Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bannon, L. J. & Bodker, S. (1987). Beyond the interface: Encountering artifacts in use. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought: Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction (pp. 227-253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
Cohen, D. K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus que ca change. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27-84). Berkeley: McCutchan.
Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 121-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Collins, A. & Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1-18). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S. & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Golan, R., Kyza, E. A., Reiser, B. J. & Edelson, D. C. (2001, March). Structuring the task of behavioral analysis with software scaffolds. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
Hogan, K. & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 74-107). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Hollan, J. D., Bederson, B. B. & Helfman, J. (1997). Information visualization. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 33-48). Essex, England: Elsevier Science.
Hollan, J. D., Hutchins, E. & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 174-196.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutchins, E., Hollan, J. D. & Norman, D. A. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces. In D. A. Norman & S. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design: New perspectives in human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Inc.
Jackson, S. L., Krajcik, J. & Soloway, E. (1998). The design of guided learning-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. In C.M. Karat, A. Lund, J. Coutaz, & J. Karat (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI 98: Human factors in computing systems (pp. 187-194). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Jimenenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B. & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757 -792.
Kemp, E. K., Tzou, C. T., Reiser, B. J. & Spillane, J. P. (2002). Managing dilemmas in inquiry science teaching. In P. Bell, R. Stevens, & T. Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex: The Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (pp. 206-213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koedinger, K. R. & Anderson, J. R. (1993). Reifying implicit planning in geometry: Guidelines for model-based intelligent tutoring system design. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 15-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kolodner, J. L., Owensby, J. N. & Guzdial, M. (2004). Case-based learning aids. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 829-862). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Kuhn, D., Amsel, E. & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Kyza, E. A., Golan, R., Reiser, B. J. & Edelson, D. C. (2002). Reflective inquiry: Enabling group self-regulation in inquiry-based science using the progress portfolio tool. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative Learning: Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 227-236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D. L. & Gurtner, J. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 75-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Linn, M. C., Bell, B. & Davis, E. A. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Loh, B. (2003). Using articulation and inscription as catalysts for reflection: Design principles for reflective inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Loh, B., Reiser, B. J., Radinsky, J., Edelson, D. C., Gomez, L. M. & Marshall, S. (2001). Developing reflective inquiry practices: A case study of software, the teacher, and students. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 279-323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Norman, D. A. (1988). Psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Norman, D. A. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 17-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Olson, S. & Loucks-Horsley, S. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Pea, R. D. (1992). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Perkins, D. (1998). What is understanding? In M. S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice (pp. 39-58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Quintana, C., Eng, J., Carra, A., Wu, H.K. & Soloway, E. (1999). Symphony: A case study in extending learner-centered design through process space analysis. In M. G. Williams, M. W. Altom, K. Ehrlich, & W. Newman (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI 99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 473-480). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F. & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263-305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sandoval, W. A. (1998). Inquire to explain: Structuring inquiry around explanation construction in a technology-supported biology curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Smith, B. K. & Reiser, B. J. (1998). National Geographic unplugged: Designing interactive nature films for classrooms. In C.M. Karat, A. Lund, J. Coutaz, & J. Karat (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI 98 (pp. 424-431). New York: ACM Press.
Tabak, I. (2002). Teacher as monitor, mentor or partner: Uncovering participant structures involved in supporting student-directed inquiry. In P. Bell, R. Stevens, & T. Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex: The Proceedings of the fifth international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) (pp. 466-472). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Tabak, I. & Reiser, B. J. (1997). Complementary roles of software-based scaffolding and teacher-student interactions in inquiry learning. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning '97 (pp. 289-298). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Tabak, I., Smith, B. K., Sandoval, W. A. & Reiser, B. J. (1996). Combining general and domain-specific strategic support for biological inquiry. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Third international conference, ITS '96 (pp. 288-296). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Springer-Verlag.
Teasley, S. D. & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Tzou, C. T., Reiser, B. J., Spillane, J. P. & Kemp, E. K. (2002). Characterizing the multiple dimensions of teachers' inquiry practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webb, N. M. & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.