SAT patterns and engineering and computer science college majors: an intersectional, state-level study
Tóm tắt
Numerous efforts worldwide have been made to increase diversity in engineering and computer science (ECS), fields that pay well and promote upward mobility. However, in the United States (U.S.), females and students from underrepresented racial/ethnic minority groups (URM) still pursue ECS training far less than do their peers. The current study explored sex and racial/ethnic differences in ECS college enrollment as a function of math and verbal SAT score patterns (balanced or imbalanced) using an intersectional approach within a U.S. context. Data represented a census of students who took the SAT, graduated from all Virginia public high schools between 2006 and 2015, and enrolled in a 4-year college (
Our findings show, within each sex, URM students were at least as likely as their non-URM peers to enroll in ECS programs when they scored within similar SAT score ranges. Students were more likely to enroll in ECS programs if their SAT profile favored math, compared to students with similar math and verbal SAT scores (balanced profile). This overall pattern is notably less pronounced for URM female students; their propensity to major in ECS appeared to be largely independent of verbal scores.
Our findings inform strategies to diversify ECS enrollment. If programs continue to emphasize SAT scores during admission decisions or if more systemic issues of resource allocation in secondary schools are not addressed, other efforts to broaden participation in ECS programs may fall short of goals. Our findings also highlight the importance of considering the intersection of sex and race/ethnicity for recruitment or other educational promotions.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
Bonous-Hammarth, M. (2000). Pathways to success: Affirming opportunities for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1), 92–111.
Buchmann, C., Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–461.
Cech, E. A. (2022). The intersectional privilege of white able-bodied heterosexual men in STEM. Science Advances, 8(24), 1–14.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(8), 3157–3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014871108
Chowdhury, S., & Chowdhury, T. (2007). Increasing enrollment of minority women in engineering [Paper presentation]. 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, United States. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--3051.
Cook, E. E., & Turner, S. (2019). Missed exams and lost opportunities: Who could gain from expanded college admission testing? AERA Open, 5(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419855030
Copur-Gencturk, Y., Cimpian, J. R., Lubienski, S. T., & Thacker, I. (2020). Teachers’ bias against the mathematical ability of female, Black, and Hispanic students. Educational Researcher, 49(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19890577
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.
Crenshaw, K. W. (2014). The structural and political dimensions of intersectional oppression. In P. R. Grzanka (Ed.), Intersectionality: A foundations and frontiers reader (pp. 17–22). Westview Press.
Davenport, E. C., Jr., Davison, M. L., Kuang, H., Ding, S., Kim, S. K., & Kwak, N. (1998). High school mathematics course-taking by gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035003497
Davenport, E. C., Jr., Davison, M. L., Wu, Y. C., Kim, S. K., Kuang, H., Kwak, N., & Ayodele, A. (2013). Number of courses, content of coursework, and prior achievement as related to ethnic achievement gaps in mathematics. Journal of Educational Leadership in Action, 2(1), 4.
Davison, M. L., Jew, G. B., & Davenport, E. C., Jr. (2014). Patterns of SAT scores, choice of STEM major, and gender. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175614522269
Delaine, D. A., Williams, D. N., Sigamoney, R., & Tull, R. G. (2016). Global diversity and inclusion in engineering education: Developing platforms toward global alignment. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 6(1), 56–71.
Evans, B. (2015). College admission testing in America. In V. Stead (Ed.), International perspectives in higher education admission policy: A reader. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Glessner, K., Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., & Lopez, M. L. (2017). “Yes, I Can”: Testing an Intervention to Increase Middle School Students’ College and Career Self-Efficacy. The Career Development Quarterly, 65(4), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12110
Goldman, R. D., & Hewitt, B. N. (1976). Predicting the success of Black, Chicano, Oriental and White college students. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00002.x.
Gupta, N. (2019). Intersectionality of gender and caste in academic performance: Quantitative study of an elite Indian engineering institute. Gender, Technology and Development, 23(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2019.1636568
Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(81)90019-1.
Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter & Peng, S. (2000). Entry and persistence of women and minorities in college science and engineering education. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000601.pdf
Husbands Fealing, K., & McNeely, C. L. (2016). Symposium on the science of broadening participation. National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/scisip/SoBP_Symposium_report_final.pdf
Jonas, D., Goldschmidt, W., & Garland, M. (2015). Researchers’ Guide to Using VLDS, Version 1.1. Virginia Department of Education. https://vlds.virginia.gov/media/1051/researchersguidevldsversion11.docx
Knight, D. B., Grohs, J. R., Bradburn, I. S., Kinoshita, T. J., Vaziri, S., Matusovich, M., & H., & Carrico, C. (2020). Illuminating inequality in access: Variation in enrollment in undergraduate engineering programs across Virginia’s high schools. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20352
Lee, V. E., & Burkham, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: social background differences in achievement as children begin school. New York: Economic Policy Institute.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.
Lundy-Wagner, V. C., Veenstra, C. P., Orr, M. K., Ramirez, N. M., Ohland, M. W., & Long, R. A. (2014). Gaining access or losing ground? Socioeconomically disadvantaged students in undergraduate Engineering, 1994–2003. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(3), 339–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777331
Malcolm, S.M., Hall, P.Q., & Brown, J.W. (1976). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Mann, A., & DiPrete, T. A. (2013). Trends in gender segregation in the choice of science and engineering majors. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1519–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.002
May, G. S., & Chubin, D. E. (2003). A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority students. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00735.x
McNeely, C. L., & Husbands Fealing, K. (2018). Moving the needle, raising consciousness: The science and practice of broadening participation. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(5), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218768874
Min, Y., Zhang, G., Long, R. A., Anderson, T. J., & Ohland, M. W. (2011). Nonparametric survival analysis of the loss rate of undergraduate Engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00017.x
Moakler, M. W., Jr., & Kim, M. M. (2014). College major choice in STEM: Revisiting confidence and demographic factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00075.x
National Research Council (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13158.
National Science Foundation. (2017). Women, minorities and persons with disabilities in science and engineering, https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/static/downloads/nsf17310-digest.pdf
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2021). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2021. Special Report NSF 21–321. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd.
Nguyen, H.-H.D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012702
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.129
Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education (pp. 99–157). Springer: Berlin.
Pfatteicher, S. K. A., & Tongue, M. P. (2002). What drives diversity? Engineering education and underrepresentation of minority groups. Annual Frontiers in Education, 3, s11–s16. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2002.1158616
Riegle-Crumb, C., & Grodsky, E. (2010). Racial-ethnic differences at the intersection of math course-taking and achievement. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 248–270.
Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a White male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x10391657
Schroeder, A.D. (2012). Pad and chaff: Secure approximate string matching in private record linkage. IIWAS'12: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services. pp. 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1145/2428736.2428757
Snyder, T.D., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S.A. (2019). Digest of education statistics 2017 (NCES 2018–070). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
Steele, J., James, J. B., & Barnett, R. C. (2002). Learning in a man’s world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00042
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
Tao, Y., & McNeely, C. (2019). Gender and race intersectional effects in the U.S. engineering workforce: Who stays? Who leaves? International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 11(1), 181–202.
Teitelbaum, P. (2003). The influence of high school graduation requirement policies in mathematics and science on student course-taking patterns and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(1), 31–57.
Tyson, W., Lee, R., Borman, K. M., & Hanson, M. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824660701601266
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011a). Age and sex omposition: 2010. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2011a/dec/c2010br-03.pdf
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011b). Overview of race and Hispanic origin: 2010. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2011b/dec/c2010br-02.pdf
UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO science report: Toward 2030. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235406/PDF/235406eng.pdf.multi
UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development. S. Schneegans, T. Straza and J. Lewis (Eds). UNESCO Publishing: Paris.
Virginia Department of Education (2020). Virginia Longitudinal Data System (VLDS) data dictionary. Retrieved from https://vlds.virginia.gov/insights
Wai, J., Cacchio, M., Putallaz, M., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30 year examination. Intelligence, 38(4), 412–423.
Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775.
Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A., Reed, E. J., & Pascarella, E. T. (2008). College majors and social mobility. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2008.02.002
Wulf, W. A. (2002). The importance of diversity in Engineering. in National Academy of Engineering (Ed.), Diversity in Engineering: Managing the workforce of the future (pp. 8–14). Washington: The National Academies Press.