SEM application to the household travel survey on weekends versus weekdays: the case of Seoul, South Korea

Handy SL (2005) Smart growth and the transportation–land use connection: what does the research tell us? Int Reg Sci Rev 28(2):146–167 Bhat CR, Gossen R (2004) A mixed multinomial logit model analysis of weekend recreational episode type choice. Transp Res B 38(9):767–787 Liu RR, Deng Y (2009) Developing statewide weekend travel-demand forecast and mode-choice models for New Jersey. In: Sloboda BW (ed) Transportation statistics. J. Ross Publishing, Fort Lauderdale, pp 231–248 Lee Y, Washington S, Frank LD (2009) Examination of relationships between urban form, household activities, and time allocation in the Atlanta metropolitan region. Transp Res A 43(4):360–373 Manaugh K, El-Geneidy A (2012) What makes travel ‘local’: defining and understanding local travel behaviour. J Transp Land Use 5(3):15–27 Rajamani J, Bhat CR, Handy S, Knaap G, Song Y (2003) Assessing the impact of urban form measures on nonwork trip mode choice after controlling for demographic and level-of-service effects. Transp Res Rec 1831:158–165 Ryu S (2014) Comparing weekday and weekend travel patterns of the Korean capital region residents. Gyeonggi Research Institute, Suwon Seoul Statistics (2016) Statistics on Seoul citizens’ public transportation use. Seoul Metropolitan Government. http://stat.seoul.go.kr/jsp3/webzine.view.jsp?wj_id=109&link=5&sublink=2016. Accessed 8 Oct 2017 Gim T-HT (2011) A meta-analysis of the relationship between density and travel behavior. Transportation 39(3):491–519 Cao X, Mokhtarian PL, Handy SL (2009) Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transp Rev 29(3):359–395 Badoe DA, Miller EJ (2000) Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transp Res D 5(4):235–263 Ewing R, Cervero R (2001) Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transp Res Rec 1780:87–113 Gordon I (2008) Density and the built environment. Energy Policy 36(12):4652–4656 Melia S, Parkhurst G, Barton H (2011) The paradox of intensification. Transp Policy 18(1):46–52 Maat K, van Wee B, Stead D (2005) Land use and travel behaviour: expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories. Environ Plann B 32:33–46 Goulias KG, Kitamura R (1989) Recursive model system for trip generation and trip chaining. Transp Res Rec 1236:59–66 Meurs H, van Wee B (2004) Land use and mobility: a synthesis of findings and policy implications. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 3(2):219–233 Mokhtarian PL, Cao X (2008) Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transp Res B 42(3):204–228 Cao X, Mokhtarian PL, Handy SL (2007) Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation 34(5):535–556 Næss P (2005) Residential location affects travel behavior—but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Prog Plan 63(2):167–257 T-HT G (2013) The relationships between land use measures and travel behavior: a meta-analytic approach. Transp Plan Technol 36(5):413–434 Gim T-HT (2017) Examining the effects of residential self-selection on internal and external validity: an interaction moderation analysis using structural equation modeling. Transp Lett. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1338544 Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Mark Res 16(1):64–73 Coltman T, Devinney TM, Midgley DF, Venaik S (2008) Formative versus reflective measurement models: two applications of formative measurement. J Bus Res 61(12):1250–1262 Van Acker V, Witlox F (2011) Commuting trips within tours: how is commuting related to land use? Transportation 38(3):465–486 Rutherford GS, Mccormack E, Wilkinson M (1997) Travel impacts of urban form: implications from an analysis of two Seattle area travel diaries. Proceedings of urban design, telecommuting and travel forecasting conference, Williamsburg, pp 95–166 Troped PJ, Wilson JS, Matthews CE, Cromley EK, Melly SJ (2010) The built environment and location-based physical activity. Am J Prev Med 38(4):429–438 Forsyth A, Oakes JM, Schmitz KH, Hearst M (2007) Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity? Urban Stud 44(4):679–697 Cervero R, Duncan M (2003) Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco bay area. Am J Public Health 93(9):1478–1483 Ogilvie D, Mitchell R, Mutrie N, Petticrew M, Platt S (2008) Personal and environmental correlates of active travel and physical activity in a deprived urban population. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5(1):43 Lin J-J, Yu T-P (2011) Built environment effects on leisure travel for children: trip generation and travel mode. Transp Policy 18(1):246–258 Witten K, Blakely T, Bagheri N, Badland H, Ivory V, Pearce J, Mavoa S, Hinckson E, Schofield G (2012) Neighborhood built environment and transport and leisure physical activity: findings using objective exposure and outcome measures in New Zealand. Environ Health Perspect 120(7):971–977 T-HT G (2011) Influences on trip frequency according to travel purposes: a structural equation modeling approach in Seoul, South Korea. Environ Plann B 38(3):429–446 Bhat CR, Srinivasan S (2005) A multidimensional mixed ordered-response model for analyzing weekend activity participation. Transp Res B 39(3):255–278 Lanzendorf M (2002) Mobility styles and travel behavior: application of a lifestyle approach to leisure travel. Transp Res Rec 1807:163–173 Aditjandra PT, Cao X, Mulley C (2012) Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: an application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan data. Transp Res A 46(1):22–32 Bagley MN, Mokhtarian PL (2002) The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equations modeling approach. Ann Reg Sci 36(2):279–297 Van Acker V, Witlox F, van Wee B (2007) The effects of the land use system on travel behavior: a structural equation modeling approach. Transp Plan Technol 30(4):331–353 Gim T-HT (2013) Utility-based approaches to understanding the effects of urban compactness on travel behavior: a case of Seoul, Korea. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology Jun M-J, Jeong J-E (2011) Analysis on spatial mismatch and excess commuting of the Seoul metropolitan area using cubic spline function and linear programming. Journal of Korea Planning Association 46(4):189–197 Lee K (2013) Impacts of neighborhood’s land use and transit accessibility on residents’ commuting trips: a case study of Seoul. Journal of the Korea Academia–Industrial Cooperation Society 14(9):4593–4601 Lee KH, Kim TH, Lee WM, Kim EJ (2014) A study on effects of neighborhood’s environments on residents’ walking trips using household travel diary survey data in Seoul. Seoul Studies 15(3):95–109 Min B, Lee G, Kim S (2016) The effects of land-use characteristics on trip patterns by trip modes and purposes: focused on Seoul metropolitan administrative division. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea: Planning and Design 32(4):77–87 Shin S-Y (2004) The relationship between land use and automobile dependence: the case of Seoul. Seoul Studies 5(1):71–93 Ory DT (2007) Structural equation modeling of relative desired travel amounts. Dissertation, University of California, Davis Van Acker V, Mokhtarian PL, Witlox F (2011) Going soft: on how subjective variables explain modal choices for leisure travel. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 11(2):115–146 Aditjandra PT, Cao X, Mulley C (2016) Exploring changes in public transport use and walking following residential relocation: a British case study. J Transp Land Use 9(3):77–95 Cho H, Lee S (2016) Analysis of neighborhood environmental characteristics affecting walking activity time: focused on the difference between subjectively measured- and objectively measured-neighborhood environment. J Korea Plan Assoc 51(4):105–122 Choi S-T, Choo S-H, Jang J-Y (2016) Identifying the characteristics of elderly pedestrian using the Tobit model. J Korea Inst Intell Transp Syst 15(1):16–27 Kim H-C, Ahn K-H, Kwon Y-S (2014) The effects of residential environmental factors on personal walking probability: focused on Seoul. Urban Des 15(3):5–18 Lee KH, Ko EJ (2014) Relationships between neighbourhood environments and residents’ bicycle mode choice: a case study of Seoul. Int J Urban Sci 18(3):383–395 Lee KH, Won DH, Ko EJ (2015) The multiple impacts of the neighbourhood environment on the use of public bicycles by residents: an empirical study of Changwon in Korea. Int J Urban Sci 19(2):224–237 Næss P (2009) Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land use: travel studies. Transp Rev 29(3):293–324 Chen F, Bollen KA, Paxton P, Curran PJ, Kirby JB (2001) Improper solutions in structural equation models: causes, consequences, and strategies. Sociol Methods Res 29(4):468–508 Blunch NJ (2013) Introduction to structural equation modeling using IBM SPSS statistics and AMOS. Sage, London Choo S (2005) Aggregate relationships between telecommunications and travel: structural equation modeling of time series data. Dissertation, University of California, Davis Scheiner J, Holz-Rau C (2007) Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants? Transportation 34(4):487–511 Byrne BM (2010) Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge, New York Handy SL (1996) Understanding the link between urban form and nonwork travel behavior. J Plan Educ Res 15(3):183–198 Pucher J, Renne JL (2003) Socioeconomics of urban travel: evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transp Q 57(3):49–78 Zhang M (2004) The role of land use in travel mode choice: evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. J Am Plan Assoc 70(3):344–360 Brown BB, Yamada I, Smith KR, Zick CD, Kowaleski-Jones L, Fan JX (2009) Mixed land use and walkability: variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. Health Place 15(4):1130–1141 Christian HE, Bull FC, Middleton NJ, Knuiman MW, Divitini ML, Hooper P, Amarasinghe A, Giles-Corti B (2011) How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the RESIDE study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8(1):55 T-HT G (2011) A comparison of the effects of objective and perceived land use on travel behavior. Growth Chang 42(4):571–600 Osman T, Divigalpitiya P, Arima T (2016) Driving factors of urban sprawl in Giza governorate of the greater Cairo metropolitan region using a logistic regression model. Int J Urban Sci 20(2):206–225 Lee S, Suzuki T (2016) A scenario approach to the evaluation of sustainable urban structure for reducing carbon dioxide emissions in Seoul. Int J Urban Sci 20(1):30–48 Nivola PS (1999) Laws of the landscape: how policies shape cities in Europe and America. Natural Resources Defense Council, New York Choi E, Heo H, Sung H, Kim E (2010) A study on the estimation of sprawl index and its relationship with travel pattern in the capital region. Korea Spat Plan Rev 64:97–112 Lin D, Allan A, Cui J (2017) Sub-centres, socio-economic characteristics and commuting: a case study and its implications. Int J Urban Sci 21(2):147–171 Anda C, Erath A, Fourie PJ (2017) Transport modelling in the age of big data. Int J Urban Sci 21(supplement 1):19–42 Aditjandra PT (2013) The impact of urban development patterns on travel behaviour: lessons learned from a British metropolitan region using macro-analysis and micro-analysis in addressing the sustainability agenda. Res Transp Bus Manag 7(Supplement C):69–80 Thilakaratne RS, Wirasinghe SC (2016) Implementation of bus rapid transit (BRT) on an optimal segment of a long regular bus route. Int J Urban Sci 21(1):15–29 Cui J, Loo BPY, Lin D (2017) Travel behaviour and mobility needs of older adults in an ageing and car-dependent society. Int J Urban Sci 21(2):109–128 Loo BPY, du Verle F (2017) Transit-oriented development in future cities: towards a two-level sustainable mobility strategy. Int J Urban Sci 21(Supplement 1):54–67 Zhang X, Riedel T (2017) Urban traffic control: present and the future. Int J Urban Sci 21(Supplement 1):87–100 Oguchi T, Mitsuyasu A, Oshima D, Imagawa T (2017) An evaluation study on advanced public transport priority system using traffic simulation. Int J Urban Sci 21(Supplement 1):43–53 Song Y, Knaap G-J (2004) Measuring urban form: is Portland winning the war on sprawl? J Am Plan Assoc 70(2):210–225 Ramani TL, Zietsman J (2016) Sustainable transportation—alternative perspectives and enduring challenges. Int J Urban Sci 20(3):318–333 Ewing R, Cervero R (2010) Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J Am Plan Assoc 76(3):265–294 Mokhtarian PL, van Herick D (2016) Quantifying residential self-selection effects: a review of methods and findings from applications of propensity score and sample selection approaches. J Transp Land Use 9(1):9–28 Kim Y (2016) Impacts of the perception of physical environments and the actual physical environments on self-rated health. Int J Urban Sci 20(1):73–87