college science teaching, 37

10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70

10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

10.1037/10519-153

10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272

Glynn S. M., 2006, Handbook of college science teaching, 25

10.1002/tea.20181

10.1002/tea.20267

Humphreys D., 2005, What really matters in college: How students view and value liberal education, Liberal Education, 91, 36

Kline R. B., 2005, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling

Koballa T. R., 2007, Handbook for research in science education, 75

Krajcik J. S., 2006, The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences

Kuh G. D., 2005, Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic, and market demands, 148

10.1002/tea.20172

10.1002/tea.1015

10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00092-4

Liu X., 2010, Using and developing measurement instruments in science education: A Rasch modeling approach

10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<275::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2

Marsden J.(2006).Gender gap in majors persists. Yale Daily News. Retrieved June 6 2011 fromhttp://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2006/apr/27/gender‐gap‐in‐majors‐persists/.

Mazlo J., 2002, Assessment of motivational methods in the general chemistry laboratory, Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 318

National Science Board, 2008, Science and engineering indicators 2008, National Scienc

National Science Foundation, 2002, Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering 2002

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007).Assessing scientific reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Retrieved June 6 2011 fromhttp://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/35/37464175.pdf.

Osterlind S. J., 2006, Modern measurement: Theory, principles, and applications of mental appraisal

2001 Ablex Publishing London F. Pajares D. H. Schunk R. Riding S. Rayner Self‐beliefs and school success: Self‐efficacy self‐ concept and school achievementBT self‐perception 239 266

10.4135/9781412984898

10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667

10.1007/s11162-004-1597-2

10.4324/9781410610904

Schunk D. H., 2008, Motivation in education

Slater T. F., 2006, Handbook of college science teaching, 25

SPSS, Inc, 2008, SPSS Base 17.0 user's guide

Stine D. D., 2009, The U.S. science and technology workforce

Tabachnick B. G., 2000, Using multivariate statistics

10.1037/a0014557

10.1002/tea.20301

Toppo G. DeBarros A. (2007).Women feed the jump in college enrollment.USA Today. Retrieved June 6 2011 fromhttp://www.navytimes.com/careers/college/military_women_college_070910/.

Wilson M., 2005, Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach

Xie Y., 2003, Women in science: Career processes and outcomes

10.3102/0002831207312909

Zusman M., 2005, Gender differences in reactions to college course requirements or “why females are better students, College Student Journal, 39, 621