Salience of social security contributions and employment

International Tax and Public Finance - Tập 22 - Trang 741-759 - 2014
Iñigo Iturbe-Ormaetxe1
1Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain

Tóm tắt

Social security contributions in most countries are split between employers and employees. According to standard incidence analysis, social security contributions affect employment negatively, but it is irrelevant how they are divided between employers and employees. This paper considers the possibility that (i) workers perceive a linkage between current contributions and future benefits, and (ii) they value employer’s contributions less than own contributions, as the former are less “salient.” Under these assumptions, I find that employers’ contributions have a stronger (negative) effect on employment than employees’ contributions. Furthermore, a change in how contributions are divided, which reduces the share of employers, is beneficial for employment. Finally, making employers’ contributions more visible to workers also has a positive effect on employment.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A., & Tabellini, G. (2001). Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens. Economic Policy, 16(32), 7–50. Buchanan, J., & Wagner, R. (1977). Democracy in deficit. New York: Academic Press. Cabral, M. & Hoxby C. (2012). The hated property tax: salience, tax rates, and tax revolts, NBER Working Paper 18514. Chetty, R. (2009). The simple economics of salience and taxation, NBER Working Papers No. 15246. Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1145–1177. Domínguez, I., Devesa, E., Devesa, M., Encinas, B., Meneu, R., & Nagore, A. (2011). Encuesta para determinar el impacto de las reformas necesarias del sistema de pensiones español. In Necesitan los futuros jubilados españoles complementar su pensión? Análisis de las reformas necesarias y sus efectos sobre la decisión de los ciudadanos (Part III). Fundación Edad y Vida. http://www.edad-vida.org/fitxers/publicacions/Necesitan%20Jubilados.pdf Dušek, L. (2002). Visibility of Taxes and the Size of Government, Working Paper. Feldstein, M., & Liebman, J. B. (2002). Social security. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. IV, pp. 2245–2324). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Finkelstein, A. (2009). E-Z tax: Tax salience and tax rates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 969–1010. Fullerton, D., & Metcalf, G. (2002). Tax incidence. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. IV, pp. 1787–1872). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Goldin, J., & Homonoff, T. (2013). Smoke gets in your eyes: Cigarette tax salience and regressivity. American Economic Journal, 5(1), 302–306. Goldin, J. (2013). Optimal tax salience. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Gruber, J. (1997). The incidence of payroll taxation: Evidence from Chile. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(3), s72–s101. Hamermesh, D. S. (1993). Labour demand elasticity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Koskela, E., & Schöb, R. (1999). Does the composition of wage and payroll taxes matter under nash bargaining? Economics Letters, 64, 343–349. Lindbeck, A., Molander, P., Persson, T., Petersson, O., Sandmo, A., Swedenborg, B., et al. (1994). Turning Sweden around. Cambridge: MIT Press. Mastrobuoni, G. (2011). The role of information for retirement behavior: Evidence based on the stepwise introduction of the social security statement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 913–925. Mortensen, D. T., & Pissarides, C. A. (1994). Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Review of Economic Studies, 61, 397–415. Mulligan, C., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1999). Gerontocracy, Retirement, and Social Security, NBER Working Papers No. 7117. Mulligan, C., Gil, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2010). Social security and democracy. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 10(1), 1–44. Pissarides, C. (1998). The impact of employment tax cuts on unemployment and wages: The role of unemployment benefits and tax structure. European Economic Review, 42(1), 155–183. Pissarides, C. (2000). Equilibrium unemployment theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. Saez, E., Matsaganis, M., & Tsakloglou, P. (2012). Earnings determination and taxes: Evidence from a cohort based payroll tax reform in Greece. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 493–533. Salanié, B. (2003). The economics of taxation. Cambridge: MIT Press. Summers, L. (1989). Some simple economics of mandated benefits. American Economic Review, 79(2), 177–183. Tabellini, G., Boeri, T., & Börsch-Supan, A. (2002). Pension reforms and the opinions of European citizens. American Economic Review, 92(2), 396–401.