Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Antaki C., 1988, Analysing everyday explanation
Billig M., 1987, Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach fo social psychology
Brewer W., 1991, Cognition and the symbolic processes
Chi M., Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science
Damon W., 1990, Development perspectives on teaching and learning thinking skills. Contributions to human development
Duckworth E., 1990, Science education: A minds‐on approach for the elementary years
Easley J., 1990, Science education: A minds‐on approach for the elementary years
Eichinger D. Anderson C. Palincsar A. &David A.(1991).An illustration of the roles of content knowledge scientific argument and social norms in collaborative problem solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association.
Einstein A., 1954, Ideas and opinions
Heyes C., 1989, Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience
Hilton D. J., 1988, Contemporary science and natural explanation
Keil F., 1984, Mechanisms of cognitive development
Kuhn D., 1988, Child development today and tomorrow
Kuhn D., 1990, Developmental perspectives on teaching and learning thinking skills. Contributions to human development
Kuhn D., 1992, Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook
Kuhn D., 1988, The development of scientific thinking skills
Kuhn D. Schauble L. &Garcia‐Mila M.(in press). Cross‐domain development of scientific reasoning.Cognition and Instruction.
Munby H., 1982, What is scientific thinking?
Parvanno C. quoted in Elder J. (1990 January 7). Hands on. New York Times (supplement).
Rogoff B., 1990, Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context, 10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001
Vosniadou S. &Brewer W.(in press). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood.Cognitive Psychology.
West L., 1985, Cognitive structure and conceptual change
Westrum R., 1989, Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience